Peace in the Face of War
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
that <strong>the</strong> catastrophic End <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world is draw<strong>in</strong>g nigh. This would be a<br />
sp<strong>in</strong>eless response, a betrayal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> task set before us. Each human be<strong>in</strong>g is<br />
sentenced to death. When ill-health or old age strikes, a person may not have<br />
<strong>the</strong> prospect before <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong> extensive time. But it does not follow from this<br />
personal eschatological awareness that a person should refuse any k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong><br />
activity or effort. Creative activity can even be heightened by it. The creative<br />
works that a person achieves are l<strong>in</strong>ked to existential time, not to worldy,<br />
historical time.<br />
Eschatology Realised: Div<strong>in</strong>e-human Co-operation The idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>evitable<br />
progress and <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>evitable regress are equally false. No such law <strong>of</strong><br />
progress or regress exists. This is <strong>the</strong> product <strong>of</strong> a false, determ<strong>in</strong>istic worldview,<br />
transposed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong> naturalistic categories. The problem<br />
<strong>of</strong> progress is a problem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spirit and not a problem <strong>of</strong> natural processes.<br />
Progress, i.e. <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> improvement and ascent, is one set before <strong>the</strong><br />
human spirit, not some <strong>in</strong>herent, natural and historical process. In empirical<br />
history, progressive and regressive elements exist <strong>in</strong> equal measure, and<br />
<strong>the</strong>re is no <strong>in</strong>fallible rule by which one must ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> upper hand over <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r. The 19 th century <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> progress, which <strong>in</strong> itself turned <strong>in</strong>to a k<strong>in</strong>d<br />
<strong>of</strong> religion, is false and does not correspond to reality. It is merely a <strong>the</strong>ory.<br />
But this <strong>in</strong> no way means that <strong>the</strong> reactionary opponents <strong>of</strong> progress are<br />
right. ‘Eschatological pessimism’ frequently serves <strong>the</strong> aims <strong>of</strong> reactionaries<br />
and misanthropes. This is <strong>the</strong> negative side <strong>of</strong> an apocalyptic outlook, and<br />
its destructive aspect. Here we must clear up an ambiguity. Such people tell<br />
us that Christian truth, <strong>the</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gdom <strong>of</strong> God on earth, is unrealisable, that<br />
no progress is possible, that evil only grows <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, that freedom only<br />
gives rise to evil. And so we ask ourselves: why do <strong>the</strong>y say, Christian truth<br />
is unrealisable? Is it because <strong>the</strong>y are aware <strong>of</strong> this unrealisability through<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> grief and affliction, or because <strong>the</strong>y do not wish it to be<br />
realised, and take a perverse delight <strong>in</strong> its not be<strong>in</strong>g realised? I am conv<strong>in</strong>ced<br />
that, at <strong>the</strong> basis <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> reactionary attitudes ly<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d ‘eschatological<br />
pessimism’ persists a wish that <strong>the</strong> truth should not be realised, that man<br />
should not move forward or upward; that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> humank<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong>re<br />
should be no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> freedom, justice, humanity.... Whenever people<br />
tell me that a more just, human social order is unrealisable, I always ask<br />
<strong>the</strong>m whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y would like it to be realised, or whe<strong>the</strong>r it is unrealisable<br />
because <strong>the</strong>y are do<strong>in</strong>g everyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y can to prevent its be<strong>in</strong>g realised. I<br />
th<strong>in</strong>k that, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> cases, <strong>the</strong> latter is more probable.<br />
We must remember that <strong>the</strong> very idea <strong>of</strong> progress – however much it may<br />
have been used aga<strong>in</strong>st Christianity – is <strong>of</strong> Christian orig<strong>in</strong> and is connected<br />
24