16.02.2018 Views

CU1801

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COMMENT<br />

Editor:<br />

David Chadwick<br />

(cad.user@btc.co.uk)<br />

News Editor:<br />

Mark Lyward<br />

(mark.lyward@btc.co.uk)<br />

Advertising Sales:<br />

Josh Boulton<br />

(josh.boulton@btc.co.uk)<br />

Production Manager:<br />

Abby Penn<br />

(abby.penn@btc.co.uk)<br />

Design/Layout:<br />

Ian Collis<br />

ian.collis@btc.co.uk<br />

Circulation/Subscriptions:<br />

Christina Willis<br />

(christina.willis@btc.co.uk)<br />

Publisher:<br />

John Jageurs<br />

john.jageurs@btc.co.uk<br />

Published by Barrow &<br />

Thompkins Connexion Ltd.<br />

35 Station Square, Petts Wood,<br />

Kent BR5 1LZ<br />

Tel: +44 (0) 1689 616 000<br />

Fax: +44 (0) 1689 82 66 22<br />

SUBSCRIPTIONS:<br />

UK £35/year, £60/two years,<br />

£80/three years;<br />

Europe:<br />

£48/year, £85 two years,<br />

£127/three years;<br />

R.O.W. £62/year<br />

£115/two years, £168/three years.<br />

Single copies can be bought for £8.50<br />

(includes postage & packaging).<br />

Published 6 times a year.<br />

© 2018 Barrow & Thompkins<br />

Connexion Ltd.<br />

All rights reserved.<br />

No part of the magazine may be<br />

reproduced, without prior consent<br />

in writing, from the publisher<br />

For more magazines from BTC, please visit:<br />

www.btc.co.uk<br />

Articles published reflect the opinions of<br />

the authors and are not necessarily those<br />

of the publisher or his employees. While<br />

every reasonable effort is made to ensure<br />

that the contents of editorial and advertising<br />

are accurate, no responsibility can be<br />

accepted by the publisher for errors, misrepresentations<br />

or any resulting effects<br />

Comment<br />

Carillion - the bubble has burst<br />

by David Chadwick<br />

There will hardly be a company in the<br />

construction industry left untouched by<br />

the demise of Carillion. It will impact the<br />

thousands of contractors who will not now<br />

be paid for work done on one of the many<br />

projects that Carillion farmed out, the<br />

contractors working on projects that will<br />

be shelved or put into abeyance, not to<br />

mention the companies that will pick up<br />

the maintenance contracts for schools,<br />

hospitals, prisons, etc. More still will feel<br />

the wind of stable doors slamming shut<br />

long after the many horses have bolted.<br />

The laxity in rules, regulations and<br />

oversight allowing one of the largest<br />

contractors in the construction industry to<br />

take the government and its<br />

subcontractors to the cleaners will be the<br />

focus of a turbulent 2018, and calls for<br />

action will grow as the crisis deepens and<br />

those caught up in look for help.<br />

It has been suggested that the changing<br />

role of Carillion, focusing on the<br />

outsourcing of tenders won by the<br />

company rather than concentrating on<br />

managing the projects themselves, led to<br />

this situation. If you look deeper into the<br />

mechanics of such a business<br />

philosophy, you will soon realise that the<br />

expertise needed within such an<br />

organisation has more to do with the<br />

winning of tenders rather then the actual<br />

management of successful construction<br />

and asset maintenance projects.<br />

Moreover, the success of individuals<br />

within Carillion depends on contracts won<br />

and farmed out to subcontractors, a role<br />

substantially enhanced by the apparent<br />

clout of the company.<br />

The problem is that projects will be<br />

taken on with less and less<br />

understanding of their value, complexity<br />

and cost, and newer markets will need to<br />

be found in areas where the company<br />

has little or no experience, such as<br />

cooking school meals. There will be<br />

failures, missed deadlines, budget<br />

shortfalls and resourcing problems when<br />

contractors don't get paid - but the<br />

shareholders will be happy as they see<br />

the value of the projects increase on a<br />

regular basis, and the CEOs and other<br />

principals are suitably rewarded. A<br />

magnificent Ponzi scheme.<br />

The Government says that it pays its<br />

principal contractors, i.e. Carillion, on time<br />

and can't understand why such payments<br />

have not been handed on to the<br />

subcontractors who are actually doing the<br />

work. That boils down to a serious<br />

amount of money being held up in an<br />

organisation to feed its sales teams,<br />

contract managers and others, rather<br />

than filtering down to the construction site<br />

to pay for the employees, the building<br />

work being carried out, the materials<br />

being sourced, and the management of<br />

the project itself.<br />

Over the next few years there are going<br />

to be calls for more government<br />

intervention, greater oversight, and<br />

massive handouts to keep businesses<br />

going and public services adequately<br />

maintained. Companies engaged in<br />

similar practices will come under greater<br />

scrutiny, and may need to reassess their<br />

business philosophy.<br />

You might think that this comes under<br />

the heading of 'unfortunate timing'. The<br />

construction industry is already facing<br />

problems in many areas after all, with the<br />

uncertainties of Brexit, the lack of<br />

affordable housing, falling house prices,<br />

skill shortages and so on. The<br />

construction industry is going to take<br />

centre stage for a while, as the most<br />

appropriate stick for beating the<br />

government with - hence the decision to<br />

pre-empt the furore by 'investigating the<br />

'fat cats' within Carillion.<br />

4 January/February 2018

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!