13.07.2020 Views

Magazine Helicopter Industry #102

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HI: Are you talking about the European Aviation Safety Agency<br />

(EASA)?<br />

CZ: Yes, absolutely. So the first question was about<br />

disinfection. Then came the segregation of the cabin. But<br />

cabin segregation also means separation of ventilation flows<br />

in air conditioning systems. We have therefore developed<br />

solutions to block or segregate air flows where possible. Then<br />

we received questions related to the operators’ operations.<br />

Wherever possible, we proceeded to validate their technical<br />

solutions. For example, there is a need for electrical current<br />

transformers. In order to be able to transport patients with<br />

their ventilators, solutions had to be found to allow them to<br />

operate on 220 volts AC, not 28 volts DC. Either we proposed<br />

solutions that exist on the market or customers proposed<br />

solutions that they wanted to implement. We did analyses<br />

and then issued what we call “No technical objections”,<br />

technical approvals.<br />

HI: Still under EASA?<br />

CZ: Yes and no: through our Authorized Designer Approval,<br />

we can give a “No Technical Objection”. It’s covered by our<br />

approval. Between the first questions and the first structured<br />

answer, generalized to all operators, we took less than two<br />

weeks.<br />

HI: Another sub-question: From which regions of the world did<br />

the first questions from come?<br />

CZ: Europe. It was kind of like tracking the virus. The<br />

questions arrived in Europe from French, Italian and then<br />

German operators. Two to three weeks later, they came<br />

from North America. Faced with these demands, we have<br />

undertaken several things. We have published briefing notes<br />

through which we can easily reach all of our clients. But we<br />

have also reinforced our usual communication flow to our<br />

customers that we considered critical in this pandemic: EMS<br />

operators (patient transport), para-public operators (police)<br />

and military operators, in order to understand their needs<br />

and pass on a certain amount of information to reassure<br />

them, for example about our supply chain or our logistics<br />

situation at the moment. We also heard their questions and<br />

considered solutions to their problems, because being close<br />

to the customers is something that is important to us. This<br />

led us to update the briefing notes we had developed. Finally,<br />

we reached our critical customers at least once every two<br />

weeks through our network of customer support managers.<br />

So we’re dealing with about 450 questions a week. Many<br />

of them concern the world of medical transport – EMS,<br />

protection, disinfection, separation. Now the customers are<br />

changing. Because the implementation of these solutions<br />

proves to be costly. Secondly, we received more and more<br />

questions about what they call PID (Patient Isolation<br />

Devices), those kinds of cocoons that completely isolate the<br />

patient. Here again, we have issued technical approvals and<br />

given advice on the integration of this equipment in the cabin,<br />

power supply, oxygenation. All this concerns professionals<br />

who are fighting the pandemic directly. But there were also<br />

other requests, in connection with the French operation<br />

“Résilience”, when the government fleets began to be used.<br />

We’ve seen the NH90s, the Cougars and the Caracal come<br />

on the scene. Through our organisation, which manages<br />

the French customer, we have developed solutions adapted<br />

jointly with the operators. We have also received comparable<br />

requests from Germany and Sweden. In their case, we do not<br />

have the same airworthiness constraints, because it is often<br />

the customer himself who is his own authority in this area:<br />

he can more easily, not certify, but qualify the solution. At<br />

the same time, we have all other customers to manage – we<br />

follow 420 EMS, parapublic and military operators. We have<br />

noticed, through the questions asked, that an evolution is<br />

taking place: we are dealing with more and more questions<br />

about the temporary immobilization of machines. For<br />

example, in the United States, almost all tourist flights are<br />

banned by the government. Customers then want to place<br />

their machines in temporary storage. They sometimes show<br />

a willingness to anticipate some maintenance tasks. We are<br />

therefore taking a lot of questions into account in this sense.<br />

All this leads us to think about how we can be proactive in<br />

the prospect of deconfinement of helicopters, because if<br />

customers have immobilized machines for several weeks or<br />

even months in sometimes hostile environments (extreme<br />

cold, heat, humidity, salty air), we must be proactive in order<br />

to limit the risks associated with return to service as much<br />

as possible.<br />

HI I 39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!