Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Office <strong>of</strong> Airspace Regulation Page 32 <strong>of</strong> 69<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
the proximity <strong>of</strong> R574 (formally R595) boundary is an issue for GPS<br />
approaches. Stakeholders have requested that the military review<br />
and try to move the boundary slightly to accommodate the<br />
approaches;<br />
clearance through military restricted areas should be available for PT<br />
aircraft when essential due to severe weather conditions (other than<br />
having to declare an emergency);<br />
(The OAR makes the following additional comments - Expedition<br />
<strong>of</strong> clearances through Restricted Airspace is already managed by the<br />
airspace controlling authority in accordance with procedures detailed<br />
within the Manual <strong>of</strong> Air Traffic Services (MATS). These procedures<br />
take into account diversion requests through Restricted Areas due to<br />
severe weather.)<br />
the LSALT (Lowest Safe Altitude) within 25 NM <strong>of</strong> PMQ is<br />
5,300 ft AMSL, and 4,500 ft AMSL within 25 NM <strong>of</strong> TRE;<br />
the possibility <strong>of</strong> a Class E airspace corridor, using BN Radar, (Lower<br />
Limit <strong>of</strong> 4,500 ft AMSL), would provide IFR to IFR separation within<br />
this area; directed traffic information-radar information service (DTI-<br />
RIS) about known VFR aircraft to IFR; and a VFR traffic (on request)<br />
service to VFR aircraft above the Class E base;<br />
Class E airspace LL (base) 4,500 ft AMSL would still not provide<br />
additional services in the CTAF procedural area or at the<br />
aerodromes. However it would provide additional services from the<br />
current Class E airspace base <strong>of</strong> 8,500 ft AMSL (an additional<br />
4,000 ft AMSL <strong>of</strong> protection); and<br />
if a Class E airspace corridor was considered it could possibly be<br />
confined to an arc that encompasses the standard arrival and<br />
departures tracks to/from PMQ/TRE (i.e. in via NICLA and out via<br />
SORTI).<br />
5.7 PMQ/TRE CTAF Frequency Congestion<br />
The VHF allocated to the PMQ CTAF is 118.1 MHz. This frequency is also allocated<br />
to operations at TRE aerodrome located South <strong>of</strong> PMQ and also allocated to<br />
operations at KMP aerodrome which is located 23 NM North West <strong>of</strong> PMQ.<br />
There have been numerous reports by pilots <strong>of</strong> frequency congestion occurring on<br />
the CTAF 118.1 MHz.<br />
Aircraft on the ground at any one <strong>of</strong> the three aerodromes in this location (PMQ, TRE<br />
or KMP) are generally unable to hear other aircraft transmitting on the ground at any<br />
<strong>of</strong> the other two aerodromes and consequently can unintentionally broadcast on the<br />
frequency at the same time as another aircraft is broadcasting. A pilot may be<br />
unaware that the transmission just made was over transmitted by another aircraft.<br />
It was also reported that pilots operating at PMQ, TRE or KMP need to determine<br />
which broadcasts are pertinent to the aerodrome that they are operating at. The<br />
irrelevant traffic can be discounted only if the location is contained in the broadcast.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> both TRE and PMQ at similar times gives rise to considerations <strong>of</strong><br />
splitting the CTAF frequency (118.1 MHz) between the ports. However, this would<br />
create problems with situational awareness <strong>of</strong> possible conflictions between the two<br />
ports.<br />
Airspace Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Macquarie</strong> (YPMQ) May 2010 Version 1.0