16.12.2012 Views

Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Office <strong>of</strong> Airspace Regulation Page 46 <strong>of</strong> 69<br />

A/c1 (V, L, M or H) V L L L M M M M M H H H H H H H<br />

A/c2 (V, L, M or H) V V L L V L L M M V L L M M H H<br />

VMC or IMC V V V I V V I V I V V I V I V I<br />

RISK REDUCTION SERIES 1 (Percentage compared to base case = 100 (98 is little reduction 12 is much risk reduction))<br />

Basic CTAF 95 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

CTAF 95 wirth DTI 99 98 76 76 99 68 68 91 91 99 68 68 91 91 91 91<br />

CTAF 95 with AFRU<br />

& CAGRO 54 49 66 66 45 49 49 42 42 45 49 49 42 42 42 42<br />

Basic MBZ 38 33 100 100 26 100 100 100 100 26 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

MBZ with DTI 38 32 76 76 26 68 68 91 91 26 68 68 91 91 91 91<br />

MBZ with AFRU &<br />

CAGRO 27 19 66 66 12 49 49 42 42 12 49 49 42 42 42 42<br />

MBZ with AFRU,<br />

CAGRO & DTI 27 19 59 59 12 39 39 39 39 12 39 39 39 39 39 39<br />

RISK REDUCTION SERIES 2 (Percentage compared to base case = 100 ((98 is little reduction 12 is much risk reduction))<br />

Basic MBZ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

MBZ with DTI 100 97 76 76 99 68 68 91 91 99 68 68 91 91 91 91<br />

MBZ with AFRU &<br />

CAGRO 70 59 66 66 46 49 49 42 42 46 49 49 42 42 42 42<br />

MBZ with AFRU,<br />

CAGRO & DTI 70 59 59 59 46 39 39 39 39 46 39 39 39 39 39 39<br />

Table 6 – Risk Reduction Series Note Mandatory Broadcast Zone (MBZ) now known as CTAF(R)<br />

In Table 6, Risk reduction Series 1 commences with the Basic CTAF 95 set at = 100<br />

and calculates the risk reduction from various cases. For IFR(H)-VFR in VMC (HVV)<br />

for example:<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

�<br />

Basic CTAF 95 100;<br />

with DTI 99;<br />

with AFRU and CAGRO 45; and<br />

with CTAF(R) 26.<br />

Taking MBZ-CTAF(R) as the base case, note that all <strong>of</strong> the CTAF options are less<br />

safe than CTAF(R).<br />

For CTAF(R) base case:<br />

CTAF(R) 100;<br />

with DTI 99;<br />

with AFRU and CAGRO 46; and<br />

with AFRU and CAGRO and DTI 46.<br />

The DTI case applies only to IFR-IFR pairs and provides reasonable risk reductions<br />

by ensuring that IFR(L) are known to IFR(M) and IFR(H) especially in IMC<br />

AFRU & CA/GRO essentially reduce risk across the board by 50%. This would<br />

reduce the IFR(H) – VFR point on the graph to closer to tolerable than scrutiny.<br />

A more detailed examination <strong>of</strong> the ARM would be required to determine the<br />

individual contributions <strong>of</strong> AFRU and CA/GRO.<br />

The ARM also provides insights into the operation <strong>of</strong> TCAS and transponders. TCAS<br />

is a particular implementation <strong>of</strong> Airborne Collision Avoidance System (ACAS). ACAS<br />

is designed to provide a Traffic Advisory (TA) alert at 45 seconds from closest point<br />

<strong>of</strong> approach (CPA); a mandatory Resolution Advisory (RA) at 25 seconds and, if the<br />

threat persists, a reversal.<br />

Airspace Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Macquarie</strong> (YPMQ) May 2010 Version 1.0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!