04.07.2018 Views

SportEngland_AR_17_18

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fraud risks<br />

There is a risk to grant giving bodies of fraud<br />

occurring while undertaking their day-to-day grant<br />

giving process through which funds are made<br />

available to third parties. No matter how effective<br />

the controls and checks, which are in place and<br />

followed by the grant giving body, there remains a<br />

possibility that fraud may occur.<br />

To manage these risks, Sport England has a<br />

Counter Fraud Strategy and a Fraud and Bribery<br />

Prevention Policy which was reviewed and updated<br />

in January 20<strong>18</strong>.<br />

During the 20<strong>17</strong>-<strong>18</strong> financial year there have<br />

been only three cases raised where fraud has<br />

been suspected concerning grant recipient<br />

organisations, or concerning individuals in<br />

management positions at recipient organisations.<br />

Two of these cases were closed after no evidence<br />

of fraud or attempted fraud were found and<br />

the other has been passed to the police for<br />

investigation. A fraud register is maintained within<br />

Sport England that monitors past and present<br />

cases, their status and final outcomes and<br />

quarterly updates are presented to the Audit Risk<br />

and Governance Committee.<br />

Independent assurance<br />

Internal Audit provides me with an objective<br />

evaluation of, and opinion on, the overall adequacy<br />

and effectiveness of the organisation’s framework<br />

of governance, risk management and internal<br />

control processes.<br />

An annual programme of internal audit work<br />

is carried out to professional standards by an<br />

external firm of accountants informed by the Risk<br />

Register, and an assessment of my assurance<br />

requirements. Internal Auditors attend each Audit,<br />

Risk & Governance Committee meeting and<br />

provide periodic progress reports which include<br />

the findings of follow-up reviews, culminating in<br />

an annual report to the Committee on internal<br />

audit activity. The Audit, Risk and Governance<br />

Committee also considers the External Audit Plan<br />

and reports from the National Audit Office.<br />

The internal auditors are Mazars LLP, who were<br />

appointed jointly by Sport England and UK Sport<br />

to provide internal audit services, which includes<br />

fulfilling the role of Head of Internal Audit, to both<br />

sports councils for the period from 1 April 2015 to<br />

31 March 20<strong>18</strong>.<br />

Mazars LLP have concluded in their opinion<br />

that, during 20<strong>17</strong>-<strong>18</strong>, overall there has been an<br />

adequate and effective framework of governance,<br />

risk management and control that provides<br />

reasonable assurance over the achievement<br />

of objectives. Certain weaknesses and exceptions<br />

were highlighted as part of the audit work,<br />

none of which were fundamental in nature.<br />

A number of recommendations were made, all of<br />

these have been, or are in the process of being<br />

addressed.<br />

In addition to the assurance from internal audit,<br />

Moore Stephens LLP carry out a number of on-site<br />

management audits to provide assurance over our<br />

grant funding to national governing bodies, national<br />

partners, County Sports Partnerships and other<br />

significant grants in terms of size or complexity.<br />

The timing and scope of the on-site audits reflect<br />

their assessment of the organisations’ governance,<br />

risk and internal control frameworks. The process<br />

for assessing compliance with the Code for Sports<br />

Governance has been informed by evidence from<br />

these audits and other independent sources such<br />

as Companies House records.<br />

We also obtain assurance for our capital<br />

programmes from surveyors’ reports, independent<br />

project monitors and comparisons of leisure<br />

facilities services under a benchmarking service.<br />

Many of our capital grants extend for significant<br />

periods, often up to 25 years and therefore it is<br />

important to obtain assurance that the facility is<br />

being utilised for the purpose originally intended.<br />

The Active Lives Adult Survey data is prepared<br />

and quality checked by Ipsos MORI, with data<br />

also shared with analysts at DCMS, Public Health<br />

England and DfT in advance of publication. As<br />

well as extensive user consultation and testing,<br />

the design of the Active Lives child survey and<br />

questionnaire is being developed by a steering<br />

group comprised of policy experts from DCMS,<br />

DfE and DHSE. Sheffield Hallam University is also<br />

completing a validation study on key aspects of the<br />

child questionnaire.<br />

A panel of academic experts independently<br />

reviewed the Sport Outcomes Evidence Review<br />

published in May 20<strong>17</strong>, with the future direction<br />

of this work also being overseen by a group of<br />

independent academics and practitioners.<br />

Complaints<br />

Through our formal complaints procedure we have<br />

recorded 36 complaints in 20<strong>17</strong>-20<strong>18</strong>, of which we<br />

had one complaint referred to the Parliamentary<br />

and Health Services Ombudsman which was not<br />

upheld.<br />

Whistleblowing<br />

Sport England has a Whistleblowing policy<br />

and procedure that is reviewed annually for<br />

effectiveness and to ensure it is in line with good<br />

practice. The last review was undertaken in April<br />

20<strong>18</strong>. There were no whistleblowing complaints in<br />

20<strong>17</strong>-<strong>18</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!