12.12.2018 Views

South African Psychiatry - November 2018

South African Psychiatry - November 2018

South African Psychiatry - November 2018

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REPORT<br />

The psychoanalytical approach to the memorial<br />

ceremony and conference invited attendees to<br />

embark on the momentous psychic journey to<br />

salvage psychic life from the devastating debris of<br />

the decanting. The red thread of psychoanalysis<br />

wove itself through the LE team’s initial interviews with<br />

the affected families; the preparation, presentation,<br />

and cross examination of the LE team’s expert<br />

testimony report during the ADR (a ground-breaking<br />

forensic application for psychoanalysis in <strong>South</strong><br />

Africa); and the culminating memorial ceremony<br />

and conference. Where persistent and repeated<br />

legal questioning of conscious motives and<br />

knowledge was unable to provide clarity, the 2017<br />

psychoanalytical testimony at the ADR and this<br />

year’s dialogue at the Deadly Medicine Conference<br />

offered tentative explanations for the emergence of<br />

this tragedy. By engaging with deeper, unconscious<br />

motives and driving forces within individuals and<br />

society, aspects of the LE decanting have started to<br />

be metabolised and rendered less ineffable and at<br />

least partially comprehensible.<br />

The keynote address at the conference was delivered<br />

by Professor Leslie Swartz, who initiated a critical<br />

dialogue around the disenfranchised locus of the<br />

disabled and of mental healthcare users in our<br />

society, and the fraught politics of identity in relation<br />

to our psychoanalytic work. He also highlighted how,<br />

as in the LE Decanting, death makes neglect visible,<br />

but that “the Esidimeni tragedy is … not unique in its<br />

betrayal and neglect of disabled people”. 6 Swartz’s<br />

emphasis on LE not being an isolated event was<br />

reiterated throughout the conference: abundant<br />

examples were named of the abject disintegration<br />

or absence of physical resources and of systemic<br />

deficits to tolerate and symbolise unbearable<br />

horror. The LE disaster is, unnervingly, simply one<br />

instantiation of a far more pervasive and insidious<br />

disregard for human life and dignity; simply one of<br />

many – admittedly less public – concrete expressions<br />

of the organisational and societal dysfunction within<br />

the Gauteng Health Department and broader state<br />

and societal structures.<br />

THE PANEL PRESENTATIONS AND PAPERS<br />

WHICH FOLLOWED SWARTZ’S KEYNOTE<br />

ADDRESS EXTENDED DISCUSSION OF THE<br />

ESSENTIAL PROCESS OF CONTAINING<br />

AND SYMBOLISING SUFFERING; THE<br />

ROLE OF COUNTERTRANSFERENCE<br />

IN RELATION TO TRAUMA; AND THE<br />

DECONSTRUCTION OF THE PERVERSE,<br />

PSYCHOTIC, AND ANARCHIC STATE OF<br />

MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES IN GAUTENG<br />

AND SOUTH AFRICA AS A WHOLE.<br />

Van der Walt’s paper, which critically examined and<br />

contrasted the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s<br />

(TRC) approach to achieving reparation and redress<br />

with that of the ADR, also serendipitously provided an<br />

additional perspective on Primo Levi’s suicide. Whilst<br />

the TRC’s unofficial preoccupation appeared to be<br />

omnipotent healing and forgiveness – possibly at<br />

the cost of acknowledging the unbearable truth<br />

of boundless and unbound suffering and rage –<br />

the ADR process seemed to be less susceptible to<br />

the compelling urge to retreat from “the raw and<br />

destabilizing power of trauma”. 7 As a result, the ADR<br />

could introduce into an official record a “metabolized<br />

version of trauma narrative” 7 , a potential starting<br />

point for confronting the emotional – and not<br />

simply cognitive – truth of unthinkable human<br />

suffering. This then in turn introduces the hope of<br />

safeguarding the psychic life of individuals and<br />

social structures in the aftermath of trauma – unlike<br />

for Primo Levi whose conscious ‘reason’ afforded<br />

others a rich understanding of the Holocaust, but<br />

whose unbound residues of horror never achieved<br />

representation and expression, thus ultimately killing<br />

him.<br />

In 1958, Primo Levi initially wrote that “if there is<br />

one thing sure in this world, it is certainly this: that<br />

it will not happen to us a second time”. This may<br />

well be the desired rhetoric in the aftermath of the<br />

LE tragedy (and perhaps may have also been the<br />

Upon request of the families of the victims of the Marathon Project, memorial ceremony attendees dressed in black and affixed differently coloured flowers to their<br />

clothing. Family members of the deceased wore red flowers; family members of the survivors, white flowers; and other attendees, yellow flowers. From left to right:<br />

memorial ceremony attendee Bokang Mpeta; poet and conference presenter Makhosazana Xaba; and member of the LE clinical team and conference presenter<br />

Zamakhanya Makhanya. (Photographer for “Flowers for Memorial”: Louise Gubb; Photographer for “Flowers”: Michael Benn)<br />

32 * SOUTH AFRICAN PSYCHIATRY ISSUE 17 <strong>2018</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!