SportEngland_AR_17_18
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fraud risks<br />
There is a risk to grant giving bodies of fraud<br />
occurring while undertaking their day-to-day grant<br />
giving process through which funds are made<br />
available to third parties. No matter how effective<br />
the controls and checks, which are in place and<br />
followed by the grant giving body, there remains a<br />
possibility that fraud may occur.<br />
To manage these risks, Sport England has a<br />
Counter Fraud Strategy and a Fraud and Bribery<br />
Prevention Policy which was reviewed and updated<br />
in January 20<strong>18</strong>.<br />
During the 20<strong>17</strong>-<strong>18</strong> financial year there have<br />
been only three cases raised where fraud has<br />
been suspected concerning grant recipient<br />
organisations, or concerning individuals in<br />
management positions at recipient organisations.<br />
Two of these cases were closed after no evidence<br />
of fraud or attempted fraud were found and<br />
the other has been passed to the police for<br />
investigation. A fraud register is maintained within<br />
Sport England that monitors past and present<br />
cases, their status and final outcomes and<br />
quarterly updates are presented to the Audit Risk<br />
and Governance Committee.<br />
Independent assurance<br />
Internal Audit provides me with an objective<br />
evaluation of, and opinion on, the overall adequacy<br />
and effectiveness of the organisation’s framework<br />
of governance, risk management and internal<br />
control processes.<br />
An annual programme of internal audit work<br />
is carried out to professional standards by an<br />
external firm of accountants informed by the Risk<br />
Register, and an assessment of my assurance<br />
requirements. Internal Auditors attend each Audit,<br />
Risk & Governance Committee meeting and<br />
provide periodic progress reports which include<br />
the findings of follow-up reviews, culminating in<br />
an annual report to the Committee on internal<br />
audit activity. The Audit, Risk and Governance<br />
Committee also considers the External Audit Plan<br />
and reports from the National Audit Office.<br />
The internal auditors are Mazars LLP, who were<br />
appointed jointly by Sport England and UK Sport<br />
to provide internal audit services, which includes<br />
fulfilling the role of Head of Internal Audit, to both<br />
sports councils for the period from 1 April 2015 to<br />
31 March 20<strong>18</strong>.<br />
Mazars LLP have concluded in their opinion<br />
that, during 20<strong>17</strong>-<strong>18</strong>, overall there has been an<br />
adequate and effective framework of governance,<br />
risk management and control that provides<br />
reasonable assurance over the achievement<br />
of objectives. Certain weaknesses and exceptions<br />
were highlighted as part of the audit work,<br />
none of which were fundamental in nature.<br />
A number of recommendations were made, all of<br />
these have been, or are in the process of being<br />
addressed.<br />
In addition to the assurance from internal audit,<br />
Moore Stephens LLP carry out a number of on-site<br />
management audits to provide assurance over our<br />
grant funding to national governing bodies, national<br />
partners, County Sports Partnerships and other<br />
significant grants in terms of size or complexity.<br />
The timing and scope of the on-site audits reflect<br />
their assessment of the organisations’ governance,<br />
risk and internal control frameworks. The process<br />
for assessing compliance with the Code for Sports<br />
Governance has been informed by evidence from<br />
these audits and other independent sources such<br />
as Companies House records.<br />
We also obtain assurance for our capital<br />
programmes from surveyors’ reports, independent<br />
project monitors and comparisons of leisure<br />
facilities services under a benchmarking service.<br />
Many of our capital grants extend for significant<br />
periods, often up to 25 years and therefore it is<br />
important to obtain assurance that the facility is<br />
being utilised for the purpose originally intended.<br />
The Active Lives Adult Survey data is prepared<br />
and quality checked by Ipsos MORI, with data<br />
also shared with analysts at DCMS, Public Health<br />
England and DfT in advance of publication. As<br />
well as extensive user consultation and testing,<br />
the design of the Active Lives child survey and<br />
questionnaire is being developed by a steering<br />
group comprised of policy experts from DCMS,<br />
DfE and DHSE. Sheffield Hallam University is also<br />
completing a validation study on key aspects of the<br />
child questionnaire.<br />
A panel of academic experts independently<br />
reviewed the Sport Outcomes Evidence Review<br />
published in May 20<strong>17</strong>, with the future direction<br />
of this work also being overseen by a group of<br />
independent academics and practitioners.<br />
Complaints<br />
Through our formal complaints procedure we have<br />
recorded 36 complaints in 20<strong>17</strong>-20<strong>18</strong>, of which we<br />
had one complaint referred to the Parliamentary<br />
and Health Services Ombudsman which was not<br />
upheld.<br />
Whistleblowing<br />
Sport England has a Whistleblowing policy<br />
and procedure that is reviewed annually for<br />
effectiveness and to ensure it is in line with good<br />
practice. The last review was undertaken in April<br />
20<strong>18</strong>. There were no whistleblowing complaints in<br />
20<strong>17</strong>-<strong>18</strong>.