29.04.2020 Views

HIGHGATE NEW TOWN PHASE 1, CAMDEN Community-led Conservation Guidance for inclusion in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area and Application for Grade II* Listing

This report presents community-led Conservation Area guidance and an application for Grade II* Listing for Highgate New Town Phase 1 (HNT), Camden, London, designed by architect Peter Tábori and constructed 1967-78. The study it presents was produced by a working-group comprising residents from HNT, supported by their Tenants and Residents Association (TRA) the Whittington Estate Residents Association (WERA) and community/heritage researcher Tom Davies (AHO) together with architectural historian Professor Mark Swenarton as consultant. The report sets out conservation guidance, developed through a community-led process and specific to HNT, for inclusion in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area (DPCA). This is followed by the application for Grade II* Listing for the deliberation of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Historic England (HE), which seeks to recognise the national significance of HNT as exemplary public-housing. These are made on the basis of its exceptional heritage values, the importance of retaining community spaces for its community and strong resident support from that community.

This report presents community-led Conservation Area guidance and an application for Grade II* Listing for Highgate New Town Phase 1 (HNT), Camden, London, designed by architect Peter Tábori and constructed 1967-78. The study it presents was produced by a working-group
comprising residents from HNT, supported by their Tenants and Residents Association (TRA) the Whittington Estate Residents Association (WERA) and community/heritage researcher Tom Davies (AHO) together with architectural historian Professor Mark Swenarton as consultant. The report sets out conservation guidance, developed through a community-led process and specific to HNT, for inclusion in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area (DPCA). This is followed by the application for Grade II* Listing for the deliberation of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Historic England (HE), which seeks to recognise the national significance of HNT as exemplary public-housing. These are made on the basis of its exceptional heritage values, the importance of retaining community spaces for its community and strong resident support from that community.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.3.4 The scheme began in joint venture with neighbouring Islington Council; the Islington side eventually

becoming the Girdlestone Estate completed in 1975/76 (Willats 1986). The architects at this early

stage were Richard Gibson for Camden and Norman Cedar for Islington. Tábori replaced Gibson in

late ’68, when he left Camden. Something of Gibson’s legacy remains in the layout of streets set at

right angles to Dartmouth Park Hill, which Tábori developed (see 4.8).

4.3.5 The Retcar Street section (north) of HNT was given first priority because conditions were perceived

to be worst there, no doubt aided by the fact that the council had already begun to acquisition

houses. An alternate view of this is that the threat of CPO hanging over Highgate New Town

prompted neglect and a lack of investment (Webb 1972: 148) The 1966 scheme was primarily

residential and would see an increase from 1800 residents to 2060, which would be sufficiently

above the housing yardstick density of 136 persons per acre (ppa.); the lower limit for subsidies

to councils (required to make the scheme viable) as set by the Ministry of Housing and Local

Government (MHLG).

4.3.6 The acquisition by Compulsory purchase order (CPO), requiring approval by the MHLG, dragged

out between ‘68-69 and resulted in a public enquiry delaying the start of construction. During this

time Sydney Cook, recently appointed head of architecture at the new London Borough of Camden

(by merging St Pancras, Hampstead and Holborn under the Civic Act of 1965) engaged Tábori on

another scheme at Polygon Road in the south of the borough where he designed “a four-storey

terrace embracing two two-storey ones, arranged on five levels. These are divided at ninety

degrees, creating an L-shape, so that every flat gets some southern light.” Polygon Road provided

Tábori the opportunity to test out ideas for HNT (Watkinson 2019: 2). It achieved a density of 220

ppa. and has been described as “A scheme of panache with stairs linking up between units” (Webb

1972: 148). By the time matters were resolved, a decision had been taken to progress Phase

1 of Highgate to the north of Raydon Street (HNT), whilst Phase 2 would follow at a later date.

Redevelopment east of Chester Road was dropped in preference for retaining the existing terraces.

4.4 Peter Tábori

4.4.1 Before describing the scheme that Peter Tábori produced and Kenneth Adie delivered for HNT an

account of Tábori as an architect is required so as to contextualise the influences borne out in HNT.

It is also important to note that whilst Adie ensured exacting standards in construction, the scheme

as completed is largely as designed by Tábori. Whilst some changes were suggested by Sydney

Cook’s successor Alfred Rigby, only the glass canopies above stairwells at Lulot Gardens are

recorded as having been implemented (Swenarton 2017 & Pers Comm. Watkinson: 2018).

4.4.2 Peter Tábori moved to London in 1956, following the Russian invasion of Tábori’s home country

of Hungary during which he was incarcerated for 6 months. Arriving in London, Tábori studied at

Regent Street Polytechnic (today Westminster University), where his tutors and critics included

fellow architects James Stirling, Neave Brown, Eldred Evans and Richard Rogers. He earnt

a travel scholarship in the first year which he used to travel in northern Italy, visiting Siena,

Florence and Pisa. At the end of his second year Tábori took a break at architect James Stirling’s

recommendation, during which he worked for fellow Hungarian Ernö Goldfinger. Goldfinger

undertook to mentor Tábori which he described as “every night [it] was like a tutorial” (Swenarton

2017: 109). This mentoring is reflected in a shared interest in Pre-Modernist buildings and form

and the rich wood interiors of HNT and Goldfinger’s Willow Road (built 1939) (McKay 2006: 155).

The former of these Swenarton describes as having a “sense of the mysterious and formal” which

is completely unlike the clarity of Neave Brown’s interiors and links them to Tábori’s Hungarian

background which suggests a further link with Goldfinger (Swenarton 2017: 130)

4.4.3 On returning to Regent Street in 1963-64, Tábori was inspired by tutor Richard Rogers’ enthusiasm

for mass production (from Eames, Soriano and others see 4.4.7) and began his thesis exploring

industrialized housing typologies under Rogers’ supervision who recommended he use real sites

and briefs. The Italian-born Rogers also encouraged Tábori to draw on experience from travels

visiting Italy’s hill-towns, providing a likely link between the focus of the thesis on vertical facades

and hung balconies, and the terraces and externalised features (stairs, accesses etc.) of HNT and

Polygon Road. Swenarton cites San Gimignano, Umbria as an example, in addition to others he

visited. Whilst the hill-towns and terraced sites were being made popular at the time by coverage

in the Architectural Review (AR), this was more in the Picturesque tradition advanced by Gordon

Cullen characterised by his “interest in a psychological approach to form and the complex issues

surrounding urban renewal and the conservation of identity” and others rather than Tábori’s reading

of them as a source for urban renewal (Appleyard 1986: 127, Orillard 2012: 728 & Swenarton 2017:

20-21).

Adjacent- Fig. 13: Polygon Road (TD)

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!