St Mary Redcliffe Project 450 RIBA 1 Stage End Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4.0 CONSULTATION - UNDERSTANDING THE NEED<br />
During the architectural design competition, each of the shortlisted schemes was displayed<br />
within <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong>’s North Transept. The feedback received was honest, resistant to the<br />
proposed change, and, no-doubt, illustrative of the great value attached to <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong> by its<br />
community and congregation alike<br />
Crucially, it demonstrated that the community and congregation of <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong>:<br />
• Has strong-held views on the church’s progression<br />
• Wished to be engaged in the design process, and<br />
• Was unconvinced of the need for change<br />
To address the latter point, we began by challenging both the competition brief and statement<br />
of need, via a series of informal conversations and workshops with separate church departments<br />
and individuals, including The Vestry, Music, Education, The Vicar, Assistant Vicar, Parish<br />
Administrator, etc<br />
The interviews focussed on key operational questions, such as:<br />
• What works?<br />
• What doesn’t?<br />
• What are the constraints?<br />
But also included more open, leading questions, such as, if we dared to dream:<br />
• What needs could <strong>St</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Redcliffe</strong> address?<br />
• What could the church become? and:<br />
• What would this look like to you?<br />
From the responses, we gained a more detailed understanding of church operations, the multiple<br />
user groups, and their diverse needs. This information was recorded in transcripts and, ultimately,<br />
consolidated into a revised spatial and aspirational brief