12.07.2020 Views

SC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SC Findings and Recommendations of ABS CBN renewal of franchise.

SC Findings and Recommendations of ABS CBN renewal of franchise.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NTC confirmed that it directed ABS-CBN to wait for NTC’s guidelines prior to offering such

pay-per-view services. 49 ABS-CBN disregarded the directive of NTC when it continued to air

the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight.

ABS-CBN, contrary to the terms of its franchise, operated its pay-per-view (PPV) channel,

otherwise known as the Kapamilya Box Office, without a valid permit from the NTC. As per

NTC documents , the KBO PPV promo is a value added service authorized for ABS-CBN

Convergence, Inc. which is registered as a value-added service provider for

Telecommunications Carrier. 50

ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc. is not a legislative franchise holder for broadcasting operations.

ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc. is not authorized to use ABS-CBN’s digital frequency/ channels

assigned by the State or even ABS-CBN’s TV Plus Box. However, in almost all promo

mechanics of ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc., it required that subscribers also have the TV Plus

Box in order to watch the KBO shows. 51

To repeat, neither ABS-CBN nor ABS-CBN Convergence was authorized by the NTC or by

a legislative franchise to operate the TV Plus Box, or even charge subscribers for the KBO

service therein.

ABS-CBN TV Plus Box

system is akin to Cable

TV operations requiring

a separate legislative

franchise.

ABS-CBN’s legislative franchise is for Radio and Television broadcasting using the free-to-air

frequency granted by the State. However, its TV Plus Box, the encrypted channels therein,

and the KBO PPV service all pertain to the delivery of video and audio signals for a fee

through technological means including transmission via wired or wireless means.

ABS-CBN cites DOJ Opinion dated 11 June 2018 addressed to NTC to justify that it was

allowed to “commercialize” the digital channel 43 assigned to it by NTC. 52 However, the DOJ

Opinion expressly cautioned NTC to ensure that said “commercial activities” of TV

broadcasters should not amount to cable TV operations:

To summarize, it is our opinion that TV broadcasters may be

allowed to engage in Conditional Access (CA) or Conditional

Access System (CAS), more specifically to offer TV pay-per-view

services, provided that it does not amount to CATV service,

which shall only be considered as such if it is ‘for purposes

of providing multiple channel CATV service’. 53

Precisely, the Federation of International Cable TV Associations of the Philippines (FICTAP),

in opposing the franchise application of ABS-CBN, said that the TV Plus Box, the multiple

49

TSN of the 29 June 2020 hearing, at V-15.

50

Submission of ABS-CBN, copies of NTC Letters addressed to ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc.

51

Submission of ABS-CBN, copies of NTC Letters addressed to ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc.

52

Submission of ABS-CBN, copy DOJ Opinion dated 11 June 2018.

53

Submission of ABS-CBN, copy DOJ Opinion dated 11 June 2018; emphasis supplied.

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!