Mountain Times: Volume 49, number 10: March 4-10, 2020
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12 • OPINION<br />
The <strong>Mountain</strong> <strong>Times</strong> • <strong>March</strong> 4-<strong>10</strong>, <strong>2020</strong><br />
OP-ED<br />
Public Access Television is crucial for transparency<br />
Historically, PEG TV was funded<br />
mainly through fees paid by the cable<br />
industry, as part of the deal...<br />
By Jim Condos<br />
For decades, Vermont’s Community Media Centers have<br />
provided our residents direct access to each other, our government<br />
and our community events. Now, more than ever,<br />
we need a strong network of public, educational and government<br />
(“PEG TV”) stations and their Community Media<br />
Centers to provide these important services that keep our<br />
civic engagement strong.<br />
I have been a longtime<br />
advocate for government<br />
transparency. The public’s<br />
right to know is critical to a<br />
democracy where we can<br />
audit our local, state, and<br />
federal government agencies, and ultimately hold them<br />
accountable. My days on the South Burlington City Council<br />
taught me first-hand the important role PEG TV plays in<br />
keeping our residents informed and engaged.<br />
Historically, PEG TV was funded mainly through fees<br />
paid by the cable industry, as part of the deal that we all<br />
made with cable providers to use our common infrastructure.<br />
In recent months, the Federal Communications<br />
Commission has changed some of their rules so that cable<br />
providers can choose to contribute less to community media<br />
centers. At the same time, “cord cutting” means that less<br />
overall funding will be available from this source over time.<br />
Last year, the State of Vermont rightly recognized the<br />
importance of our Community Media Centers by creating<br />
a summer study committee to look at how we can ensure<br />
their vitality if their primary funding source is reduced. The<br />
study committee found that<br />
the answer to that question<br />
is complex because of federal<br />
preemption, lawsuits,<br />
and overlapping legal jurisdictions.<br />
This year, the committee<br />
has put forward a bill to allow the state to hire experts who<br />
understand the complexity of the issues and make some<br />
recommendations about how to support and preserve our<br />
PEG TV stations for Vermonters.<br />
I support this bill (S.318/H.744) and the accompanying<br />
funding for the expert study it allows. Our community<br />
media centers provide access to our local and state government<br />
processes, allow us to learn from each other, and<br />
allow families across Vermont to enjoy access to a variety of<br />
community events that they might not be able to attend in<br />
person.<br />
As a long-time proponent of the public’s right to know,<br />
I appreciate the transparency and accessibility that PEG<br />
TV provides. Not everyone can go to every meeting or fully<br />
understand the context of board discussions through their<br />
minutes.<br />
Our community media centers provide a valuable<br />
window into state and local government. I remember when<br />
PEG TV began back in the early 1990s, and a member of<br />
our city council was opposed because our citizens might<br />
actually know what we were doing at our meetings. That is<br />
exactly the point!<br />
In addition to making valuable information accessible<br />
for Vermonters, they provide 200 jobs across the state. We<br />
need to ensure that the 25 Community Media Centers in<br />
Vermont are well supported and strong for the long term.<br />
Their services are crucial so that we can all be more civically<br />
engaged.<br />
I hope the Vermont Legislature will support the PEG TV<br />
bill and provide this needed small investment, to ensure we<br />
can move forward with the study and maintain this valuable<br />
public service.<br />
Jim Condos is the Vermont secretary of state.<br />
By Pat Bagley, The Salt Lake Tribune, Utah<br />
By Bob Englehart<br />
><br />
Candidates: Big donations don’t always support bad actors.<br />
from page <strong>10</strong><br />
beholden to the donors?<br />
Do you think that little of<br />
his character and honor<br />
and patriotism that he’d<br />
immediately sell his nation<br />
up the Volga based on<br />
how many digits appear<br />
to the left of the period on<br />
the donor check?<br />
No, I don’t think that<br />
you would think that of<br />
Sanders, nor of Warren.<br />
So, then, why do you<br />
think that of a decorated<br />
war-veteran Rhodes<br />
Scholar who has never<br />
shown a single tendency<br />
to do this?<br />
Could it, possibly, be<br />
that this angle is the only<br />
thing that the Warren and<br />
Sanders campaigns can<br />
think of to throw shade at<br />
Buttigieg?<br />
I am not saying that<br />
you need to immediately<br />
switch allegiance to Buttigieg<br />
— or others now<br />
that he’s out of the race.<br />
Rather, I am saying that<br />
you should not demonize<br />
a candidate based on<br />
a false damnation by his<br />
competition.<br />
Also, Sanders and<br />
Warren had better start<br />
courting these fellow<br />
American corporations<br />
and billionaires if they<br />
want to be able to beat the<br />
incumbent in November.<br />
The GOP team is spending<br />
hand over fist, plastering<br />
their message on<br />
every airwave and screen<br />
nation- and worldwide.<br />
They have a ton of donations,<br />
and they are using<br />
them.<br />
Let me ask you this<br />
final thought: if they use<br />
their superior political<br />
funding to drown out the<br />
Democratic candidates’<br />
message and claim another<br />
disastrous four years of<br />
looting and plundering<br />
our nation, will it really<br />
matter how big or how<br />
small the losing candidates’<br />
donations were?<br />
Matt Williams<br />
New Haven<br />
Climate change: A threat to all life, an existential problem.<br />
><br />
from page <strong>10</strong><br />
settlement to electric<br />
vehicle expansion are<br />
not enough. These funds<br />
will run out and our reliance<br />
on fossil fuels will<br />
continue. Signing onto<br />
the Transportation and<br />
Climate Initiative, or TCI,<br />
is a necessary first step;<br />
it is shameful you were<br />
involved in its development<br />
and are now withdrawing<br />
support because<br />
of increased consumer<br />
costs. Furthermore, Senator<br />
Pollina’s Green New<br />
Deal proposal for Vermont<br />
demonstrates the<br />
state’s carbon footprint<br />
can be reduced without<br />
hurting the economy<br />
for low-income folks.<br />
Climate change action<br />
creates new economic<br />
opportunities and is<br />
largely supported locally,<br />
nationally, and globally.<br />
You have no excuse.<br />
Your administrative<br />
priorities are unconvincing.<br />
Your policies<br />
inadequately protect the<br />
environment, vulnerable<br />
people, and future<br />
generations. Climate<br />
change threatens all life,<br />
human and nonhuman.<br />
This is a global issue; you<br />
cannot promise wellbeing<br />
on an unhealthy<br />
planet. Vermont should<br />
be a leader in pioneering<br />
solutions; this is how to<br />
grow and strengthen the<br />
workforce. Youth will not<br />
want to remain in a state<br />
that is not actively fighting<br />
for their future.<br />
Governor Scott, you<br />
have so much opportunity<br />
for creative collaboration<br />
and solutions.<br />
Make climate action a<br />
source of pride and attraction,<br />
not disappointment.<br />
You asked protesters<br />
to give you the chance<br />
to speak at your State of<br />
the State address. We are<br />
listening, are you?<br />
Jaden Hill,<br />
Middlebury