26.03.2019 Views

CR5 Issue167 April 2019

A local community magazine delivered free to 11,700 homes every month in the CR5 postcode. Contains local business advertising,interesting reads, Competitions, What's on in the Community and puzzles.

A local community magazine delivered free to 11,700 homes every month in the CR5 postcode.
Contains local business advertising,interesting reads, Competitions, What's on in the Community and puzzles.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Price of Free Speech<br />

We live in divided times. Everyone seems to<br />

have an opinion, and wants to share it. Now<br />

that’s fine as far as it goes but when holding and<br />

stating a contrary opinion earns you not just<br />

an acknowledgement of a disagreement but<br />

threats and abuse, something’s gone<br />

horribly wrong.<br />

Now it’s easy to put the blame on<br />

social media. Facebook and their peers may<br />

have started out as a way of friends to exchange<br />

holiday photos and contact distant relatives<br />

without the bother of writing a letter or the<br />

expense of a phone call but have turned some<br />

people into serial arguers, a gaggle of folk who<br />

pick a verbal fight at the slightest excuse.<br />

Some have found a degree of solace, and have<br />

managed to surround themselves with a cadre<br />

of like/small-minded posters for whom there’s<br />

no way but their way, the system/world is<br />

against them and for which factual evidence<br />

and logical argument hold no sway.<br />

But the mainstream media is no less to blame.<br />

When my wife was at school, which was a<br />

little while back, a teacher asked her class to<br />

go through a selection of newspapers across<br />

the spectrum and highlight any facts that were<br />

to be found. Even then, they were few and far<br />

between. Spin, opinion and frankly out-right lies<br />

were far more prevalent. It hasn’t changed.<br />

I suspect, though I cannot prove the point<br />

without considerably more research, that the<br />

position has worsened.<br />

Newspapers are desperate to shift<br />

copies, never more than now when all the<br />

traditional channels are under pressure from<br />

online services and diminishing advertising<br />

revenues. A fact is a fact and if reported at face<br />

value there’d be no differentiation.<br />

What is needed is an angle, a way of marketing<br />

the fact to make your version more appealing<br />

to the audience. Trouble is that the marketing<br />

has overtaken the fact. Often the actual truth<br />

of the matter isn’t just a detail, it actually gets<br />

in the way of what the paper wants to say. And<br />

television is as prone to this. Radio too.<br />

In the race for higher and higher<br />

readership/viewing figures, sensation wins over<br />

sense. It’s hardly surprising that we have an<br />

entire generation of politicians for whom being<br />

flexible with the truth has moved from being<br />

an occasional necessary evil to standard<br />

operational procedure. There is a movement<br />

to hold politicians to account. That when they<br />

stand and make a promise or statement that is<br />

untrue, they’re penalised. It has yet to gain any<br />

real traction but surely it ought to be law? If a<br />

businessman lies about the profitability of his<br />

company he can go to jail. But the leading<br />

politicians of the day can claim that black is<br />

white, that a massive cut in funding represents<br />

record spending, anything that makes their<br />

position look good, without ever being held to<br />

account.<br />

And that’s what it comes down to. The lack of<br />

responsibility. Someone mouths off in the pub,<br />

gets abusive, bullying, they risk getting into an<br />

argument, possibly even decked. But online,<br />

they’re ‘wrapped in cotton wool’ safe.<br />

The newspapers have in recent times<br />

accused high court judges of being ‘enemies<br />

of the people’ for upholding the law and the<br />

Justice Secretary barely raised an eyebrow.<br />

They’ve run story after story, flawed and untrue,<br />

that have demonized every believer of Islam as<br />

being somehow a terrorist set on the downfall of<br />

Western civilisation (by which they mean white,<br />

Anglo-Saxon civilisation). And nothing. Not a slap<br />

on the wrist even.<br />

Now a maniac, fuelled on media lies, walks into a<br />

New Zealand mosque and kills 49 unarmed men,<br />

women and children.<br />

One of our new neighbours, in the course of a<br />

conversation, waited until she was just with my<br />

wife before very cautiously letting her know she<br />

was a Muslim. She was scared of our reaction.<br />

And this was before this latest outrage. Is this<br />

what we’ve come to?<br />

From the government, to the media, to every<br />

individual. We must be held responsible for our<br />

actions, our words and deeds. So that if there’s a<br />

doubt, we pause. If what we say, what we do will<br />

cause innocents harm, we stop. And if we don’t<br />

we should be held accountable.<br />

Free speech has a price.<br />

Paul M Ford<br />

Graydorian – The Writing Bureau<br />

8 Log into www.cr5.co.uk your local community website!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!