myassignmenthelp_com_blog_supervisor_scholar_relationship

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Formal/ businesslike If you keep your discussions concise and on-point, that is, if you hardly ever discuss anything apart from your PhD topic, research proposal and design, research mechanism and tools as well the philosophy behind framing the research hypothesis, then yours is a businesslike or formal relationship. Note that these discussions usually take place within the campus premises and preferably at the supervisor’s office or the university library, rarely ever venturing into general topics like the weather or your families. Inviting you over to his house for dinner or showing an active interest in your philatelic pursuits are not usual occurrences in this kind of relationship. Pros: Increased efficiency in delivering the tasks, more time devoted to the research topic and areas of focus, and careful consideration of the submission deadlines Cons: Too formal relationships leading to increased dissent regarding the research areas, research design and methodology as well as missing out on networking opportunities with academic contemporaries Informal/ personal The informal or personal relationship structure of the supervisor-scholar relationship is a wholly different world where your supervisor treats you more like a friend than a scholar pursuing his PhD under his guidance. If you meet over drinks, discuss politics, family, and he has introduced you to the contemporary academics of his time and field, then you two share a camaraderie that is quite sought-after and hard to come by. However, in these kinds of relationships, the discussions on work tend to take a backseat and might be ignored for days. In these kinds of relationships, you will share a greater level of frankness with your supervisor and have a healthy exchange of ideas on practically all topics under the sun, bringing in a refreshing working ambience for both of you. While it can be fulfilling in many aspects, these kinds of relationships require a lot of effort from both the supervisor and the scholar to keep track of the academic aspects of the PhD in check. Pros: More free and healthy exchange of ideas and developing a bond that can be cherished for a lifetime Cons: Lackadaisical attitude on behalf of both the supervisor and the scholar, resulting in sloppiness and tardiness in submission These variables significantly influence the power dynamics of the relationship between the scholar and supervisor. While sharing drinks with your supervisor over healthy discussions on world politics might seem like an alluring idea, there have been instances of supervisors taking undue advantage of all kinds (from unpaid babysitting jobs for their kids to sleazy proposals of taking the relationship to a whole ‘new’ level) from the scholars. On the other hand, too stand-offish and distant level of interaction between the two hampers the free flow of ideas and healthy exchange of points of view that is necessary for an academic pursuit of the higher levels. Type of task execution Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
The type of task execution covers the logistical aspects of the relationship. The task execution sees the exact process involved in the interaction pattern between you and your supervisor. The attitudes in the discussions, the frequency of such meetings and the eye for detail regarding your research are the key factors that affect the task execution factor of your relationship. The following are the two major categories of task execution in a scholar-supervisor relationship. Product-driven task execution If your supervisor is very diligent about the meetings, keeps a regular tab of your progress and always encourages you to turn up for the meetings armed with the scores of drafts you have written so far, then the task execution aspect of your relationship is product-driven. In these kinds of relationships, the supervisor is more into discussing the product and ensures that there is no option for you to have a laidback attitude towards the writing aspect of your thesis. However, he might even cancel or reschedule the meetings in case you miss deadlines and be overtly neglecting in his duties if you show the slightest signs of sloppiness. These kinds of relationships keep the scholar on their toes all the time, giving them little or no scope for writer’s block or other issues. Pros: Keeping a tab of all the deadlines and timely submission of drafts Cons: Very rigorous task execution process, giving the scholar not much space for innovation or detailing the process with the supervisor Process-driven task execution The process-driven task execution is a comparatively freer form of scholar-supervisor relationship and allows space for the scholar to have his say regarding the research design and drafting. The supervisor is more of a friendly mentor and helps the scholar resolve the issues of writer’s block or helps them cope with the stress of writing through sharing the experience of their PhD days. The process-driven task execution aspect of the scholar-supervisor relationship keeps the flow of work dynamic and healthy. However, the supervisor and the scholar might both get a bit lackadaisical with their attitude towards the deadlines that results in burning the midnight candle on the nights before the important submission dates and a lot of cramming on the part of the scholar. Scheduling frequent meetings with the scholar to help him through the entire process and not only focusing on his drafts, but the supervisor also takes the relationship to newer heights and offering his hand as more of a friend than an intimidating figure in the world of academics. Pros: Prompt resolution of the stumbles faced in the writing and drafting process as well as a thorough and mutual understanding of the research design and structure between the scholar and supervisor for better scholastic expression of the discipline Cons: Occasional negligence to the deadlines resulting in issues with the administrative bodies as well as meandering and long-winding discussions driven by the process with less focus on product that hinders the qualitative aspect of the PhD thesis Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API PDFCROWD
Page 1 and 2: Order Now Login/Signup Blog Make
Page 3: Careful perusal of all the drafts t
Page 7 and 8: Keeping in touch with your supervis
Page 9 and 10: RELATED POST 5 Ways to Turn Competi
Page 11 and 12: Google Plus Followers 2866 Twitter

myassignmenthelp_com_blog_supervisor_scholar_relationship

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?