07.02.2018 Views

Pittwater Life August 2017 Issue

Local Election Countdown. DAs Process Overhauled. Gallop Poll. Taste of the Beaches.

Local Election Countdown. DAs Process Overhauled. Gallop Poll. Taste of the Beaches.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ayed?<br />

said many residents who<br />

were looking to downsize<br />

locally would love to<br />

live in a compact, wellappointed<br />

apartment with no<br />

maintenance, close to public<br />

transport and shopping<br />

facilities and a higher<br />

standard of accessibility.<br />

She said The Boathouse<br />

development on the corner<br />

of Hudson Parade and<br />

Riverview Road at Clareville<br />

(right) was an example of<br />

an “overdevelopment” that<br />

proved unfounded.<br />

“It has six Seniors Living<br />

apartments and underground<br />

parking and was the subject<br />

of residents’ complaints and<br />

court action… one wonders<br />

what all the fuss was about,”<br />

she said, adding she had<br />

nothing to do with the project.<br />

“This is a really welldesigned<br />

development, which<br />

snuggles into the corner,<br />

beautifully maintained with<br />

lovely landscaping.<br />

“It’s a totally appropriate<br />

infill development which is<br />

needed in this area to fulfil<br />

a clear demand for people<br />

wanting to age in the area,<br />

but not necessarily needing to<br />

go into supported aged care<br />

facilities.”<br />

Similarly, she said<br />

secondary dwellings were<br />

now permissible in parts of<br />

<strong>Pittwater</strong> zoned Environmental<br />

Living (formerly zoned<br />

residential) and were a great<br />

form of infill development on<br />

properties where there was<br />

sufficient space.<br />

“In some cases, compromise<br />

is necessary in terms of tree<br />

removal and aspirations for<br />

tree retention, but it’s unlikely<br />

to be justifiably judged as<br />

overdevelopment particularly<br />

where the property is of a<br />

substantial size, and given<br />

that a secondary dwelling can<br />

only be 25 per cent of the floor<br />

area of the main dwelling.”<br />

Ursula said it was time the<br />

local area was delivered some<br />

quality buildings that could<br />

be considered “beautiful” in<br />

terms of their architectural<br />

design – “I struggle to think<br />

of more than one in the<br />

whole of the former <strong>Pittwater</strong><br />

Council area” – with generous<br />

landscaped public space at<br />

ground, foyers with seating,<br />

cafes, and the essential lift<br />

access not mandated on<br />

buildings under four-storeys.<br />

“With a new Council<br />

soon to be elected, let’s<br />

take the opportunity to do<br />

planning better,” she urged.<br />

“Let’s look at the detail of<br />

development proposals<br />

carefully, collaborate with<br />

both developers, applicants<br />

of development proposals,<br />

and the community, and<br />

not shy away from proper<br />

communication, discussions<br />

around the table and working<br />

out how to get the best<br />

planning outcomes with the<br />

least environmental impact.<br />

“Finally, let’s not hide away<br />

behind meaningless words<br />

like ‘overdevelopment’.”<br />

What Do You Think?<br />

Tell us at<br />

readers@pittwaterlife.com.au<br />

– Nigel Wall<br />

News<br />

The Local Voice Since 1991<br />

AUGUST <strong>2017</strong> 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!