modifications to the harbor porpoise take reduction plan - Northeast ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

� Floatline Length: Less than or equal to 2,118 ft (645.6 m) � Twine Size: Greater than or equal to 0.81 mm (0.031 inches) � Tie-Downs: Prohibited � Net Number: Not to exceed 45 nets per vessel � Net Size: No longer than 300 ft (91.4 m or 50 fathoms) � Number of nets per string: Not to exceed 7 nets per string � Net Tagging: Requires all nets to be tagged by January 1, 2000 20
Figure 2-1: Alternative 1 (No Action) - Existing HPTRP Management Measures in New England 21
Page 1 and 2: MODIFICATIONS TO THE HARBOR PORPOIS
Page 3 and 4: 4.2.1.3 Closed Area Model (CAM)....
Page 5 and 6: Table 4-7: Percent of vessel affect
Page 7 and 8: 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Environmental
Page 9 and 10: The proposed modifications to the H
Page 11 and 12: fishery through the Magnuson-Steven
Page 13 and 14: information if two separate meeting
Page 15 and 16: term “management” in both New E
Page 17 and 18: small mesh nets, although 35% of th
Page 19 and 20: In New England, as Figure 1-2 shows
Page 21 and 22: 2.0 SUMMARY OF MANAGEMENT ALTERNATI
Page 23 and 24: Additionally, a provision will be i
Page 25: � Tie-Downs: Spaced not more than
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.2 Alternative 2: Closures Alter
Page 31 and 32: Figure 2-3: Alternative 2 - Immedia
Page 33 and 34: 2.2.3 Alternative 3: Pingers This a
Page 35 and 36: Figure 2-5: Alternative 3 - Expande
Page 37 and 38: 2.2.4 Alternative 4: Preferred Alte
Page 39 and 40: modifications to this FMP are being
Page 41 and 42: takes/mtons of landings, with an an
Page 43 and 44: ycatch rate reflecting compliance w
Page 45 and 46: Figure 2-8: Alternative 4 (Preferre
Page 47 and 48: Figure 2-9: Alternative 4 (Preferre
Page 49 and 50: closure period in 2007. This sugges
Page 51 and 52: Figure 2-10: Alternative 5 - Modifi
Page 53 and 54: Figure 2-12: Alternative 5 - Modifi
Page 55 and 56: South of Cape Hatteras, North Carol
Page 57 and 58: would adversely affect EFH, HAPC, r
Page 59 and 60: 3.2.2.1 Marine Mammals The followin
Page 61 and 62: the region during the peak feeding
Page 63 and 64: Decomposed and/or unexamined animal
Page 65 and 66: esulted in mortality. The other occ
Page 67 and 68: Table 3-4: U.S. Fishery-Related Mor
Page 69 and 70: The coastal morphotype of bottlenos
Page 71 and 72: annual surveys conducted in August
Page 73 and 74: Whitman and Payne, 1990; Barlas, 19
Page 75 and 76: Caribbean. Although the population
Page 77 and 78:
Kemp’s ridleys occur primarily in
Page 79 and 80:
3.2.2.3 Protected Fish Two listed s
Page 81 and 82:
The Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery, a
Page 83 and 84:
Table 3-8: Percentage of Northeast
Page 85 and 86:
the largest declines in total reven
Page 87 and 88:
Table 3-14: Average (2002-2006) dis
Page 89 and 90:
Table 4-1: A summary of average byc
Page 91 and 92:
4.1.1.2 Biological Effects of Alter
Page 93 and 94:
Closure Areas in New England, and t
Page 95 and 96:
which both closures and more string
Page 97 and 98:
The predicted bycatch rate ranges f
Page 99 and 100:
calculated based on the estimated b
Page 101 and 102:
Atlantic. If compliance is high, ha
Page 103 and 104:
of the OMA and SMA closure as well
Page 105 and 106:
However, a cost-effectiveness analy
Page 107 and 108:
The recent major changes implemente
Page 109 and 110:
To estimate the cost-effectiveness
Page 111 and 112:
Table 4-5: Percent change in profit
Page 113 and 114:
Table 4-7: Percent of vessel affect
Page 115 and 116:
Alt. 4-Both, Alt. 5-Both), a large
Page 117 and 118:
per year for Alt. 5-Pre to around $
Page 119 and 120:
(Table 4-12). However, for the alte
Page 121 and 122:
4.3 Cumulative Effects Analysis 4.3
Page 123 and 124:
also include disturbances to riveri
Page 125 and 126:
The past, present and reasonably fo
Page 127 and 128:
Carolina through Florida’s east c
Page 129 and 130:
ebuilding programs remained on trac
Page 131 and 132:
Amendment 5 to the Monkfish FMP is
Page 133 and 134:
Herring FMP Herring is an important
Page 135 and 136:
Cumulative Effects on Harbor Porpoi
Page 137 and 138:
effort reduction affects gillnet fi
Page 139 and 140:
Table 4-14: Summary of the effects
Page 141 and 142:
5.0 REGULATORY IMPACT REVIEW/ FINAL
Page 143 and 144:
The following alternatives are prop
Page 145 and 146:
Under Alternative 1 (No Action), th
Page 147 and 148:
6.3 Paperwork Reduction Act This ac
Page 149 and 150:
upon scientific information, analys
Page 151 and 152:
Proposed Action is significant unde
Page 153 and 154:
Although concerns have been express
Page 155 and 156:
2004). Additionally, the structures
Page 157 and 158:
suggesting the proposed changes to
Page 159 and 160:
Cox, T.M., A.J. Read, D. Swanner, K
Page 161 and 162:
Jacobs, S.R. and J.M. Terhune. 2000
Page 163 and 164:
Prepared by the New England Fishery
Page 165 and 166:
phocoena) bycatch and levels of com
Page 167 and 168:
Swingle, W.M., S.G. Barco, T.D. Pit
Page 169 and 170:
8.0 LIST OF ACRONYMS ALWTRP Atlanti
Page 171 and 172:
9.0 LIST OF PREPARERS AND CONTRIBUT
Page 173 and 174:
David Stevenson Marine Habitat Reso
Page 175 and 176:
Vicki Cornish The Ocean Conservancy
show all

modifications to the harbor porpoise take reduction plan - Northeast ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?