17.10.2019 Views

17102019 - FG cuts travels, estacodes for ministers, other officials

Vanguard Newspaper 17 October 2019

Vanguard Newspaper 17 October 2019

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50—VANGUARD, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2019<br />

08152060944<br />

Independence of judiciary programmed<br />

to fail ——Adegboruwa, SAN<br />

By Henry Ojelu<br />

Mr<br />

Ebun-Olu<br />

Adegboruwa is one<br />

of the lawyers recently<br />

conferred with the rank of<br />

Senior Advocate of Nigeria.<br />

In this interview, he shares<br />

his view on why the fight <strong>for</strong><br />

the independence of the<br />

judiciary would be tough.<br />

He also spoke on <strong>other</strong><br />

sundry issues.<br />

Excerpt:<br />

World Day Against<br />

Death Penalty was<br />

marked last week.<br />

Considering the fact that<br />

governors are reluctant<br />

to sign death warrant,<br />

shouldn’t there be some<br />

<strong>for</strong>m of respite <strong>for</strong> death<br />

row inmates in the<br />

country?<br />

Well, I have become<br />

sympathetic to the plight of<br />

condemned prisoners<br />

especially those awaiting<br />

sentence- to be hanged or to<br />

be shot according to how the<br />

judge directed. I have met<br />

with a death row inmate who<br />

was later pardoned. He<br />

narrated to me the trauma of<br />

awaiting death every day.<br />

For him every day is death.<br />

Once it is 2:00am, he will<br />

wake up because the worst<br />

thing that can happen to you<br />

is <strong>for</strong> them to wake you up<br />

and take you to hang. What<br />

those people go through can<br />

never be imagined and this<br />

was what led Dr Olisa<br />

Agbakoba, SAN to go to<br />

court. His contention was<br />

that keeping people awaiting<br />

execution is a <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

torture. Of course the court<br />

didn’t agree with him up to<br />

this point, what they said is<br />

that they still have a right.<br />

I totally accept the view of<br />

many of our colleagues who<br />

says that the people who are<br />

been kept in prison awaiting<br />

execution are under serious<br />

torture. Their rights are been<br />

validated every day, by the<br />

state while they are awaiting<br />

execution. And I think<br />

something should be done to<br />

ensure that, correctional<br />

strategies are employed to<br />

see that if they truly change,<br />

if the society can still benefit<br />

from them be<strong>for</strong>e they are<br />

executed.<br />

<strong>FG</strong> recently changed<br />

the name of our prisons<br />

to Correctional Services<br />

Centres. Is this the<br />

solution to the problems<br />

with our prisons?<br />

I don’t think transiting<br />

from Nigeria Prison Service<br />

to Correctional Service<br />

Centre is sufficient to<br />

ameliorate the problems we<br />

have within the prison<br />

system. The challenge we<br />

have in the prison is the<br />

infrastructure. These are<br />

*Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa, SAN<br />

prisons that were built by the<br />

colonial masters. The mind<br />

set then was to subjugate and<br />

punish the locals who are<br />

clamouring<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

independence. Those prisons<br />

were built <strong>for</strong> the purpose of<br />

punishing. The second issue<br />

is congestion. Most of those<br />

prisons have exceeded their<br />

maximum capacity three<br />

times. What is required in the<br />

prison is not all about<br />

documentary re<strong>for</strong>ms. We<br />

should talk about the real<br />

infrastructure. How do you<br />

ensure that people who leave<br />

that place don’t go back to<br />

crime?<br />

The greatest re<strong>for</strong>m that<br />

you can achieve in a prison is<br />

through judiciary because the<br />

problem of Nigeria prison is<br />

awaiting trial cases. They<br />

constitute 80% of the<br />

population of the prisons. The<br />

people who have been<br />

convicted surprisingly are<br />

less than 30%. Some have<br />

been going to court <strong>for</strong> more<br />

than 9 to 10 years such that<br />

even if they had been<br />

convicted the period which<br />

they will spend will be lesser<br />

than that which they have<br />

spent awaiting trial.<br />

So many factors combine<br />

together to make it<br />

impossible to achieve any<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m in the prison system.<br />

So if really you want to re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

the prisons, you should start<br />

with the court, to ensure that<br />

courts are decongested. This<br />

way, those cases can be heard<br />

and then those who are free<br />

can be discharged. Those who<br />

want to be convicted can be<br />

convicted, when you finish<br />

with the court then move to<br />

the prison proper to rebuild<br />

it<br />

Ẏou can’t have correctional<br />

prison facilities in the middle<br />

of town. At the time they built<br />

Ikoyi prisons, to the British,<br />

Ikoyi was a bush at that time.<br />

That location cannot achieve<br />

any expansion today because<br />

there are commercials<br />

buildings everywhere. There<br />

T h e<br />

greatest<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m that<br />

you can<br />

achieve in a<br />

prison is<br />

through<br />

judiciary<br />

because the<br />

problem of<br />

Nigeria<br />

prison is<br />

awaiting<br />

trial cases<br />

is nothing you can<br />

do. You can’t<br />

d e m o l i s h<br />

people’s houses.<br />

Government<br />

should look <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>other</strong> areas where<br />

there is land and<br />

build proper<br />

correctional<br />

facilities with<br />

recreation<br />

facilities and<br />

opportunities <strong>for</strong><br />

learning. There<br />

should be schools<br />

there and small<br />

s c a l e<br />

empowerment<br />

system. You<br />

can’t retain this<br />

old structure and<br />

expect to<br />

continue to<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m peoples<br />

mind. It can’t<br />

work. So I believe<br />

that when you<br />

really want to<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m the prison<br />

system, it goes<br />

beyond name<br />

change.<br />

Since his<br />

assumption of<br />

office, the<br />

Chief Justice of<br />

Nigeria has<br />

b e e n<br />

clamouring<br />

<strong>for</strong><br />

independence of the<br />

judiciary. Is there any<br />

<strong>other</strong> way that the<br />

judiciary can <strong>for</strong>cefully<br />

regain its independence?<br />

I doubt it <strong>for</strong> many reasons.<br />

Talking can help but not in the<br />

way that we are currently<br />

doing it. The judiciary<br />

deserves to be put in a state<br />

of emergency. Judges are<br />

actually weeping. Judges are<br />

unofficial members of the Bar<br />

Association so it is the<br />

responsibility of lawyers to<br />

take up the fight <strong>for</strong> the<br />

independence and autonomy<br />

of the Judiciary. The judge is<br />

a civil servant, and civil<br />

servants are only to be seen<br />

not heard.<br />

I have never seen any civil<br />

society where judge take up<br />

the struggle <strong>for</strong><br />

independence, autonomy or<br />

issues of welfare. It is always<br />

the lawyers that pursue that<br />

course. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, the<br />

Nigerian Bar Association is<br />

factionalized. The problems<br />

in the general polity have also<br />

found itself into the Bar. Take<br />

<strong>for</strong> instance, the Justice<br />

Onnogen’s incident. The NBA<br />

met and took decision to<br />

embark on a strike. The strike<br />

was not successful in states<br />

that were sympathetic to the<br />

then CJN, but states<br />

especially in the North that<br />

were sympathetic to the<br />

president did not comply with<br />

strike. The problem will<br />

probably continue since the<br />

politicians have also found<br />

themselves into the Bar. But<br />

what must we do? I think that<br />

is becoming clearer. Senior<br />

lawyers must find a way to<br />

engage with those who are in<br />

power. Take this regime <strong>for</strong><br />

instance; there are very many<br />

senior lawyers in the cabinet.<br />

They can actually work with<br />

the bar to achieve a society<br />

where the judiciary is<br />

independent. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately,<br />

independence of the judiciary<br />

cannot be achieved because<br />

there is a deliberate policy of<br />

the executive not to allow the<br />

judiciary to function. It is<br />

deliberate so it is not a matter<br />

of this Buhari’s<br />

administration.<br />

The reason is very simple.<br />

In any society, the executive<br />

is responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>mulating<br />

and executing policies; the<br />

judiciary to interpret and the<br />

legislature to <strong>for</strong>mulate and<br />

make laws. But the executive<br />

come in contact with the<br />

people all the time. It is their<br />

actions that people feel all the<br />

time. So invariably, 80% of<br />

the cases that find themselves<br />

up to the court are<br />

challenging the actions of the<br />

executive.<br />

So in that regard, the<br />

executive takes it as a point<br />

of duty to starve the judiciary<br />

of fund such that those who<br />

are challenging the executive<br />

impunity are been sent a<br />

message to say it does not pay<br />

you to go to court. They are<br />

invariably saying, ‘You<br />

cannot reverse what I have<br />

done. I control the court. If I<br />

cannot get through to them<br />

by giving direct instruction,<br />

I will frustrate them by<br />

showing that your case is not<br />

heard on time. There will be<br />

no electricity; I will not<br />

appoint enough judges. That<br />

actually is the underlining<br />

factor why the executive is<br />

not interested to allow the<br />

judiciary to have true<br />

independence.<br />

So where lies the<br />

solution to all this?<br />

It is rare <strong>for</strong> me to commend<br />

the president but I believe we<br />

should support his policies<br />

that all monies meant <strong>for</strong> state<br />

judiciaries should no longer<br />

go through the governors. So<br />

what am saying is that, if we<br />

team up with the president<br />

and ensure that, that law<br />

becomes effective and the<br />

judges have hold on their<br />

money, we have freed them<br />

from that dominion of the<br />

executive and that is the first<br />

responsibility of the bar to<br />

ensure that the judges gets<br />

their money.<br />

The second solution is this;<br />

we must open a register and<br />

interact with the judges. The<br />

bar must rise up and speak<br />

with one voice <strong>for</strong> any judge<br />

who is a victim of any <strong>for</strong>m of<br />

executive intimidation. As<br />

we are trying to <strong>for</strong>ce the<br />

executive to respect the<br />

judiciary, lawyers should<br />

respect the judiciary by<br />

refusing to partake in any<br />

corrupt.<br />

C<br />

M<br />

Y<br />

K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!