St Mary Redcliffe Project 450 RIBA 1 Stage End Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NEXT STEPS<br />
This stage-end report and its findings will be presented to the P<strong>450</strong> <strong>Project</strong> Board on 12 Aug<br />
2019. Subject to <strong>Project</strong> Board approval, it is proposed to progress immediately to <strong>RIBA</strong> 2, to<br />
achieve the following objectives:<br />
1. CONSULTANT INPUTS<br />
To date, the proposals have been subject to only high-level conceptual review. At <strong>RIBA</strong> 2, the<br />
consultant disciplines will develop outline strategies for <strong>St</strong>ructures, Mechanical & Electrical<br />
Performance, Sustainability (including renewable technologies) and Landscape. These strategies<br />
will further examine the feasibility of the emerging design and provide the basis for the<br />
development of more robust construction costs<br />
2. RISK REGISTER<br />
The current scheme is informed by the available survey information. The development of a risk<br />
register will enable the project team to identify further pieces of site analysis, such as additional<br />
archaeological, arboricultural, and ecological surveys that <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong> might choose to<br />
procure in order to further de-risk the project’s development<br />
3. INTERFACE DETAILS<br />
As noted within section 11.0, the consultation to date has consistently referred to the criticality<br />
of detail. During <strong>RIBA</strong> 2, the design team will develop larger-scale drawings of each of the key<br />
interfaces to explore the language of change, maximise reversibility, and provide a basis for moredetailed<br />
consultation with statutory and advisory consultees<br />
4. PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION<br />
In accordance with both best practice and the requirements of the Canynges Society, the project<br />
team will initiate further pre-application consultations with, particularly, the DAC, HE, and BCC<br />
to seek feedback prior to the commencement of subsequent work-stages<br />
5. PUBLIC CONSULTATION<br />
The above details and more-comprehensive declaration of the proposals will also provide the<br />
basis for further public consultation. The project team therefore propose to provide monthly<br />
Wider SMR Updates to target increased ownership and engagement within the church’s<br />
congregation and community<br />
Finally, the adjacent programme provides an overall timescale for these activities, and confirms<br />
the project’s continued governance, via monthly Design Team Meetings, followed by Monthly<br />
<strong>Project</strong> Board Meetings