You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FINANCIAL VANGUARD<br />
5 reasons Nigeria will remain<br />
poverty capital until 2023<br />
….with leadership and a sense of purpose, we can lift 100<br />
million Nigerians out of poverty in ten years — President<br />
Buhari, June 12, 2019 in Abuja<br />
POSSIBLY, several of the card<br />
carrying members of the All<br />
Progressives Congress, APC,<br />
present clapped lustily when the<br />
President made that statement.<br />
That is to be expected. Loyal<br />
politicians at campaign rallies are<br />
not expected to think critically<br />
about what their leaders say. Their<br />
role is to applaud anything<br />
pronounced. Other observers still<br />
in possession of their thinking caps<br />
could easily determine that the<br />
statement was totally empty for<br />
several reasons. Five reasons will<br />
be sufficient to illustrate the point.<br />
First, Buhari said “with<br />
leadership”, not “with my<br />
leadership”. It might appear like<br />
quibbling with semantics, but,<br />
other leaders embarking their<br />
nations on a new and prosperous<br />
direction have always emphasised<br />
their contributions to the<br />
achievements envisaged.<br />
Second, at close to 78, and only<br />
four years to go, all being well,<br />
Buhari is speculating on an<br />
objective well beyond his tenure.<br />
Even if he regards himself as the<br />
leader with a sense of purpose, he<br />
will not be around for sixty percent<br />
of the ten years to pilot the ship of<br />
the Nigerian State.<br />
Third, it is safe to assume that<br />
the ten years have not commenced<br />
now in 2019. With the Gross<br />
Domestic Product, GDP, in the first<br />
quarter, Q1, of 2019, growing at a<br />
miserable under 2 per cent and less<br />
than Q4 of 2018, Nigeria has<br />
added more people to those living<br />
in poverty instead of lifting them<br />
out of it. From all appearances,<br />
2019 is certainly not the first year<br />
of the ten.<br />
Fourth, Nigeria, under APC<br />
government, is again repeating all<br />
the mistakes which make it<br />
unlikely that we will ever achieve<br />
the remarkable economic<br />
transformations which enabled<br />
China, India and Indonesia, the<br />
three countries mentioned in the<br />
June 12 address to escape mass<br />
poverty.<br />
The Nigerian president was<br />
declared winner in February this<br />
year. India’s prime minister was<br />
re-elected more than two months<br />
after that. The Indian prime<br />
minister announced his cabinet 72<br />
hours after the results of the<br />
election. Nigeria still has no<br />
ministers. The difference is clear<br />
between a purposeful prime<br />
minister, leader and his Nigerian<br />
counterpart.<br />
By the time you read this article,<br />
June will almost be over. The first<br />
half of 2019 will soon be gone.<br />
Purposeful leaders recognise time<br />
as an economic resource almost<br />
at par with capital, labour and<br />
infrastructure. They never waste<br />
time or encourage their<br />
subordinates to do the same.<br />
Ministers appointed after June<br />
will spend the rest of the year<br />
coming to grips with their scope<br />
of responsibilities. Nothing much<br />
can be expected of them. Ministers<br />
who attempt to “hit the ground<br />
running” – to use the hackneyed<br />
expression of journalists –<br />
invariably lead their Ministries<br />
into blind alleys. An example was<br />
the former Minister of<br />
Transportation, Mr Rotimi<br />
Amaechi, who made grand<br />
promises about the Lagos-Ibadan<br />
and the Lagos-Calabar rail lines<br />
in 2016. The first should have been<br />
in operation now according to<br />
him. Not only is there no rail<br />
commuter service between Lagos<br />
and Ibadan, international experts<br />
are now telling us that the<br />
Nigerian rail line costs have been<br />
grossly padded. Time lost; money<br />
lost.<br />
The Nigerian president made no<br />
FINANCIAL VANGUARD<br />
personal commitment to achieve<br />
the objective stated. It was more of<br />
an academic exercise. By contrast,<br />
when President John Kennedy of<br />
America, after the Russians sent an<br />
astronaut into space announced<br />
that “by the end of the decade<br />
America will send a man to the<br />
moon and bring him back” he had<br />
provided a timeline for the<br />
objective. America was challenged<br />
to reach the moon by December<br />
1969. Even though Kennedy was<br />
assassinated in 1963, the USA<br />
achieved the goal ahead of time.<br />
Two purposeful Presidents after<br />
Kennedy - Johnson and Nixon -<br />
made sure that happened. But,<br />
Kennedy got the ball rolling by<br />
establishing the framework for<br />
success. He got the brightest and<br />
best Americans to work on the<br />
project. By contrast Buhari has not<br />
No purposeful leader<br />
would allow the<br />
security situation to<br />
deteriorate under him<br />
and allow truckers to<br />
openly defy his orders<br />
and close the nation’s<br />
ports for three years<br />
established the Economic<br />
Management Team which will<br />
make it possible for Nigeria to lift<br />
100 million out of poverty in ten<br />
years. That explains the difference<br />
between purposeful leadership<br />
and wishful thinkers.<br />
Fifth, if a purposeful leader can<br />
be defined as one who does not<br />
ignore clear threats to the<br />
economy and security of his<br />
nation, then Buhari has failed on,<br />
at least, two instances. China, India<br />
and Indonesia would not have<br />
allowed trucks to block the road<br />
Performance ,not recapitalization determines survival of<br />
a bank – MD Imowo MfB<br />
The Managing Director, Imowo Microfinance Bank, MfB, Ijebu Ode,<br />
Ogun State, Mr. Ajayi Abiodun, in this interview, said that the survival<br />
of a bank is largely determined by its financial performance which<br />
requires good management and corporate governance, rather than<br />
capital base. He also highlighted other issues affecting the sub sector<br />
and its operations.<br />
Excerpts<br />
By Providence Emmanuel<br />
DO you think the MfBs really<br />
need recapitalization as<br />
required by the CBN?<br />
I can say categorically that it is<br />
not recapitalisation that matter,<br />
what matters is the performance of<br />
each bank, aside that, they should<br />
allow banks to grow organically, not<br />
by forcing them to recapitalize.<br />
Some banks are in the rural area,<br />
they don’t need more than N20<br />
million to perform. It is those banks<br />
that their capital has been eroded<br />
through bad debt that want the<br />
Central Bank of Nigeria, CBN to<br />
enforce recapitalisation. Some Unit<br />
MfBs do not have N50 million<br />
required by the CBN. Even the<br />
capital they have, they are yet to<br />
utilize it through lending to the<br />
active poor in the rural area because<br />
they do not give loans beyond N20,<br />
000 or N30, 000. If they are forced<br />
to recapitalize with N50 million and<br />
they manage to, who will take it from<br />
them? Some commercial banks that<br />
recapitalized with N25 billion, they<br />
have been distressed. Even if they<br />
raise their money to N100 billion<br />
instead of N25 billion, they will die<br />
if the management and corporate<br />
governance is not existing. It is not<br />
recapitalization that matters; it is<br />
the performance of each bank. They<br />
should allow them to grow<br />
organically. When I came to my<br />
bank, our total share capital was<br />
below N5 million, but today, the total<br />
share capital is over N170 million.<br />
When the CBN first came with<br />
•Ajayi Abiodun<br />
recapitalization of Unit MfBs, they<br />
raised it to N200 million, assuming<br />
we were unable to raise such and<br />
they collapse our bank, it is going to<br />
have a negative effect on the<br />
populace. What matters is the<br />
performance of each bank.<br />
How is your bank impacting the<br />
lives of people in Ogun state?<br />
That is very good; the most<br />
important aspect of how we have<br />
been helping them is by giving them<br />
micro loan. Some of the civil<br />
servants have small businesses they<br />
Vanguard, MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2019 — 29<br />
to their major ports for three weeks<br />
because their leaders are aware of<br />
the undesirable consequences.<br />
Nigeria allowed its major ports to<br />
be blockaded for over three years<br />
without government action. Even<br />
today we are witnessing an<br />
impotent government which<br />
issued a 72 hour quit notice to the<br />
criminal road blockers and three<br />
weeks after, they are still there. It<br />
would never happen in China.<br />
Similarly, when herdsmen<br />
terrorist first started to imperil the<br />
security of the nation, the Federal<br />
Government of Nigeria could not<br />
foresee the danger to our food<br />
security. First, the problem was<br />
ignored. Herdsmen killed about<br />
300 citizens in Agatu, Benue State,<br />
the nation’s main food production<br />
belt, and the President of Nigeria<br />
did not even visit the place nor send<br />
relief materials. Then, excuses<br />
followed. In a shameless<br />
demonstration of blaming the<br />
victims, the government<br />
announced that herdsmen were<br />
provoked when Benue State<br />
passed a no grazing law. Yet, the<br />
pogrom at Agatu occurred over<br />
one year before the law was<br />
passed.<br />
Then the herdsmen went to<br />
Plateau State which had no law<br />
prohibiting grazing. Soon a<br />
government spokesman<br />
announced to fellow Nigerians<br />
that we have two options: our land<br />
or our lives.<br />
In all these, the short-sighted<br />
leaders in Abuja acted as if they<br />
actually expected to promote one<br />
lawless group without instigating<br />
reprisals. Cattle rustlers soon<br />
emerged and they too were<br />
ignored. Then bandits and<br />
kidnappers increasingly took over<br />
Zamfara and Katsina States. They<br />
too were ignored because our<br />
leaders had an election to face. All<br />
those threats to lives and properties<br />
could wait while they went after<br />
the precious second term.<br />
Second term has now been<br />
do after work, so we give them soft<br />
loan to boost their business. Some<br />
need money to buy car, fridge, among<br />
<strong>others</strong>. We buy for them and when<br />
their salary comes, we take our<br />
money from deductions. It could be<br />
from a period of six months to one<br />
year.<br />
Aside from that, some get<br />
developmental loan to raise their<br />
personal building, we give them<br />
money when they want to start<br />
foundation, after that we give them<br />
again to raise the building. We can’t<br />
give them N15 million at a go, it is<br />
called developmental loan; we give<br />
them as they develop their building<br />
gradually. Some take about six years<br />
to complete but we can’t give them<br />
loan for more than one year. After<br />
paying for one year, then they can<br />
apply for another one.<br />
The salaries of civil servants in<br />
Ogun state comes regularly, unlike<br />
other states where they owe six<br />
months, but in Ogun state, we don’t<br />
have problem giving loan to civil<br />
servants because we deduct from<br />
their monthly salary. But for the<br />
market women, we devise means of<br />
monitoring and securing their<br />
loans, we tell them to produce two<br />
civil servants that can guarantee<br />
secured. But, on June 12, while the<br />
President of Nigeria was<br />
announcing that Nigeria could lift<br />
100 million people out of poverty<br />
in ten years, bandits again invaded<br />
his state and carried off a village<br />
head. The terrorists now control<br />
more of Zamfara and Katsina<br />
States than the Federal<br />
Government and the State<br />
governments do.<br />
On June 18, 2019, the Chief of<br />
Army Staff, CoAS, General Tukur<br />
Buratai, who a few days before had<br />
boasted that Boko Haram was<br />
finished, had to eat his words after<br />
the insurgents attacked several<br />
army bases killing unknown<br />
numbers of soldiers. According to<br />
the CoAS, “It is unfortunate, but<br />
the truth is that almost every<br />
setback the Nigerian army has had<br />
in our operations in recent times<br />
can be traced to insufficient<br />
commitment to a common<br />
national and military course by<br />
those at the frontlines.” Buratai<br />
was being economical with the<br />
truth. He should simply have said<br />
“Fellow Nigerians, please say your<br />
last prayers.” He has just<br />
announced that the Nigerian army<br />
is ill-prepared to fight and win this<br />
war.<br />
Meanwhile, we must bear in<br />
mind that we have a retired Major<br />
General as President and he was<br />
elected and re-elected because<br />
Nigerians thought that he could<br />
provide security for rapid<br />
economic growth to occur. At the<br />
start of his fifth year in office,<br />
Nigeria is now more insecure than<br />
in 2015. Even his state – Katsina<br />
— is now under siege unlike 2015.<br />
Obviously, no purposeful leader<br />
would allow the security situation<br />
to deteriorate under him and allow<br />
truckers to openly defy his orders<br />
and close the nation’s ports for<br />
three years. We cannot be like<br />
China, India and Indonesia<br />
because we don’t have a leader like<br />
theirs.<br />
MICROFINANCE<br />
them on their salary and that I can<br />
tell you, is working very well, when<br />
they allow civil servants to give them<br />
cheque as collateral, the civil<br />
servant would also monitor the<br />
facility being granted, since they<br />
secured it with their cheque. They<br />
know the implication of issuing dud<br />
cheque. We don’t take collateral<br />
from federal because we don’t have<br />
power over that. We always carry<br />
out proper assessment of the<br />
customer to ensure they have the<br />
capacity to pay back the money.<br />
Those who do not have capacity to<br />
pay back, we don’t give them much<br />
money and that is what we call active<br />
poor.<br />
Are you in support of the inhuman<br />
methods use by some MfBs to<br />
recover loan from defaulters?<br />
Some banks are practicing it, it is<br />
too bad, that is what they call “Gbo<br />
omu le lantern” (breast on<br />
lantern). I have heard it but I have<br />
never seen it. There is nothing wrong<br />
with using subtle pressure to recover<br />
loan, (empty threat) but it is unfair<br />
to lock up customers shop or apply<br />
some inhuman treatment on a<br />
customer without any court<br />
judgment. The subtle pressure does<br />
work some times if it is applied.