01.06.2020 Views

Summer 1 Teaching and Learning Newsletter

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Embracing Online PLD literacy in your subject:

A reflection of Kate Jones’ book

By David Irons

Page 3

In terms of Chapter 4 if we were still in

school I’d definitely try the speeding ticket

idea. It’s a big issue in Humanities that

students often give very short and

unsupported answers. A good example was

this year when we had a source question for

Year 9 that had a Nazi schoolbook

illustration and a series of questions such as

“How can we tell the Jewish man is the bad

character in the book?” what we hope for is

a detailed explanation of the Jewish

stereotype by the Nazi’s but often you’d get

an answer like “He looks bad” when in

reality you want them to write in a

complete sentence and give supporting

evidence. The main reason I think is

because perhaps in History where we often

require longer answers and students see a

time limit they think they’re going to

struggle. I think the speeding ticket would

help students slow down and take more

time to include the details in their work. I

like what the book says about it reinforcing

the idea that you don’t see just finishing

work as a reason for praise that it needs to

be of a good standard and thus reinforces

expectations of good quality work.

I wasn’t so keen on the SPaG watch idea as

I think it may take more “Training” for the

students than many of the other ideas. I

think though for a subject like say English

that have many more teaching hours a week

its an excellent tool. I just think with an

hour a week I’d struggle to get students

trained to where this is a normal activity as

it may be many weeks between us using it.

I can also see how it may be useful for say

PP or GT students by engaging them in a

different way. Alternatively it would be

something that if it was done across a whole

school could be very effective.

From my own experiences I agree with her

about popcorn reading. I’m not a fan as I

see students not taking it seriously and too

busy worrying about when it will be there

turn rather than focusing on what the

meaning of what is being read is. I like the

idea of giving students some prior time

with text though. I’ve often used the “Ok

two minutes scan read it and highlight any

words you don’t understand” approach

before going through sources as a class. I

also liked the book club idea and think it

can link brilliantly to History, for example

when we look at the World Wars we could

recommend Warhorse and even perhaps

have a postcard drop box for students

who’ve read it to do a little task such as

how does the work of fiction relate to the

facts they’ve learnt.

I like some of the ideas she talked about in

speaking and listening. Sadly it was very

tech heavy, not something I’ve ever been

blessed with in a school, the ideas though

could work well. I’ve once done a newsroom

lesson on Dunkirk where I had students

producing a newspaper but drip feeding

them information verbally. So for example

the lesson started off with an official

government announcement. Five minutes

later they could interview an officer from

the Navy and ask questions. Ten minutes

after that they got an interview with

Churchill etc. Students enjoyed the lesson

but it was kind of chaos, however I suspect

real life news rooms are pretty similar so

maybe a good simulation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!