29.04.2020 Views

HIGHGATE NEW TOWN PHASE 1, CAMDEN Community-led Conservation Guidance for inclusion in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area and Application for Grade II* Listing

This report presents community-led Conservation Area guidance and an application for Grade II* Listing for Highgate New Town Phase 1 (HNT), Camden, London, designed by architect Peter Tábori and constructed 1967-78. The study it presents was produced by a working-group comprising residents from HNT, supported by their Tenants and Residents Association (TRA) the Whittington Estate Residents Association (WERA) and community/heritage researcher Tom Davies (AHO) together with architectural historian Professor Mark Swenarton as consultant. The report sets out conservation guidance, developed through a community-led process and specific to HNT, for inclusion in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area (DPCA). This is followed by the application for Grade II* Listing for the deliberation of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Historic England (HE), which seeks to recognise the national significance of HNT as exemplary public-housing. These are made on the basis of its exceptional heritage values, the importance of retaining community spaces for its community and strong resident support from that community.

This report presents community-led Conservation Area guidance and an application for Grade II* Listing for Highgate New Town Phase 1 (HNT), Camden, London, designed by architect Peter Tábori and constructed 1967-78. The study it presents was produced by a working-group
comprising residents from HNT, supported by their Tenants and Residents Association (TRA) the Whittington Estate Residents Association (WERA) and community/heritage researcher Tom Davies (AHO) together with architectural historian Professor Mark Swenarton as consultant. The report sets out conservation guidance, developed through a community-led process and specific to HNT, for inclusion in the Dartmouth Park Conservation Area (DPCA). This is followed by the application for Grade II* Listing for the deliberation of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and Historic England (HE), which seeks to recognise the national significance of HNT as exemplary public-housing. These are made on the basis of its exceptional heritage values, the importance of retaining community spaces for its community and strong resident support from that community.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This reinterpreted feature is a key part of the Italian influence at HNT, drawing inspiration from the

discrete informal routes of hill-towns and potentially the divisions of the Etruscan hill-town (see 4.8).

It previously provided informal short-cuts between residences, the greens and other recreation

spaces, but is currently closed by locked gates at two of the intersections. The other north-south

route is the former bridle-path bordering Highgate Cemetery (Swenarton 2017: 112).

4.7.4 Tábori’s approach to ‘the street’ takes an essentially two-fold interpretation of public and private

relating to Chermayeff and Alexander’s Community and Privacy (Chermayeff & Alexander 1963

& Swenarton 2017: 112). In this, space is defined as public (beyond the front door) or private

(behind it) removing the need for any semi-private areas and in externalising stairs and accesses,

avoiding any no-man’s land of internal circulation such as stairwells and lifts. It might be argued

that the shared landings and entrances and the foot and head of stairs represent a semi-public

space given that whilst they belong to the public their proprietorship is really held by adjoining

neighbours. At the same time, they remain public by virtue of their visual connection and interplay

with street. This achieves both Jane Jacob’s notion of eyes-on-the-street and Tábori’s wish to avoid

interim circulation space whilst presenting something of Chermayeff and Alexander’s locks through

proprietorship (Jacobs 2011: 44-45 & Swenarton 2017: 127).

4.7.5 Tábori describes this approach in a note to head architect Sydney Cook,

“-Low rise, very high density low cost project. Pedestrian level continuous at level 2 (street). Direct

entry from street. Sense of identity: each front door having its own street number…. – Pedestrian

access by [sic] self-policing: helps community spirit [and] neighbourliness. Other measures to

reinforce social interdependence, e.g. handed front doors, terraces double as deep front courts,

kitchens look out onto approach/toddlers play (and neighbours’) and mutual awareness vis-à-vis

person on a street and from kitchens” (Swenarton 2017: 113).

Fig. 22: Informal Square, Seggiano, Tuscany (TD)

Next-

Fig. 23: External Stairs at Lulot Gardens (TD)

Fig. 24: External Stairs, Arcidosso, Tuscany (TD)

Fig. 25: Egg and Spoon Race, Stoneleigh Terrace (Jo McCafferty)

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!