10.05.2018 Views

Airport Masterplan 2035 LOW RES

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Masterplan</strong> <strong>2035</strong><br />

8.12 This <strong>Masterplan</strong> proposes to safeguard for a possible<br />

runway extension should the need arise, but does not<br />

destinations that could be achieved are shown in Figure<br />

16, although we do not expect there to be demand for all<br />

l A reduction in engine power at take-off would likely result<br />

in lower noise emittance.<br />

8.16 There are number of implications which would stem from<br />

such a possible extension –<br />

8.19 The current runway capacity is 30 aircraft movements<br />

an hour in total, with no more than 18 departures and 12<br />

8.21 The location of the terminal at one end of the runway does<br />

not make for the most efficient airside operation as taxiways<br />

necessarily represent an intention to build one. In the event<br />

of these to be served.<br />

that an extension were to go ahead, the following benefits<br />

l The potential for dedicated cargo operations would be<br />

could result –<br />

improved, with larger aircraft and/or heavier payloads a<br />

l Some existing aircraft types will be able to operate<br />

possibility. This is especially true for one-off shipments<br />

to their maximum capability with others able to carry<br />

by companies meeting the bespoke needs of their<br />

passenger/cargo loads with only limited restrictions.<br />

customers.<br />

In the event that hoped for, but as yet unknown,<br />

l The efficiency of aircraft on existing routes served from<br />

improvements in aircraft performance do not materialise,<br />

the <strong>Airport</strong> would likely be improved with a longer takeoff<br />

run requiring less engine power and so a lower fuel<br />

then this substantial increase in length would allow<br />

for all destinations we anticipate we could fly to in the<br />

burn. This will improve the economic and environmental<br />

future, without commercially unviable restrictions. The<br />

performance of flights.<br />

Figure 16 – Aircraft Range Performance on Extended Runway<br />

8.13 Figure 17 shows the range which would be achievable on<br />

the extended runway for different existing aircraft types<br />

operating at around 80% of the maximum take-off weight<br />

for each type, accounting that a full fuel load and /or full<br />

passenger/cargo may not always be needed.<br />

8.14 The current width of the runway and taxiways would not<br />

allow for the operation of the Airbus A380. However, we<br />

do not expect to have this aircraft type operating from the<br />

<strong>Airport</strong> within the <strong>Masterplan</strong> period, with any new long<br />

haul routes utilising smaller, twin engine aircraft. As such<br />

we consider that this restriction will not hinder our future<br />

growth.<br />

8.15 In order to safeguard for the possibility of a runway<br />

extension and to ensure that Local Authorities also<br />

make provision for it in their development plans and in<br />

determining planning applications for housing and other<br />

noise sensitive development in the local area, we have<br />

made an assumption that it would be implemented by<br />

<strong>2035</strong>. This is shown on the <strong>2035</strong> key diagram. We have also<br />

produced noise contours for <strong>2035</strong> that take account of both<br />

l The runway would extend onto agricultural land which<br />

is currently within the Green Belt. However, we believe<br />

that the openness of the Green Belt would be preserved<br />

as well as the separation of settlements. Combined with<br />

the economic benefits the development would bring,<br />

we think there is a compelling case for very special<br />

circumstances so that the development could be<br />

supported, as per paragraphs 79-92 of the NPPF.<br />

l This land is not under the <strong>Airport</strong>’s ownership. Should<br />

a runway extension go ahead, the <strong>Airport</strong> Company will<br />

seek the purchase of this land by negotiation, but it does<br />

have compulsory purchase powers as a last resort.<br />

l There would be a change to arrivals and departures<br />

which would result in aircraft being at different heights<br />

than they currently are when flying over certain areas.<br />

This will result in a slightly larger population potentially<br />

being impacted by aircraft noise. This is addressed in<br />

section 10.<br />

l The Public Safety Zone at the eastern end of the runway<br />

would move, resulting in land to the North of Brunswick<br />

Village being subject to development restrictions.<br />

arrivals (or vice versa). Corresponding with the peaks and<br />

troughs of terminal passenger throughput, there are times<br />

when aircraft movements are concentrated. However,<br />

analysis of our forecast peak day schedules indicates that<br />

future demand can be comfortably accommodated within<br />

the existing runway capacity. It is therefore not considered<br />

that there is any need for an additional runway up to <strong>2035</strong>.<br />

Indeed there are many single runway airports which operate<br />

well in excess of our projected future passengers numbers.<br />

8.20 Although there is sufficient capacity to provide for growth,<br />

we will consider making improvements to make sure use<br />

of current infrastructure is as efficient as possible, and so<br />

maximise use of the existing airfield.<br />

mix with aircraft stands in quite a confined space. This can<br />

sometimes delay arriving aircraft getting onto their stand or<br />

restrict use of taxiways when departing aircraft are pushing<br />

back. Two definite pinch points have been identified.<br />

8.22 At present the <strong>Airport</strong> has a ‘holding taxiway’ at the western<br />

end of the runway for aircraft ready to depart. They will hold<br />

on this area until given clearance for take-off by ATC. There<br />

is currently only space for 2 narrow body aircraft to wait at<br />

any one time, as any more results in access to the stands<br />

south of the pier being blocked. This can result in aircraft<br />

waiting on stands longer than is necessary. A widening of<br />

this taxiway would allow for dual queuing and so improve<br />

the efficiency of the airfield, as shown in Figure 17.<br />

the growth of the <strong>Airport</strong> and a possible runway extension.<br />

These contours will assist the Local Authorities in ensuring<br />

that no housing and other noise sensitive developments<br />

go ahead in locations that might prevent the <strong>Airport</strong> from<br />

growing in the future. Future improvements in aircraft<br />

technology might mean that the extension isn’t needed until<br />

Runway and Taxiway Capacity<br />

8.17 The capacity of the runway dictates how many aircraft<br />

can safely operate in a given period. It is measured in<br />

movements per hour, and can be influenced by a number of<br />

factors such as aircraft type, weather, taxiway provision, air<br />

space restrictions, and safety and regulatory requirements.<br />

after <strong>2035</strong>, if at all, but it is important for both the <strong>Airport</strong>,<br />

and the future connectivity and economic growth of the<br />

North East region, that we safeguard for this possibility.<br />

8.18 The <strong>Airport</strong> currently has two rapid exit taxiways to allow<br />

for aircraft to clear the runway as quickly as possible after<br />

landing, and a parallel taxiway, which removes the necessity<br />

for aircraft to taxi on the runway itself. These features<br />

provide quite a high existing capacity for our single runway.<br />

38<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!