30.03.2018 Views

SMAD

mision espacial

mision espacial

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42 Mission Characterization 2.4<br />

2.4 Step 6: Characterizing the Mission Arcbitecture 43<br />

TABLE 2-12. Summary of Orbit and Constellation Characteristics. See text for discussion.<br />

TABLE 2-13.<br />

1 AltItude<br />

2 Incnnatlon<br />

3 Eccentricity<br />

4 Argument of perigee for nonclrcular orbits<br />

5 l1V budget for orbit transfer<br />

6 l1V budget for orbit maintenance<br />

7 Whether orbit will be controlled or uncontrolled<br />

8 Number and relative orientation of orbit planes (constellations)<br />

9 Number and spacing of spacecraft per orbit plana (consteHations)<br />

Summary of MissIon-Payload Characteristics. For multiple payloads, we must<br />

determine parameters for each payload.<br />

1. Physical Parameters<br />

1.1 Envelope dimensions<br />

1.2 Mass properties<br />

2. Viewing and Pointing<br />

2.1 Aperture size and shape<br />

2.2 Size and orientation of clear field of view required<br />

2.3 PrimaJy pointing dlrectlon*<br />

2.4 PoIntIng direction range and accuracy required<br />

2.5 Tracking or scanning rate<br />

2.6 Pointing or tracking duration and duty cycle<br />

3. Electrical Power<br />

3.1 VoHage<br />

3.2 Average and peak power<br />

3.3 Peak power duty cycle<br />

4. Telemetry and Commands<br />

4.1 Number of commend and telemetry channels<br />

4.2 Commend memory size and time resolution<br />

4.3 Data rates or quantity of data<br />

5. Thermal Control<br />

5.1 Temperature Omits (operatlnglnon-operatlng)<br />

5.2 Heat rejection to spacecraft (average/peak wattage/duty cycle)<br />

*e.g., Sun, star, nadir, ground target, another spacecraft<br />

Payload vs. orbit trades typically try to balance the resolution advantages of low<br />

altitudes against the fewer spacecraft needed for the same coverage at higher altitudes.<br />

The counterbalancing factor is that we need a sensor with a larger aperture and better<br />

sensitivity to obtain the same resolution at higher altitudes; the more capable sensor<br />

costs more and needs a larger spacecraft and launch system.<br />

Payload vs. spacecraft trades usually try to meet pointing and tracking requirements<br />

at the lowest cost. At one extreme, the payload does all the pointing independently of<br />

the spacecraft attitude; an example is the use of gimballed scan platforms on the JPL<br />

Mariner MK-ll spacecraft. At the opposite extreme, Space Telescope and Chandra<br />

X-Ray Observatory point the entire spacecraft with the required level of accuracy. An<br />

intermediate approach used on RME points the entire spacecraft to a lower level of accuracy,<br />

allowing the payload to do fine pointing over a limited field of regard.·<br />

E. Select the Mission Operations Approach (Chapters 13-15)<br />

We next select and size the elements needed to support communications and c0ntrol<br />

of the spacecraft and payload. Table 2-14 gives the key parameters. Typically a<br />

mission operations control center commands and controls the spacecraft and delivers<br />

data to the user. With rare exceptions, we would choose an existing control renter,<br />

based on the user's needs, downlink data rates, and, in some cases, security considerations.<br />

Both NASA and the Air Force have existing systems. Particular institutions,<br />

such as Intelsat or Comsat, use custom systems. Most commercial operators employ<br />

system-peculiar control centers. If needed, we can interconnect most systems withdifferent<br />

options for relaying communications. Chapter 15 details the specification,<br />

selection, and design of this element.<br />

TABLE 2-14.<br />

Summary of Mission Operations CharacteristIcs.<br />

1. Communications Architecture<br />

1.1 Number and distribution of ground stations<br />

1.2 Downnnk and upUnk path design<br />

1.3 Crossnnk characteristics, H used<br />

1.4 Relay satenltes used<br />

1.5 Communications link budget<br />

1.6 Space-to-ground data rates<br />

2. Ground System<br />

2.1 Use of existing or dedicated faciDties<br />

2.2 Required transmit and receive characJerlstics<br />

2.3 Required data handUng<br />

3. Operations<br />

3.1 Level of automation<br />

3.2 Software lines of code to be created<br />

3.3 Fun-time or part-time staffing<br />

3.4 Number of personnel<br />

3.5 Amount of commanding required<br />

3.6 Timeliness of data distribution<br />

The communications architecture transfers the required mission data (payload and<br />

housekeeping data) from the spacecraft down to the mission operations control center.<br />

In addition, we must send commands back to the spacecraft, and meet other requirements<br />

such as encryption. Thus, we select the communications relay elements along<br />

with the mission control system after most payload and orbit trades are complete.<br />

Typical options are SGLS for Air Force missions or IDRSS/GSIDN with the NASA<br />

mission control centers. Custom systems are required for some applications and are<br />

commonly used for· commercial missions in geosynchronous orbit. Chapter 13<br />

describes communications architectures, and Chap. 14 treats operations.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!