07.12.2017 Views

AviTrader_Monthly_MRO_e-Magazine_2017-06

AviTrader_Monthly_MRO_e-Magazine_2017-06

AviTrader_Monthly_MRO_e-Magazine_2017-06

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lufthansa Consulting<br />

37<br />

Dissecting<br />

predictive maintenance<br />

Airlines utilising predictive analysis report a significant decrease in maintenance costs.<br />

Photo: Lufthansa Technik<br />

Panagiotis Poligenis, Associate Partner, at Lufthansa Consulting looks at how this process is enabling<br />

increased aircraft reliability and reducing airlines’ operating costs.<br />

It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent,<br />

but the ones most responsive to change. This essential message of<br />

On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, is a<br />

statement that airlines and <strong>MRO</strong> providers ought to incorporate in<br />

their strategy. In times of advanced digitalisation technologies and big<br />

data, most of those organizations still adopt either a preventive or a<br />

reactive approach to maintenance events. Those who deliberately opt<br />

for predictive maintenance based on the technical data of their fleets<br />

are tomorrow’s winners.<br />

The two main schemes in place today have shown their limitations:<br />

while the reactive approach involves replacing a component only after<br />

it has failed, thus incurring associated costs and often AOG (Aircraft<br />

On Ground) time, the preventive approach stipulates that life-limited<br />

parts must be replaced at established intervals, which might be too<br />

soon or at times too late. The costs associated with those two schemes<br />

can consume up to 20% of an airline’s operating costs.<br />

The predictive maintenance approach combines CBM (Condition-<br />

Based Monitoring) and data driven prognostics. By comparing data<br />

and trends collected in real-time with historical data and definitions of<br />

optimal measurements, the predictive models identify anomalies and<br />

the root causes of failures.<br />

The decisive advantages of predictive maintenance<br />

• Airlines utilising predictive analysis report a significant decrease of<br />

their maintenance costs. In fact, the early effective warnings issued by<br />

the system monitoring the health of their fleet in real time, together<br />

with the data prognostics, enable them to replace the defective parts<br />

or system and take maintenance action only when the life cycle of<br />

the unit has been reached or when system deterioration is the root<br />

cause. Proper alignment of resources is a useful outcome for <strong>MRO</strong>.<br />

The airline’s priority is to lower the missed alarm rate in order to react<br />

effectively at a given time.<br />

• Predictive maintenance strategy for <strong>MRO</strong> departments aims to identify<br />

the real drivers of performance amongst a tremendous amount<br />

of data and internal KPIs, which prevent ad-hoc maintenance action.<br />

These indicators are used to initiate optimal maintenance schedules,<br />

updated in real-time, which allow<br />

maintenance resources to fix defects<br />

more efficently while increasing aircraft<br />

utilisation.<br />

• Predictive solutions based on CBM<br />

and data-driven prognostics enable<br />

inventory managers to create models<br />

that score inventory levels for each<br />

component, thus allowing them to<br />

identify repairable or consumable<br />

parts that are likely to be out of stock.<br />

This improves availability of the rotable<br />

and expendable inventory, and<br />

reduces inventory costs.<br />

Panagiotis Poligenis, Associate Partner<br />

at Lufthansa Consulting<br />

<strong>AviTrader</strong> <strong>MRO</strong> - June <strong>2017</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!