18.12.2012 Views

Kearl Oil Sands Project

Kearl Oil Sands Project

Kearl Oil Sands Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

contrary to Canada’s submission, the Panel should not place any weight on prior<br />

consultation on other projects, including the original Jackpine application, as evidence<br />

that Aboriginal groups have been, or will be consulted. The Panel must consider each<br />

case separately and should not use past dealings as a reason to avoid assessing the<br />

adequacy of consultation at this time.<br />

IV. It is not premature to assess the adequacy of the Crown’s<br />

consultation<br />

62. It does not matter that consultation may not yet be complete or is still ongoing.<br />

The Panel’s constitutional duty is to consider whether the Crown’s constitutional duty of<br />

consultation has been fulfilled with respect to the subject matter of the application<br />

before it. 62 That is, whether the Crown’s duty to consult and accommodate has been<br />

met up to the point of the Panel’s decision. 63<br />

63. The Panel cannot avoid the duty to consider the adequacy of the Crown’s<br />

consultation on the basis that Alberta has put in place the Policy and Guidelines under<br />

which it claims to retain the responsibility for making such determinations. 64 To suggest<br />

that ACFN and other First Nations are free to put evidence before the Board as to the<br />

adverse impacts of the <strong>Project</strong> on their rights and interests and then state the Crown’s<br />

consultation efforts with regard to those impacts can be evaluated by Alberta at some<br />

future date, “is to miss the point of the duty to consult.” 65<br />

64. Alberta, following the ERCB decision in Osum, says that it would be premature<br />

for the Panel to determine the adequacy of Crown consultation when a) this is all part of<br />

a broader consultation process and there is more consultation on the way; and b) the<br />

Panel process will provide the Crown with an opportunity to assess what further<br />

consultation is required. Canada takes a different approach to the prematurity<br />

argument, arguing that the Panel process is a planning tool which guides and informs<br />

62 Kwikwetlem, at para. 13.<br />

63 Ibid. at paras. 15, 70.<br />

64 Ibid. at paras. 13-14, 67-70.<br />

65 Ibid. at para. 67.<br />

[ 20 ]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!