myassignmenthelp_com_blog_supervisor_scholar_relationship

The type of task execution covers the logistical aspects of the relationship. The task execution sees the exact process
involved in the interaction pattern between you and your supervisor. The attitudes in the discussions, the frequency of
such meetings and the eye for detail regarding your research are the key factors that affect the task execution factor
of your relationship. The following are the two major categories of task execution in a scholar-supervisor relationship.
Product-driven task execution
If your supervisor is very diligent about the meetings, keeps a regular tab of your progress and always encourages
you to turn up for the meetings armed with the scores of drafts you have written so far, then the task execution aspect
of your relationship is product-driven. In these kinds of relationships, the supervisor is more into discussing the
product and ensures that there is no option for you to have a laidback attitude towards the writing aspect of your
thesis. However, he might even cancel or reschedule the meetings in case you miss deadlines and be overtly
neglecting in his duties if you show the slightest signs of sloppiness. These kinds of relationships keep the scholar on
their toes all the time, giving them little or no scope for writer’s block or other issues.
Pros: Keeping a tab of all the deadlines and timely submission of drafts
Cons: Very rigorous task execution process, giving the scholar not much space for innovation or detailing the process
with the supervisor
Process-driven task execution
The process-driven task execution is a comparatively freer form of scholar-supervisor relationship and allows space
for the scholar to have his say regarding the research design and drafting. The supervisor is more of a friendly mentor
and helps the scholar resolve the issues of writer’s block or helps them cope with the stress of writing through sharing
the experience of their PhD days. The process-driven task execution aspect of the scholar-supervisor relationship
keeps the flow of work dynamic and healthy. However, the supervisor and the scholar might both get a bit
lackadaisical with their attitude towards the deadlines that results in burning the midnight candle on the nights before
the important submission dates and a lot of cramming on the part of the scholar. Scheduling frequent meetings with
the scholar to help him through the entire process and not only focusing on his drafts, but the supervisor also takes
the relationship to newer heights and offering his hand as more of a friend than an intimidating figure in the world of
academics.
Pros: Prompt resolution of the stumbles faced in the writing and drafting process as well as a thorough and mutual
understanding of the research design and structure between the scholar and supervisor for better scholastic
expression of the discipline
Cons: Occasional negligence to the deadlines resulting in issues with the administrative bodies as well as meandering
and long-winding discussions driven by the process with less focus on product that hinders the qualitative aspect of
the PhD thesis
Create PDF in your applications with the Pdfcrowd HTML to PDF API
PDFCROWD