Healthy Business Strategies - Clean Production Action
Healthy Business Strategies - Clean Production Action
Healthy Business Strategies - Clean Production Action
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
t H e P r e C A u t I o n A r y P r I n C I P l e<br />
An official part of European Union policy, the Precautionary<br />
Principle states that in order to protect the environment,<br />
a precautionary approach should be widely applied,<br />
meaning that where there are threats of serious or irreversible<br />
damage to the environment, lack of full scientific<br />
certainty should not be used as a reason for postponing<br />
cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.<br />
The precautionary principle permits a lower level<br />
of proof of harm to be used in policy-making whenever the<br />
consequences of waiting for higher levels of proof may be<br />
very costly and/or irreversible.<br />
chemical ignorance means they are also<br />
ignorant of health effects their products may<br />
have on their customers during use or<br />
afterwards when the product is disposed of.<br />
Because they do not see chemical safety as<br />
part of corporate strategy, their typical first<br />
response to fears of chemical concerns is<br />
denial and opposition. In some cases, their<br />
business strategy is to be compliant with the<br />
law. But compliance alone is unhelpful as a<br />
guide for corporate policy, given the u.S.’s<br />
inadequate chemical regulatory system.<br />
Companies that focus too narrowly on<br />
compliance, especially when their sector or<br />
products are targeted for inadequate safeguards,<br />
face the risk of becoming entangled<br />
in public relations battles and negative<br />
attacks on their brand. At their worst, these<br />
unenlightened firms attack the messenger—<br />
questioning the plausibility of the science<br />
and opposing government action to limit use<br />
and exposure to toxic chemicals, all in an<br />
effort to defend existing products and<br />
markets.<br />
Of course improving corporate chemical<br />
consciousness is not like turning on a light<br />
switch. The case study companies in this<br />
report show that real investments in research,<br />
development, testing, product<br />
development and marketing are necessary.<br />
Like any effort to change an existing product<br />
line or introduce a new product line, they<br />
dealt with the natural inertia to changing<br />
product design, chemical use and relationships<br />
with suppliers. And as our case studies<br />
show, the rewards have been meaningful—<br />
resulting in brand name enhancement, cost<br />
savings, increased market value, product/<br />
brand differentiation and employee loyalty.<br />
Where do companies at the early phases of<br />
this journey begin? What are important first<br />
steps to take? Table 5 lists recommendations<br />
from the six case study companies for increasing<br />
chemical consciousness, developing<br />
new materials and products and building<br />
partnerships in the supply chain and with<br />
trade associations and business groups.<br />
healthy business strategies for transforming the toxic chemical economy