ECA Review 2018-06-14

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6 J u n e 1 4 ' 1 8 H A n n A / C o r o n a t i o n / S t e t t l e r , A b . E C A r e v i e w 3” wide version Why build a pipeline if we prohibit oil tanker traffic? by Ken Green Senior director of Natural Resource Studies, The Fraser Institute While the Trans Mountain pipeline saga grabs headlines across the country, Bill C-48, which indefinitely bans most oil tankers loading or unloading anywhere on British Columbia’s north coast, recently had its third reading in Parliament. The bill, which must still pass through the Senate, erects yet another barrier to exporting Canadian oil to markets in Asia, where that oil can command a significantly higher price than it does today when sold in a glutted (and shrinking) American market. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his ministers frequently invoke science when justifying environmental policies. The prime minister even sat down for an interview with Bill Nye (“the Science Guy”), who lectured him on the need to terminate Alberta oilsands production and stop pipeline construction. The new Canadian Environmental Assessment process, ushered in by the federal government claims it will use the “best available science” in its decision-making. But it’s hard to see how anyone can justify, based on the science, Bill Viewpoint C-48’s tanker moratorium, because any review of the data on oil tanker safety would dispel the idea that this policy is evidence-based. In 2015, a Fraser Institute study found that moving oil by tankers is not only safe but that the safety of this mode has increased even as greater quantities of oil are transported by sea. Canada, in particular, has a superb record of tanker safety. According to Transport Canada, there has only been one major oil spill in the last 20 years off Canada’s West Coast and it did not involve an oil tanker. (The Queen of the North ferry sank with 240 tonnes of oil on board.) The trend for tanker safety is also very good. In the 1970s, there were on average 24.5 large spills (more than 700 tonnes) per year worldwide. But in the first four years of the 2010s, on an average there were only two large spills per year. The trend for medium-sized spills (seven to 700 tonnes) also declined significantly, from an average of 54.3 per year in the 1970s to an average of five per year during the first part of the 2010s. In addition, of all the oil spilled at sea from 1970 to 2009, 56.0 per cent was spilled in the 1970s, 20.5 per cent in the 1980s, Reinforced optimism from Canada’s capital 19.8 per cent in the 1990s and only 3.7 per cent in the 2000s. And remember, these reductions in accidents and amount of oil spilled each year coincide with increased amounts of oil shipped by sea. In 1970, 1,207 million tonnes of loaded crude oil was transported by sea compared to an estimated 1,710 million tonnes in 2014. We can and do transport oil safely by tankers - even as we increase the amount of oil we ship. The International Energy Agency projects that Asia’s demand for oil will increase from 4.7 million barrels per day today to an estimated 6.6 million barrels per day in 2040. Without access to the Asian market, Canada will miss out on the economic prosperity intrinsic to supplying those markets with oil produced in a country with some of the world’s best environmental protections. Imposing a moratorium on oil tanker traffic off B.C.’s coast ignores the evidence about the safety of transporting oil by sea. This ban will stifle Canada’s ability to realize the economic benefits of exporting our resources to where there’s greatest demand. Squeeze Squeeze the MOST out of your advertising dollars Place your ad here AND province 12345 wide with a combined circulation of over 800,000 for only... Everyone who loves Linda is glad she got a mammogram. Because her breast cancer was found early, she is alive and well today. www.screeningforlife.ca $ 995 plus GST/HST Value Ad Network Alberta Weekly Newspapers Association 780-434-8746 x228 (toll free 1-800-282-6903) email classifieds@awna.com or stop by this community newspaper 3” wide version 3.75” wide version the MOST out of your advertising dollars Place your ad here AND 12345 province wide $ 995 plus GST/HST Value Ad Network with a combined circulation of over 800,000 for only... Alberta Weekly Newspapers Association 780-434-8746 x228 (toll free 1-800-282-6903) email classifieds@awna.com or stop by this community newspaper © Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, 2017 | The heart and / Icon on its own or followed by another icon or words in English are trademarks of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. 3.75” wide version value-ad-template.indt 1 7/22/11 11:3 Visit Screen Test in: Coronation July 11 - 14 Consort July 16 - 17 Castor July 18 - 20 Call for an appointment 1-800-667-0604 (toll-free) © Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, 2017 | The heart and / Icon on its own or followed by another icon or words in English are trademarks of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Women aged 50 to 74 should plan to have a screening mammogram every 2 years, and can self-refer. Women 40-49 may be screened annually with a referral for their first mammogram. Cont’d from Pg 3 Their myopic conceit makes them blind to the fact that they can indulge themselves in this behavior only because the society, with its structures, underlying wealth and Judeo/ Christian values, they despise and classify as repressive or unjust, provides them the capacity so to do. They are “Rebels without a Cause”. Perpetual “Peter Pan” type undergraduates, petulantly interpreting the gilded age they live in as a gilded cage. Make no mistake, the Ontario result is a bellwether for Alberta. The result humiliated the Ontario Liberals; they lost 51 of their 58 seats. The Alberta NDP currently have 54; previously they held just 4. Both the Liberals and the NDP believed they could run up deficits, impose higher taxes, impose job-killing regulations and badly interfere with the energy business, resulting in higher prices. Moreover, we see their potentially ideologically driven activity within the school system. For example, they are determined to rewrite the entire K-12 curriculum in just a couple of years. Previously, the rewrite of the math curriculum alone took 6 years. Fulsome thought and discussion cannot take place in such a short time period. This unseemly, and inherently flawed rush betrays that they can implement an agenda. Importantly for Albertan UCP supporters we now have, in Premier Doug Ford, a new and powerful ally opposed to the Federal Carbon Tax to add to Premier Scott Moe and his Saskatchewan Party. Jason Kenney has stated that, if elected, he will make Bill 1, of an early sitting Legislative Session, the Carbon Tax Repeal Act. June 7 saw the second anniversary of the imposition of this tax. Some observations: The tax was never part of the NDP’s election platform; therefore, it has no popular legitimacy. The tax was supposed to obtain “social license” for projects. Yet, 2 of 3 pipelines were kiboshed. The tax was supposed to be ring fenced for the environment. It is now an NDP slush fund. Clearly, when the NDP promise something, they mislead Albertans – and when they do not, it is even worse. This tax has achieved nothing but make life more expensive for all Albertans. Worse still, it hits lower earners, the vulnerable and seniors disproportionately harder. School Divisions are facing hard choices between heating and transport versus teaching posts, Educational Assistants and programs. Kindergarten programs are being scrapped. Some Senior Centres and non-profit organizations may close or curtail services due to a rise in costs. 55% of household budget costs increased. Their rebate being less (or non-existent) versus the tax increase. 73% of small businesses face increased costs. This, coupled with a compulsory minimum wage increase, is a death sentence for some. Last week’s Ontario result has reinforced my optimism in our future. If a majority progressive province like Ontario can “go blue” a blue province should, God willing, revert to type. Yet, no one is counting his or her chickens. The UCP will stay humble, listen to Albertans and produce sensible policies for the many, and not the few.
S E N I O R S E C A r e v i e w H A N N A / C o r o N A t i o n / S t e t t l e r , A b J u N E 1 4 ' 1 8 7 At the Three Hills-based Seniors Outreach annual general meeting on June 5, in Three Hills, Ab., board elections and administration reports topped the agenda. Board members, administrators and employees include, from the left, Rhoda Murray, board chair, Marsha Flewelling, Joyce Penner, Sherry Berry, Lorna Steeves, Ella Lammle, Brian Richard, Ross Gaehring, Steve Estabrooks, Daniel Pliva and Terry Schlinker. ECA Review/D. Nadeau Seniors outreach AGM focuses on elections, reports David Nadeau ECA Review It’s the statistics that make a Seniors Outreach annual general meeting (AGM) so interesting. At this year’s session, the 2017 review shows impressive numbers—155 volunteers, 9,556 volunteer hours, and over 13,000 requests for service. Seniors Outreach, a 23-yearold Three Hills-based social service organization, assists Kneehill County seniors and families. The AGM, held in the society’s drop in center on Tues. June 5, saw Brian Richard and Daniel Pliva elected to the board of directors. Board chair Rhoda Murray reviewed major society initiatives and lead administrator Terry Schlinker made special comment on newspaper publisher Tim Shearlaw’s World Elder Abuse fundraising effort that realized more than $60,000 to help the organization meet its financial direction and goals. Seniors Outreach, a community-based, non-profit organization, employs two community relations coordinators—Lorna Steeves is responsible for Trochu, Torrington, Wimborne, and Huxley, while Sherry Berry’s territory covers Acme, Carbon, and Linden. Caring for you & your Smile! Formally Formerly Baird Denture Clinic • Dentures • Implant Dentures • Partials • Relines/Repairs We offer out of office appointments to senior lodges Ca FR E a G David Ho, DD (owner/manager) Over 10 Years experience Call now for your FREE consultation! OFFICE HOURS: MONDAY TO THURSDAY - 9 A.M. TO 5 P.M. FRIDAY - 9 A.M. TO 3 P.M. 403.742.2351 • 5021-50 St. Stettler *After hours available by appointment only at 587.736.0128* Awareness Day AHS Wellness World Elder Abuse Awareness Day is every year on June 15. Drawing awareness about the abuse elders face can help the abuse end. Elder abuse can take many forms and affect any older adult, regardless of their background, health or heritage. Theft or financial control is the most common form of elder abuse but it can also be emotional, psychological, physical, sexual or neglect. Learn the signs, break the silence Some signs that could show up are unexplained injuries, changes in mood, changes in behaviour or physical status. Other possible signs could include changes in weight or appetite, hygiene or increased visits to the doctor or hospital. Education is a big part of preventing elder abuse. The more families, friends and communities know about the signs of elder abuse, the more support can be provided and gives people the confidence to speak up if they fall victim to such abuse. Forms of elder abuse In order to prevent and counter elder abuse, it’s important to know how to recognize it. In honour of World Elder Abuse Awareness Day this June 15, take a moment to familiarize yourself with the different types of abuse seniors may experience. 1. Physical abuse Any act compromising the physical integrity or well-being of a person is considered abusive (e.g. pushing, forcefeeding, inadequately administering medication). 2. Psychological abuse Insulting, threatening, rejecting, isolating, manipulating and humiliating a person are some examples of psychologically abusive behaviour. 3. Material abuse Also known as financial abuse, material abuse refers to dishonestly obtaining or using so me one else’s property. Pushing an elderly person to modify his or her will or asking for excessive payment after providing a service are two examples. 4. Organizational abuse Organizational procedures that cause harm to older people, such as providing services in a rough manner, constitute abuse. 5. Sexual abuse All actions, comments and demeanours that negatively impact a person’s sexual identity or well-being are considered to be acts of abuse. Finally, discriminating against someone based on his or her age (ageism) is also a form of abuse.
Page 1 and 2: 9 9 9 9 R* See Stettler GM for deta
Page 3 and 4: E C A r e v i e w H A N N A / C o
Page 5: E C A r e v i e w H A N N A / C o
Page 13 and 14: E EC CA A r re ev vi ei ew w W h e
Page 17 and 18: E C A r e v i e w c l a s s i f i

ECA Review 2018-06-14

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?