SC FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

workers. 81 The cases filed, decided and pending against ABS-CBN narrate its constant attempt
to circumvent labor laws and its apparent low regard for its employees.
In ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation v. Marlyn Nazareno et al. 82 , for example, the respondents
were production assistants hired continuously for more than 5 years for various radio programs
of ABS-CBN. In ruling that the respondents were regular employees, the Court stated that
“the primary standard therefore of determining regular employment is the reasonable
connection between the particular activity performed by the employee in relation to the usual
trade or business of the employer.” The Court further stated that even if one is a project or
seasonal employee, one who has rendered at least one year of service, whether continuous or
intermittent, is deemed regular with respect to the activity performed and while such activity
actually exists.”
In Augorio Dela Rosa v. ABS-CBN Corporation 83 , while the Court upheld the petitioner's dismissal
for just cause, the Court ruled that he was a regular employee since he was repeatedly hired
under fixed-term contracts. “For a fixed-term employment contract to be valid, it must be
shown that the fixed period was knowingly and voluntarily agreed upon by the parties, who
dealt with each other on more or less equal terms with no moral dominance being exercised
by the employer over the employee. Moreover, while fixed-term employment contracts have
been recognized to be valid, the Court has held that if it is apparent that the period has been
imposed to preclude acquisition of tenurial security by the employee, then such period must
be struck down for being contrary to law, morals, good customs, public order, and public
policy.” “Case law holds that the repeated engagement under a contract of hire is indicative of
the necessity and desirability of the employee’s work in the employer’s business; and if an
employee’s contract has been continuously extended or renewed for the same position, with
the same duties, without any interruption, then such employee is a regular employee.”
The Court held in Begino v. ABS-CBN Corporation 84 that notwithstanding the nomenclature of
the Talent Contracts and/or Project Assignment Forms and the terms and conditions
embodied therein, petitioners are regular employees of ABS-CBN. As cameramen, editors, and
reporters, petitioners were undoubtedly performing functions necessary and essential to ABS-
CBN’s business of broadcasting television and radio content. ABS-CBN’s repeated hiring of
petitioners for its long running news program positively indicates that the latter were ABS-
CBN’s regular employees.
In a number of cases, ABS-CBN has also been found guilty of bad faith in treating its
employees. In Farley Fulache et al. v. ABS-CBN, 85 after four drivers were found to be regular
employees by the Labor Arbiter and pending appeal by ABS-CBN, the latter dismissed the
four drivers supposedly since their jobs have been contracted out, In ruling against the
company, the Court held that ABS-CBN acted with plain and unadulterated bad faith in
dismissing its employees. “It [ABS-CBN] merely claimed that it was contracting out the
petitioners’ activities in the exercise of its management prerogative. ABS-CBN’s intent, of
course, based on the records, was to transfer the petitioners and their activities to a service
contractor without paying any attention to the requirements of our labor laws; hence, ABS-
CBN dismissed the petitioners when they refused to sign up with the service contractor. In
this manner, ABS-CBN fell into a downward spiral of irreconcilable legal positions, all
81
TSN of the 29 June 2020 hearing, at VII-9.
82
G.R. No. 164156, September 26, 2006.
83
G.R. No. 242875, August 28, 2019.
84
G.R. No. 199166, April 20, 2015.
85
G.R. No. 183810, January 21, 2010.
23