17.10.2018 Views

Movement_158_Digital

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTERVIEW<br />

JONATHAN BARTLEY<br />

Green Party<br />

Jonathan Bartley studied at the London School of Economics and has been involved in campaigning and<br />

politics since his student days. Founder of the Christian think-tank Ekklesia and drummer in the blues-rock<br />

group The Mustangs, Johnathan is the current co-chair of the Green Party alongside Siân Berry.<br />

Firstly, can you tell us a little about yourself? How<br />

would you describe your faith journey?<br />

I grew up in quite an evangelical, charismatic Christian<br />

family, but, like a lot of people I think, I questioned the<br />

faith that I grew up with a lot. Things like Greenbelt were<br />

very important to me, and I used to go quite a lot when I<br />

was younger. I’m descended from Elizabeth Fry who was<br />

a Quaker and Prison Reformer, so that strand comes down<br />

through the family too.<br />

While I was studying at the London School of Economics I<br />

found something called Workshop, an Anabaptist course run<br />

by Noel Moules. For anyone not familiar with Anabaptism,<br />

it’s very committed to equality and social justice, and has<br />

a similar background tradition to Quakerism. Workshop<br />

opened up a whole new world to me in terms of faith. The<br />

things that I wanted to believe made sense, and it gave me<br />

a rationale to believe them. For example, I’m passionately<br />

a proponent of non-violence and Workshop enabled me to<br />

see that within my faith which was amazing.<br />

For me, joining the Green Party is very much an outworking<br />

of my faith. Of course, you don’t have to be Christian to<br />

be in the Green Party, and there are Christians in other<br />

parties too. I’ve realised that there are many different<br />

types of Christianity, and there are different value sets<br />

that people hold as Christians. It’s astonishing that you<br />

can find Christians on both sides of some debates and I<br />

find that really strange, because when I look at Christianity<br />

it’s as much about how you live, in fact more about how<br />

you live, than the doctrines that we hold dear. When we<br />

look at the early church and early Christians, and the<br />

Epistle to Diognetus in the second century, when they are<br />

asked ‘What is a Christian?’, they don’t respond with a<br />

set of beliefs and doctrines, they respond with a set of<br />

behaviours and describe themselves as following ‘the<br />

way’. In the Acts of the Apostles, after the spontaneous<br />

outpouring of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, the response is<br />

one of collectivising, pooling all they have and giving it to<br />

the poor. And so that is the faith tradition that I find myself<br />

in and following really.<br />

You’ve said before that your faith informs your<br />

politics. Do you think that there is an overlap between<br />

the message of Jesus and the aims of progressive<br />

politics?<br />

Yes I think there is. Ghandi, and I’m paraphrasing him<br />

terribly here, said that Christians would be great if they just<br />

followed what Jesus said. Martin Luther King was someone<br />

who did that in his nonviolent direct action. There is a very<br />

strong strand of nonviolent direct action in my faith that I<br />

feel a great affinity with.<br />

In 2003 I wrote a book called The Subversive Manifesto:<br />

Lifting the Lid on God’s Political Agenda, which looked at<br />

the way Jesus took part in nonviolent direct action. Look at<br />

his interplay at the Synagogue at Capernaum where he has<br />

that interaction with a demon - Ched Myers is very good<br />

on this, and he points out that Jesus is calling into question<br />

the authority of the religious and political leaders of the<br />

day, and the Gospel writers notice that he had an authority<br />

that the scribes didn’t have, so this demon manifests and<br />

belittles Jesus and tries to reclaim the authority by saying<br />

‘I know who you are Jesus of Nazareth’. And we know that<br />

it is an attempt to undermine Jesus, but Jesus regains the<br />

authority. And again when he looks closely at both sides of<br />

the coin and answers the question about taxation. There’s<br />

this very strong political strand that runs right the way<br />

though the Gospels, and you can only understand Jesus<br />

as a political figure. When he’s tempted in the desert there<br />

are three temptations to take power, and to bring about a<br />

top-down revolution, and Jesus rejects all three of them.<br />

I wrote another book, Faith and Politics After Christendom:<br />

the Church as a <strong>Movement</strong> for Anarchy, which traces the<br />

idea of Christians being passionate about social justice<br />

and living ‘the way’ being annexed by political power<br />

by Constantine in the 4th Century. The cross, which<br />

was a symbol of torture and oppression, became under<br />

Constantine a symbol of conquest and righteousness.<br />

And now 1700 years later Christianity takes its place as<br />

an oppressive force within western Europe, and actually<br />

persecutes Christians who don’t see things in the same<br />

way as the church.<br />

12 MOVEMENT Issue <strong>158</strong> MOVEMENT Issue <strong>158</strong><br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!