19.04.2018 Views

West Lake CAG NRRB Submission REVISED ADDENDUM January 4 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

E. Cost Comparison:<br />

Past FS documents have shown a range of costs for the alternatives. We respectfully submit<br />

the chart below which shows the Full Excavation having a range of cost between $443M and<br />

$710M. This particular Remedy has a 60% Contingency adder vs. the Cap Only Remedy<br />

which has a 30% Contingency adder. If the Cap only Remedy had the same adder as Full<br />

Excavation, its cost would have been $92M, thus closing the cost gap.<br />

Per FFS Appendix K<br />

Preliminary Estimated<br />

Capital Costs<br />

FFS ROD<br />

Remedy<br />

Alternative<br />

FFS UMTRCA Cap<br />

Remedy<br />

Alternative<br />

Partial Excavation<br />

(52.9 pCi/g)<br />

Remedy<br />

Alternative<br />

1,000 pCi/g<br />

Remedy<br />

Alternative<br />

Full Excavation<br />

(7.9 pCi/g)<br />

Remedy<br />

Alternative<br />

Cost Range<br />

Cost without Contingency $57,750,000 $68,500,000 $173,030,000 $221,850,000 $443,180,000<br />

Cost with Contingency $75,000,000 $96,000,000 $280,000,000 $374,000,000 $710,000,000<br />

Contigency Uplift Percent 30% 40% 62% 69% 60%<br />

F. Time to Implement Remedy:<br />

We find it curious that the annual expenditure by the PRPs is the same for each Remedy.<br />

We find this to be inconsistent with EPA Region 7 prior statements that there is not a limit<br />

to the amount of expense the PRPs are expected to bear per year. We have found that the<br />

PRPs have not been behaving as good neighbors, causing many delays in the resolution of<br />

this site. Their stall tactics with EPA, the State of Missouri, and their attacks on our efforts<br />

by creating and funding a “grass roots” movement against remediation should not be<br />

rewarded with low annual cash outlays.<br />

G. Air Traffic Safety:<br />

Republic Services has successfully controlled birds at similarly situated sites, including an<br />

operational landfill within 10,000 feet of an airport in CA 11<br />

After 27 years of waiting for the NRC/AEC/DOE to address this site, and another 27 years waiting<br />

for Superfund to address this site, this community deserves the safest and most permanent solution<br />

for this site; a solution that takes into consideration our future health and economic success. Any<br />

solution which exposes us to risk from off-site migration of waste be it natural or man-made<br />

disaster, any solution which is based in any part on incomplete skewed data, or any solution which<br />

requires 1000 years of monitoring and maintenance is unacceptable to this community.<br />

We hope you found this memo helpful and we look forward to working with you in the future to<br />

bring a safe and permanent Remedy to the <strong>West</strong> <strong>Lake</strong> Landfill / Bridgeton Landfill Complex.<br />

11<br />

Demonstration of the Continued Effectiveness of the Bird Control Program at the Forward Landfill, Manteca, California – 2012-<br />

2013. Prepared by LGL Limited Environmental Research Associates for Republic Services, Inc. (2013)<br />

http://moenvironment.org/files/FLE_DSEIR_APPX_C.pdf<br />

Page 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!