October 2011 issue of Freedom's Phoenix magazine - fr33aid
October 2011 issue of Freedom's Phoenix magazine - fr33aid
October 2011 issue of Freedom's Phoenix magazine - fr33aid
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Continued from Page 8 - Health Care Freedom –<br />
Are We There Yet?<br />
If we own ourselves, and we do, then we have to<br />
own our bodies, and that means doing what so<br />
many Americans are already doing -- trying to<br />
live healthier lives, avoiding addictions, eating<br />
foods that promote health, avoiding unhealthy<br />
habits or balancing them with health-restoring<br />
habits. In this we find that the governmentpharmacological<br />
and agricultural axis is sending<br />
mixed messages. The USDA wishes to sell<br />
subsidized dairy and grain products, so it tells<br />
us we should have plenty <strong>of</strong> these. If we didn’t<br />
have a USDA to subsidize grains and dairy, to<br />
promote food purchase through various food aid<br />
programs, and to advise us as to what is “good”<br />
to eat, no doubt we’d eat better and be healthier.<br />
To suggest that the government advice on what<br />
to eat, and its subsidy <strong>of</strong> food for the poor has<br />
made us less healthy may be seen as sacrilege<br />
– until you look at the results <strong>of</strong> the Great Society<br />
programs on steroids today. Government<br />
subsidized food is fattening, and those who buy<br />
into the government recommended consumption<br />
models quickly become overweight and unhealthy.<br />
If the government printed, promoted<br />
it, or pronounced it, we should pretty much run<br />
from it.<br />
Clearly, for health freedom, we need to be separate<br />
from government in thought and deed –<br />
but we should be closely integrated with our<br />
families and communities. The understanding<br />
that we have <strong>of</strong> what works and what doesn’t<br />
in maintaining our health, and also our awareness<br />
<strong>of</strong> environmental and dietary concerns, are<br />
statistically important not in a rare headline far<br />
away, but as it impacts our own family and community.<br />
To be healthy, we ought to listen to our<br />
neighbors, and be aware<br />
<strong>of</strong> our environment. The<br />
infamous story <strong>of</strong> ground<br />
water contamination portrayed<br />
in the movie Erin<br />
Brockovich was a story<br />
that we find again and<br />
again. It tells us that our<br />
neighbors, our family and<br />
our community are the first<br />
to know <strong>of</strong> health hazards<br />
– not corporations or government.<br />
Localism and localvore movements<br />
can be educational, but for real health freedom<br />
we must be aware and connected to our neighbors<br />
in a far more fundamental way.<br />
9<br />
There are those who would argue that only government<br />
is big enough and kind enough to help<br />
us when we have a catastrophic injury, health<br />
care crisis, or need expensive care at the end <strong>of</strong><br />
life. That these conditions are rare, and should<br />
be rare, is fundamental. But government involvement<br />
– in other words, health care delivered<br />
through a forced collective – means it will<br />
be one size must fit all, and behaviors that are<br />
rewarded (but not necessarily smart, sensible,<br />
or healthy) will increase. Government interference<br />
in health care means warped and counterproductive<br />
incentives, and it means false<br />
pricing data for investors, providers, patients,<br />
the marketplace and scientific communities.<br />
It will inevitably and inherently be unfair. In<br />
the end, those who can go above, underneath,<br />
or outside the system, will do so, and those left<br />
with the government system will suffer and die<br />
prematurely. This is the problem that Hayek,<br />
Orwell and Solzhenitsyn have all described in<br />
detail. Hayek’s closing<br />
words in his popular book,<br />
The Road to Serfdom, <strong>of</strong>fers<br />
a better prescription<br />
for American health care.<br />
He writes, “The guiding<br />
principle in any attempt to<br />
create a world <strong>of</strong> free men<br />
must be this: a policy <strong>of</strong><br />
freedom for the individual<br />
is the only truly progressive<br />
policy.”<br />
We are not there yet – but keep in mind we have<br />
some rules to live by, and these rules <strong>of</strong> living<br />
will bring health for ourselves, and for millions<br />
<strong>of</strong> others: 1) We, and our children, are not and<br />
never will be involuntary servants to the state.<br />
This fact legitimizes our actions to buy, promote,<br />
and consume the foods and drinks we choose;<br />
2) We own ourselves, and this means practicing<br />
in a myriad <strong>of</strong> ways, good mental and physical<br />
health, and avoiding the slavery <strong>of</strong> both addictions<br />
and self-limiting belief systems; 3) We<br />
should recognize and remember that we live in<br />
families and communities and within a living<br />
society, not in the abstract concept <strong>of</strong> a maternal<br />
and patriarchic state, and; 4) We must embrace<br />
the only truly progressive principle, which is<br />
also a healing principle: Freedom!<br />
Make a Comment • Email Link<br />
Send Letter to Editor • Save Link<br />
9