19.04.2018 Views

West Lake CAG NRRB Submission REVISED ADDENDUM January 4 2018

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Final Feasibility Study Report<br />

BoRit Asbestos Superfund Site, Operable Unit 1, Ambler, PA<br />

November 18, 2016<br />

Does not contain any numeric indicator of risk for remedial worker and includes qualitative<br />

statements like:<br />

This disturbance of contaminated waste, soil, and Reservoir sediment could also pose short-term<br />

risks to workers from inhalation of asbestos fibers during implementation of the remedy. Safety<br />

measures such as dust suppression, personal protective equipment (PPE), and establishment of<br />

work zones would protect workers during implementation. Other potential impacts to workers<br />

would be mitigated through adherence to safety plans and standard operating procedures.<br />

Feasibility Study Report (Revison 01)<br />

Donna Reservoir and Canal System<br />

Donna , Hidalgo County, Texas<br />

July 2016<br />

Does not contain any numeric indicator of risk for remedial workers and includes qualitative<br />

statements like:<br />

Short term risks are elevated in Alternative 3. The community is affected by an increase in<br />

traffic caused by the transportation of equipment and material. Additionally, dust may be<br />

produced during construction and transportation activities, but can be mitigated through<br />

standard construction practices.<br />

Revised Draft Feasibility Study<br />

Peterson/Puritan, Inc. Superfund Site – Operable<br />

Unit 2<br />

Cumberland and Lincoln, Rhode Island<br />

July 2014<br />

Does not contain any numeric indicator of risk for remedial workers and includes qualitative<br />

statements like:<br />

Implementation of this alternative would potentially result in short-term exposure risks to the<br />

community, workers, or the environment during soil removal and installation of the RCRA<br />

Subtitle C cap; these potential risks would be managed with engineering controls, access<br />

restrictions, and worker training.<br />

FINAL RADIOLOGICAL <strong>ADDENDUM</strong> TO THE <strong>REVISED</strong> FEASIBILITY STUDY<br />

REPORT FOR PARCEL C<br />

PARCEL C, HUNTERS POINT SHIPYARD<br />

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA<br />

June 20, 2008<br />

Does not contain any numeric indicator of risk for remedial workers and includes tables with<br />

indicators of short-term risk as “good” or “very good.” It also has tables with circles partially<br />

blacked out to indicate levels of short-term risk. The FS also includes qualitative statements like:<br />

Workers would be protected during ROC remediation from Parcel C radiologically-impacted<br />

sites by implementing containment controls such as dust suppression and following health and<br />

safety protocols, including personal protective equipment and decontamination procedures.<br />

Page 26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!