31.08.2019 Views

NZPhotographer Issue 23, September 2019

As of December 2022, NZPhotographer magazine is only available when you purchase an annual or monthly subscription via the NZP website. Find out more: www.nzphotographer.nz

As of December 2022, NZPhotographer magazine is only available when you purchase an annual or monthly subscription via the NZP website. Find out more: www.nzphotographer.nz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXPOSURE<br />

This has to be in accordance with the message of the<br />

photo; it should compliment your imagination and<br />

intention for the shoot. Ask yourself Did I adopt the best<br />

exposure or lighting for this photo? Does the lighting or<br />

exposure compliment the context of this photo?<br />

For example, in the image below, the idea of the photo<br />

shoot was to lay emphasis on the model’s skin and<br />

body structure so I needed to use a moderately harsh<br />

light to create specular highlights on the model’s dark<br />

skin.<br />

apportioning enough space to the main elements in<br />

the picture, it is about allowing the viewer to capture<br />

the most important element in the picture at a glance.<br />

This can be done through the use of colour, (using a<br />

particular colour for that element to ensure it catches<br />

attention), focusing, lightning etc. It can also be<br />

achieved by intensifying the artistic element that drives<br />

the message for example, the texture.<br />

An example of visual weight misappropriation is an<br />

image that has the subject in front while putting the<br />

complementary element at the back but adjusting<br />

the focus so that that the element in the background<br />

is sharper than the main subject. The element that<br />

catches the most attention in the picture has the most<br />

visual weight so make sure you know where the visual<br />

weight is, and should be, if there’s a difference.<br />

COMPOSITION<br />

This has to do with how the elements in the photo are<br />

arranged in order of importance or in sequence. There<br />

could be as many as 5 elements or more. Ask yourself<br />

the questions; Did I properly arrange the elements?<br />

Did I make the most important element conspicuous?<br />

For example, in a photo that has elements that look<br />

similar on both sides, using a symmetry composition<br />

(so that when split into two halves the elements on<br />

both sides are similar) can be very accurate like in the<br />

picture below.<br />

VISUAL WEIGHT<br />

Another thing that falls under technical judgment is the<br />

visual weight of the photo which is often overlooked<br />

and underrated. Visual weight is about more than<br />

SHARPNESS AND DEPTH OF FIELD<br />

It is important to review if you have used the right depth<br />

of field for the image. For instance, in a landscape<br />

photo where there are mountains and several other<br />

natural elements, if the photo is taken so that just a few<br />

elements are sharp versus having every element sharp<br />

by using a wide depth of field, it would defeat the<br />

purpose of that particular photo. On the other hand,<br />

newborn photography essentially requires shallow<br />

depth of field to be used so as to express the tender<br />

nature of the subject.<br />

56 <strong>NZPhotographer</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!