09.04.2019 Views

DCN April 2019 Edition

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WORKPLACE LAW<br />

Labor’s election platform and<br />

plans for the Fair Work Act<br />

A change of government at the next federal election is likely to result in considerable<br />

changes to the industrial relations landscape, writes Chris Gianatti<br />

IF SUCCESSFUL AT THE NEXT<br />

federal election, the Australian Labor Party<br />

has proposed several changes to the Fair<br />

Work Act (refer to boxed out section). If the<br />

proposals successfully pass the Senate, this<br />

will change the industrial relations landscape<br />

dramatically, back to a pre-1993 era.<br />

Taken in combination, these proposals<br />

would significantly re-regulate the<br />

workplace in a way that will, I argue,<br />

entirely defeat any capacity to compete on<br />

the basis of cost arising from anything to<br />

do with labour.<br />

Modern award conditions and minimum<br />

wages rates apply to all participants in an<br />

industry. To have an enterprise agreement,<br />

then the agreement must provide that all<br />

employees are better off compared to the<br />

Award. If you wish to resist pay rises under<br />

enterprise agreements, protected action<br />

will be simpler to obtain by employees to<br />

compel you to give a pay rise or improved<br />

conditions.<br />

Once an agreement is made, then it will<br />

never be allowed to go backwards and will<br />

always be just the new base platform for<br />

further increases. If you don’t agree to an<br />

“agreement”, the Fair Work Commission<br />

will have more power to arbitrate the<br />

agreement for you. If you wish to start<br />

a new enterprise and go directly to new<br />

employees for a new enterprise agreement,<br />

this will be seen as a “sham” and you will<br />

have to go to a union to get a “greenfields”<br />

agreement. If you wish to outsource or get<br />

labour hire, then transfer of business rules<br />

Chris Gianatti, director, KHQ Lawyers<br />

THE ALP’S KEY PROPOSALS<br />

NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT<br />

STANDARDS<br />

• A new definition of “casual”<br />

employment to ensure that casual<br />

work is strictly unpredictable and<br />

intermittent only.<br />

• Standardisation of long service leave<br />

entitlements.<br />

• A ban on pay confidentiality clauses<br />

in employees’ contracts.<br />

MODERN AWARDS/ANNUAL<br />

WAGE REVIEW<br />

• Restoration of, and protection<br />

against, further changes to penalty<br />

rates.<br />

• A greater emphasis on the needs<br />

of the low paid in the setting of<br />

minimum wages. (NB: A formal “living<br />

wage” policy has not been set out,<br />

but the ALP has made some noises in<br />

that direction).<br />

ENTERPRISE AGREEMENTS<br />

• Strengthened requirements for good<br />

faith bargaining.<br />

• Industry-level bargaining to be<br />

permitted in at least low-paid sectors.<br />

• A prohibition on employees going<br />

backwards via the termination of<br />

enterprise agreements.<br />

• A ban on “sham” agreements – eg.<br />

agreements made with three or four<br />

employees.<br />

INDUSTRIAL ACTION<br />

• Simplification of the procedural<br />

requirements to take protected<br />

industrial action.<br />

• Query whether the Fair Work<br />

Commission will be given new<br />

discretion(s) as to whether<br />

unprotected action should be<br />

ordered to stop and/or whether an<br />

employer can sue a union in tort for<br />

causing unprotected action.<br />

OTHER<br />

• Abolition of the Australian Building<br />

and Construction Commission and<br />

repeal of the Building Code 2016.<br />

• Likely restoration of the Road Safety<br />

Tribunal.<br />

• Strengthened provisions against<br />

sham contracting.<br />

• Greater powers for the Fair Work<br />

Commission to be able to arbitrate<br />

(rather than just conciliate) disputes.<br />

will ensure that your enterprise agreement<br />

goes across to the outsourced provider. The<br />

outsourced provider will also need to be<br />

licensed and forever be at the mercy of the<br />

licensing body. If you try to go offshore, you<br />

will have to satisfy the government that<br />

you have done local labour market testing<br />

first. If you try to close the doors, this<br />

could be a breach of general protections for<br />

taking adverse action against the employees<br />

because they were simply exercising their<br />

workplace right to be in a union and<br />

seek pay rises. A court can then issue an<br />

injunction against your business to prevent<br />

it terminating the employment of any<br />

employees.<br />

WAIT AND SEE<br />

Until we know the timing and outcome of<br />

election, it certainly pays to review your<br />

enterprise agreement portfolio. Continue<br />

to review your arrangements with your<br />

casual employees in light of “Skene’s<br />

Case” last year and the further expected<br />

changes from the ALP. Also stay close to<br />

your employees with the things that are<br />

important to them.<br />

58 <strong>April</strong> <strong>2019</strong><br />

thedcn.com.au

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!