NHEG-Magazine-September-October
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
www.NewHeightsEducation.org<br />
www.NewHeightsEducation.org<br />
Parents can help to control these costs by being more discerning about various college expenses.<br />
Apprenticeship programs offer an alternative to college by providing a signaling mechanism for potential employers that goes<br />
beyond a degree or credential. And more big companies like Apple, Google, and Netflix no longer list a college degree as a<br />
requirement to get hired for certain high-paying jobs.<br />
College costs are rising for a variety of reasons, including more bureaucratic indulgences and more government regulations,<br />
and student loan debt is ballooning. Parents can help to control these costs by being more discerning about various college<br />
offerings and expenses, guiding their child to consider leaner or more innovative higher education programs, and suggesting<br />
college majors that will most likely enable that college investment to pay off with the least debt.<br />
Moreover, parents as taxpayers can hold off on supporting more public funding for higher education—at least until they see if<br />
their tax dollars are actually going toward a more educated citizenry and not some college bureaucrat’s six-figure salary.<br />
The History and<br />
Results of America’s<br />
Disastrous Public<br />
School System, Part I<br />
Source: The Foundation for Economic Education (FEE)<br />
https://fee.org/<br />
The earliest ancestor to our system of<br />
government-mandated schooling comes<br />
from 16th-century Germany.<br />
By Mike Margeson - Justin Spears<br />
Monday, May 13, 2019<br />
While it’s almost universally understood that the American school system is underperforming, “reform,” too, is almost universally<br />
prescribed as the solution. Yet in other walks of life, bad ideas are not reformed—they are eliminated and replaced with<br />
better ones. Our school system is rarely identified as a bad idea.<br />
The system is reflexively left alone while the methods are the bad ideas that get cycled in and out: open concept schools,<br />
multiple intelligences, project-based learning, universal design for learning, merit-based pay, vouchers, charters, and most<br />
recently, educational neuroscience. Every decade or so we are told by the pedagogic experts that they have found an answer<br />
to our school’s problems. The trouble is, they’re looking right past the problem.<br />
Schooling Monopoly<br />
The problem is the monopoly that schooling has gained over education. According to the National Center for Education<br />
Statistics, approximately 97 percent of kids go through traditional schooling (as opposed to homeschooling or unschooling),<br />
and just over 90 percent of those attend government schools. That is to say, there is basically one accepted way to educate<br />
kids today: school them.<br />
Given the relatively poor performance of American students on international achievement tests, you would think schooling<br />
might receive a second look. Quite the opposite, actually. It is instead made mandatory, and taxpayers are forced to subsidize<br />
it. This begs the question: Why would the government continue to propagate a system that produces such questionable<br />
results? The answer lies in their motives, and their motives are best understood by reviewing a brief history of compulsory<br />
schooling.<br />
Roots in Germany<br />
The earliest ancestor to our system of government-mandated schooling comes from 16th-century Germany. Martin Luther<br />
was a fierce advocate for state-mandated public schooling, not because he wanted kids to become educated, but because he<br />
wanted them to become educated in the ways of Lutheranism. Luther was resourceful and understood the power of the state<br />
in his quest to reform Jews, Catholics, and other non-believers. No less significant was fellow reformist John Calvin, who also<br />
advocated heavily for forced schooling. Calvin was particularly influential among the later Puritans of New England (Rothbard,<br />
1979).<br />
Considering compulsory schooling has such deep roots in Germany, it should be no surprise that the precursor to our<br />
American government school system came directly from the German state of Prussia. In 1807, fresh off a humiliating defeat<br />
by the French during the War of the Fourth Coalition, the Germans instituted a series of vast, sweeping societal reforms. Key<br />
within this movement was education reform, and one of the most influential educational reformers in Germany at the time<br />
was a man named Johann Gottlieb Fichte. Like Luther before him, Fichte saw compulsory schooling as a tool to indoctrinate<br />
kids, not educate them. Fichte describes his aim for Germany’s “new education” this way:<br />
100 100 <strong>NHEG</strong> | GENiUS <strong>Magazine</strong> MAGAZINE | <strong>September</strong> | www.geniusmag.com<br />
- <strong>October</strong> 2019<br />
Then, in order to define more clearly the new education which I propose, I should reply that that very recognition of, and reliance<br />
upon, free will in the pupil is the first mistake of the old system and the clear confession of its impotence and futility.<br />
<strong>September</strong> - <strong>October</strong> 2019 | <strong>NHEG</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> 101