14.12.2012 Views

PDF (361 K) - Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes - Paris 7

PDF (361 K) - Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes - Paris 7

PDF (361 K) - Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes - Paris 7

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 5 Calculated shapes of the vesicle inside the cylindrical nanochannel<br />

in a symm<strong>et</strong>ry plane (x,z). Top: G ¼ 0 (no adhesion) for the<br />

reduced tensions s ¼ 0, s ¼ 10, s ¼ 1 10 2 , s ¼ 1 10 3 , s ¼ 1 10 5 (from<br />

top to bottom). Bottom: G ¼ 2 for the same reduced tensions, however<br />

from bottom to top. In both cases, for s ¼ 1 10 5 the shape is almost<br />

a half-sphere.<br />

tension increases, the vesicle tends to a sphere of radius equal to<br />

the radius of the channel—except within a small region of size<br />

xO(k/s) close the channel walls.<br />

The deviation of the shape from a spherical cap of radius<br />

equal to the radius of the channel can be characterized by the<br />

normalized height h ¼ z(r ¼ 0)/a of the top of the vesicle with<br />

respect to the d<strong>et</strong>achment point (see Fig. 6). Increasing the<br />

adhesion energy at fixed tension reduces the height of the<br />

vesicle. When the adhesion energy G equals k/(2a 2 )(G ¼ 1/2),<br />

the vesicle becomes exactly a half-sphere with radius equal to<br />

the channel radius, whatever the tension. Indeed, according to<br />

eqn (11), for G ¼ k/(2a 2 ) the curvature at the d<strong>et</strong>achment point is<br />

1/a and a perfect sphere is always a solution of the shape<br />

equations. In this case, the pressure drop is related to the<br />

tension by the ordinary Laplace law; indeed, the curvature<br />

terms in eqn (2) vanish. At adhesion energies higher than k/(2a 2 )<br />

(G > 1/2), the vesicle develops an oblate shape that tends to<br />

a sphere as the tension increases (see Fig. 6 and bottom curves<br />

of Fig. 5).<br />

Fig. 6 The normalized height h of the top of the vesicle (with respect to<br />

the d<strong>et</strong>achment point) in the cylindrical nanochannel, as a function of the<br />

reduced tension s for different normalized adhesion energies G (G ¼ 0, G<br />

¼ 0.2, G ¼ 0.5, G ¼ 2, G ¼ 10). For G ¼ 1/2, the vesicle is a perfect halfsphere<br />

of radius a whatever the tension.<br />

Fig. 7 The normalized curvature c 0 of the top of the vesicle in a cylindrical<br />

channel, as a function of the normalized tension s, for G ¼ 10.<br />

Continuous line: numerical result; dashed line: analytical approximation<br />

c0 ¼ 1 G/s according to eqn (14). Ins<strong>et</strong>, continuous line: shape of the<br />

vesicle, in a symm<strong>et</strong>ry plane (x,z), for s ¼ 40. The dashed line corresponds<br />

to a spherical cap having the same curvature as the top of the<br />

vesicle.<br />

High tension and strong adhesion in the cylindrical nanochannel<br />

As predicted above, at tensions s [ k/a 2 the vesicle should have<br />

an almost spherical shape of radius given by eqn (14). We have<br />

checked this numerically in the strong adhesion case (G x s), for<br />

which the predicted radius differs significantly from the radius<br />

a of the channel (see Fig. 7). When G > s, we find numerically<br />

that the curvature of the top of the vesicle becomes negative (the<br />

membrane invaginates), in agreement with eqn (14).<br />

Deviation from the naive prediction using the ordinary Laplace<br />

law<br />

We consider the general conical channel case of Fig. 3. The<br />

ordinary Laplace law, that neglects the curvature energy, would<br />

predict a pressure drop dPnaive ¼ (2scosa)/a, corresponding to<br />

a spherical cap of radius a/cosa matching tangentially the conical<br />

channel. In our normalized units, this yields pnaive ¼ 2scosa.<br />

Curvature and adhesion energies introduce the corrections displayed<br />

in eqn (18), and cannot be evaluated analytically for a s<br />

0. Fig. 8 shows the deviation p p naive, in the absence of adhesion,<br />

for different cone angles a. For a cylindrical channel<br />

(a ¼ 0), according to eqn (9), the deviation is p p naive ¼ 1,<br />

independent of the tension. On the other hand, for a conical<br />

nanochannel (a s 0), the deviation p pnaive increases as the<br />

tension increases. Asymptotically, for s [ 1, we find that p<br />

pnaive f s 0.5 ; therefore, the relative error (p pnaive)/pnaive x (p<br />

pnaive)/s tends to zero as 1/Os. At small tensions (s ( 1), the<br />

deviation p pnaive is almost independent of the tension; the ins<strong>et</strong><br />

of Fig. 8 shows the extrapolated deviation in the limit s / 0,<br />

which is maximum for a x 48 .<br />

3.3 Validation of the force equilibrium analysis<br />

Here, we show that the relations previously deduced from the<br />

force equilibrium analysis can be recovered directly from the<br />

shape eqn (22)–(25) and the boundary conditions shown in eqn<br />

(26)–(29).<br />

2468 | Soft Matter, 2008, 4, 2463–2470 This journal is ª The Royal Soci<strong>et</strong>y of Chemistry 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!