Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Aeronautical Study of Port Macquarie - Civil Aviation Safety Authority
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Office <strong>of</strong> Airspace Regulation Page 40 <strong>of</strong> 69<br />
An examination <strong>of</strong> the 12 airspace/aerodrome type incidents suggests a number <strong>of</strong><br />
recurring themes, or possible contributory factors, such as:<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
�<br />
frequency congestion on the CTAF,<br />
the need for active listening on the CTAF,<br />
the need for vigilant visual look out,<br />
the need to understand the AFRU response,<br />
reliance on TCAS,<br />
inaccurate and inadequate communications by pilots.<br />
It is suggested that many <strong>of</strong> the issues above are generic in nature to operations in<br />
non-controlled airspace and the only location specific issues at PMQ are:<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> a taxiway to RWY 03/21, causing additional runway occupancy time<br />
and subsequent circuit area problems;<br />
the occasional simultaneous use <strong>of</strong> several intersecting runways (03/21 and<br />
grass 10/28); and<br />
frequency congestion on the CTAF 118.1.<br />
The incident data, and the anecdotal evidence from pilots, also suggests that the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> conflict pairs occur either in the circuit area; joining the circuit; or by<br />
aircraft over flying or in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the aerodrome. There is little evidence from the<br />
incident records to date that there is a problem occurring in the volume <strong>of</strong> airspace<br />
further out from the circuit area.<br />
7.4 Aerodrome operator records<br />
The PMQ airport operator’s internal safety records support the ATSB data as most <strong>of</strong><br />
the occurrences detailed were reported by pilots to the ATSB and an ASIR was filed.<br />
However there were three events during 2007 and 2008 listed in the operator’s<br />
records that do not seem (or require) to have a matching ASIR report:<br />
11/8/2007. Parachutists failed to comply with dropping procedures when PT<br />
aircraft movements in progress,<br />
18/6/2008. A Eurobat was on base when a turbo prop established on final<br />
requested by radio to land in front. The turbo prop performed a missed<br />
approach passing over the top <strong>of</strong> the Eurobat on the runway,<br />
26/8/2008. Go around. A Metro called 20 NM final for a straight in approach.<br />
A Cessna 150 made a short approach in front <strong>of</strong> the Metro and occupied the<br />
runway (causing a go-around).<br />
Airspace Review <strong>of</strong> <strong>Port</strong> <strong>Macquarie</strong> (YPMQ) May 2010 Version 1.0