12.12.2018 Views

South African Psychiatry - November 2018

South African Psychiatry - November 2018

South African Psychiatry - November 2018

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CULINARY CORNER<br />

RESEARCH AS A SOCIAL PROCESS<br />

P-hackers and other statistical cheats are not the<br />

only people hampering the development of science.<br />

Another problem relates to the social context in<br />

which research finds are disseminated.<br />

REFRESHER<br />

AUTISTIC FEMALES ARE DIFFERENT<br />

TO AUTISTIC MALES<br />

Daniel Kahneman, the author of the well-received<br />

book “Thinking Fast and Slow” (2011), argued that<br />

the concept of loss aversion was the most significant<br />

contribution to the psychology of behavioural<br />

economics. Not so, argues David Gal (<strong>2018</strong>), a<br />

professor of marketing at the University of Illinois<br />

at Chicago. He, together with Derek Rucker of<br />

Northwestern University carried out a critical review<br />

of loss aversion and concluded that there is, in fact,<br />

no global loss aversion bias.<br />

Contexts in which people are motivated by a fear of<br />

loss are associated with rational thought processes,<br />

as are contexts where people are not motivated by<br />

a fear of loss. These incidents are associated with<br />

specific explanations rather than with an inborn<br />

cognitive tendency.<br />

FOR EXAMPLE, MESSAGES THAT FRAME<br />

AN APPEAL IN TERMS OF LOSS ARE NO<br />

MORE PERSUASIVE THAN MESSAGES THAT<br />

FRAME AN APPEAL IN TERMS OF GAIN.<br />

In his essay, “Why the Most Important Idea in<br />

Behavioural Decision Making is a Fallacy” Gal<br />

(<strong>2018</strong>) goes on explain why a belief in loss aversion<br />

has persisted so strongly. He notes that science is a<br />

social process in which advocates of a theory need<br />

to convince other scientists by means of logic and<br />

argument that the evidence is best explained by<br />

that particular theory.<br />

ONCE MANY PEOPLE ARE CONVINCED,<br />

THE INCUMBENT THEORY IS<br />

ADVANTAGED OVER CHALLENGES TO<br />

IT. GAL (<strong>2018</strong>) POINTS OUT THAT THE<br />

STATUS QUO IS MAINTAINED THROUGH<br />

CONFIRMATION BIAS, SOCIAL PROOF,<br />

IDEOLOGICAL COMPLACENCY, AND THE<br />

VESTED INTERESTS OF SCIENTISTS WHOSE<br />

REPUTATIONS ARE CONNECTED TO<br />

EXISTING THEORIES. IN THE CASE OF LOSS<br />

AVERSION, CONTRADICTORY EVIDENCE<br />

HAD BEEN IGNORED, DISMISSED<br />

OR EXPLAINED AWAY. FURTHERMORE,<br />

AMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE HAD TENDED TO<br />

BE INTERPRETED AS CONFIRMING LOSS<br />

AVERSION.<br />

Gal (<strong>2018</strong>) concludes that one should be neither<br />

too accepting in relation to institutional consensus of<br />

theories nor too wary of criticising accepted beliefs.<br />

Of late there has been much criticising of accepted<br />

beliefs in autism studies. The challenged wisdom has<br />

been that autism is found in boys more than girls<br />

and that when it is found in girls it is very severe.<br />

However it is emerging that many females who are<br />

less extremely based on the spectrum are often<br />

not diagnosed because they present differently<br />

(Szalavitz, 2016). Behavioural and neuroimaging<br />

studies suggest that females with autism are closer<br />

to developing males in their social abilities than<br />

typical girls or boys with autism.<br />

Autistic girls show more of a desire to connect, they<br />

exhibit less repetitive behaviour than boys, their<br />

preferences and pastimes are more similar to other<br />

girls and, unlike their male counterparts, they may<br />

indulge in pretence play. Their tendency towards<br />

rigidity, focus on detail and distress with change<br />

may lead them to be misdiagnosed as suffering<br />

from obsessive compulsive disorder, attention deficit<br />

disorder or anorexia nervosa (Szalavitz, 2016).<br />

AUTISM AND ANOREXIA NERVOSA<br />

Individuals with anorexia nervosa and those<br />

with an autism spectrum condition both exhibit<br />

perfectionism, a preference for symmetry and<br />

exactness, obsessiveness, impaired social cognition<br />

and social skills. Preliminary studies have suggested<br />

that in both disorders there is decreased neural<br />

activity in the superior temporal cortex and temperoparietal<br />

junction (involved with social cognition and<br />

social skills), as well as a decrease in grey matter in<br />

the temporal lobes (Bjornsdotter et al, <strong>2018</strong>).<br />

Bjornsdotter et al (<strong>2018</strong>) investigated whether there<br />

was less grey matter in areas associated with a<br />

theory of mind in anorexic girls aged 16 to 25 who<br />

presented also with autistic traits. It emerged that<br />

elevated autistic traits in young women with anorexia<br />

nervosa were indeed associated with morphometric<br />

alterations of brain areas linked to social cognition.<br />

SOUTH AFRICAN PSYCHIATRY ISSUE 17 <strong>2018</strong> * 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!