12.27.18
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PW OPINION PW NEWS PW LIFE PW ARTS<br />
•GUEST OPINION•<br />
BY WILLIAM PAPARIAN<br />
SEEING IS<br />
BELIEVING<br />
WHEN IT COMES TO POLICE MISCONDUCT IN PASADENA,<br />
WHO ARE YOU GOING TO BELIEVE?<br />
Do some civic-minded math and you’ll find that in Pasadena it is rare when two and<br />
two actually adds up to four.<br />
Take last year’s brutal police beating of motorist Christopher Ballew for<br />
example. A report by an outside expert hired by the Pasadena City Attorney determined<br />
that the two officers who beat the young man in a gas station parking lot at this time last<br />
year did so with “reasonable force.”<br />
Watch the video and you will be reminded of the joke about the abusive and cheating<br />
husband who is confronted by his wife after she finds lipstick on his collar. When she<br />
presses him as to how it got there, and asks if he’s having an affair, the husband denies it.<br />
Instead he asks, “Who are you going to believe? Me, or your lying eyes?”<br />
So now we have a report.<br />
The report to City Attorney Michele Beal Bagneris comes from Robert Fonzi, a former<br />
San Bernardino County undersheriff and use-of-force expert retained by the city. It will<br />
make up part of the city’s defense in federal court, where city officials including Mayor<br />
Terry Tornek, the two officers (identified as Zachary Lujan and Lerry Esparza) and former<br />
Chief Phillip Sanchez are defendants.<br />
The National Police Foundation (NPF), an organization whose board is chaired<br />
by former Pasadena Police Chief Bernard Melekian, was recently hired by the city to<br />
investigate the incident.<br />
Clearly the city has no incentive to discipline these officers if Bagneris is defending<br />
them in court. That would be counter-productive.<br />
During my 12 years of service as a Pasadena elected public official and in the years<br />
since, I was well known as a strong advocate for public safety. My history with the<br />
Pasadena Police Department goes back almost 40 years to the early 1980s. When Don<br />
McIntyre was city manager I served on the Crime Advisory Committee and I was on the<br />
Police Chief Selection Advisory Committee when Jim Robison was appointed police chief.<br />
I was on the bond committee that helped secure the funding for our new police<br />
headquarters building. During a time of budgetary restraints I pushed hard for full<br />
staffing of our Police Department and for salaries in the upper 25 percent of comparable<br />
jurisdictions.<br />
And over the objection of my constituents who were concerned about the noise from<br />
gunfire, I made sure that the Eaton Canyon shooting range was kept open so that our<br />
police officers could maintain the highest standards in lethal force training under the<br />
watchful eye of range master Jack Preston. We even secured federal funding to install a<br />
sound baffling system to mitigate the sound of gunfire.<br />
As a city councilman and mayor of Pasadena, I established the Public Safety<br />
Committee, was its first chairperson, and advocated for civilian oversight of the Police<br />
Department.<br />
There was a time when our Police Department was a model for other departments<br />
to follow. During Robison’s tenure new police officers were subjected to an intense<br />
psychological evaluation to ensure that only mature and well-balanced recruits earned<br />
the badge of a police officer for our city. Sadly, our Police Department is no longer a<br />
shining example for others. The recent scandals that have befallen our Police Department<br />
have taken a toll on its once stellar reputation. The former police chief’s adjutant will be<br />
sentenced next month in federal court for illicit trafficking in firearms, and the police chief<br />
himself was forced to resign when it was revealed by this newspaper that he was aware of<br />
the illegal gun sales and did nothing to stop it.<br />
The situation with the Ballew case is the best example of why civic involvement and<br />
oversight is so important. Otherwise, two and two will always be whatever the city<br />
wants you to believe it is. The bottom line is that the city has a conflict of interest when it<br />
represents the interests of Officers Esparza and Lujan and not the interests of those like<br />
Mr. Ballew.<br />
No reasonable person who has seen the video can walk away with the conclusion that<br />
Ballew’s beating was justified. But who are you going to believe? The city, or your lying<br />
eyes? ■<br />
Attorney William Paparian is a former mayor of Pasadena<br />
8 PASADENA WEEKLY | <strong>12.27.18</strong>