29.06.2018 Views

Peace in the Face of War

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that <strong>the</strong> catastrophic End <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world is draw<strong>in</strong>g nigh. This would be a<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>eless response, a betrayal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> task set before us. Each human be<strong>in</strong>g is<br />

sentenced to death. When ill-health or old age strikes, a person may not have<br />

<strong>the</strong> prospect before <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong> extensive time. But it does not follow from this<br />

personal eschatological awareness that a person should refuse any k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong><br />

activity or effort. Creative activity can even be heightened by it. The creative<br />

works that a person achieves are l<strong>in</strong>ked to existential time, not to worldy,<br />

historical time.<br />

Eschatology Realised: Div<strong>in</strong>e-human Co-operation The idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>evitable<br />

progress and <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>evitable regress are equally false. No such law <strong>of</strong><br />

progress or regress exists. This is <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> a false, determ<strong>in</strong>istic worldview,<br />

transposed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong> naturalistic categories. The problem<br />

<strong>of</strong> progress is a problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit and not a problem <strong>of</strong> natural processes.<br />

Progress, i.e. <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> improvement and ascent, is one set before <strong>the</strong><br />

human spirit, not some <strong>in</strong>herent, natural and historical process. In empirical<br />

history, progressive and regressive elements exist <strong>in</strong> equal measure, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>in</strong>fallible rule by which one must ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper hand over <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r. The 19 th century <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> progress, which <strong>in</strong> itself turned <strong>in</strong>to a k<strong>in</strong>d<br />

<strong>of</strong> religion, is false and does not correspond to reality. It is merely a <strong>the</strong>ory.<br />

But this <strong>in</strong> no way means that <strong>the</strong> reactionary opponents <strong>of</strong> progress are<br />

right. ‘Eschatological pessimism’ frequently serves <strong>the</strong> aims <strong>of</strong> reactionaries<br />

and misanthropes. This is <strong>the</strong> negative side <strong>of</strong> an apocalyptic outlook, and<br />

its destructive aspect. Here we must clear up an ambiguity. Such people tell<br />

us that Christian truth, <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> God on earth, is unrealisable, that<br />

no progress is possible, that evil only grows <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, that freedom only<br />

gives rise to evil. And so we ask ourselves: why do <strong>the</strong>y say, Christian truth<br />

is unrealisable? Is it because <strong>the</strong>y are aware <strong>of</strong> this unrealisability through<br />

experience <strong>of</strong> grief and affliction, or because <strong>the</strong>y do not wish it to be<br />

realised, and take a perverse delight <strong>in</strong> its not be<strong>in</strong>g realised? I am conv<strong>in</strong>ced<br />

that, at <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> reactionary attitudes ly<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d ‘eschatological<br />

pessimism’ persists a wish that <strong>the</strong> truth should not be realised, that man<br />

should not move forward or upward; that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> humank<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>re<br />

should be no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> freedom, justice, humanity.... Whenever people<br />

tell me that a more just, human social order is unrealisable, I always ask<br />

<strong>the</strong>m whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y would like it to be realised, or whe<strong>the</strong>r it is unrealisable<br />

because <strong>the</strong>y are do<strong>in</strong>g everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y can to prevent its be<strong>in</strong>g realised. I<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k that, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> cases, <strong>the</strong> latter is more probable.<br />

We must remember that <strong>the</strong> very idea <strong>of</strong> progress – however much it may<br />

have been used aga<strong>in</strong>st Christianity – is <strong>of</strong> Christian orig<strong>in</strong> and is connected<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!