17.07.2020 Views

Clas Blomberg - Physics of life-Elsevier Science (2007)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

338 Part VIII. Applications

one per 3000 (see Loftfield, 1963; also Kirkwood et al., 1986). To get such values, it is

essential with proofreading processes. It can be estimated that this would correspond to a

loss of correct substrates through the proofreading step, that is the quantity above called

1, is about 20–30%, which is not a negligible energy or time loss in this process which

maybe is one of the most common, if not the most common, processes in a cell.

A pair of amino acids that have been particularly investigated because of a difficult

selection are isoleucine and valine. Both these have branched hydrocarbon side chains (see

Chapter 12), and that of isoleucine contains one methyl group (CH 3 ) more than valine. It is

a general fact that if a molecule with a large hydrocarbon group can be bound favourable to

an enzyme, then a slightly shorter chain can also be bound. This can be done by a pocket

into which the large group fits well. Then, also the short group fits. These amino acids also

have similar codes, and differ by the first base as isoleucine codes start with adenine while

valine codes start with guanine. There are reasonable ideas about the evolution of the genetic

code which propose that similar codes are results from the fact that these amino acids are

synthesised by similar processes. It is also reasonable that valine might be an early used

amino acid (it is the simplest of the two), while isoleucine is a later addition, produced by

an extension of valine production. The discrimination between isoleucine and valine is further

complicated as valine is more common and occurs more commonly in proteins than

isoleucine. Such non-mutual features should pose a problem for selection, and this might

be adjusted for by an appropriate choice of concentration ratios and, maybe, also modification

of the selection process features. As for isoleucine and valine, it was suggested that the

proofreading (rejection) step goes over a state where a wrong substrate, that is valine, is best

bounded and then the rejection rate gets a further factor larger than that of isoleucine. This

requires that a major competitor is recognised and then can be selected against.

30F

Further features of selection: error propagation

There are a number of quite interesting features associated with the selection processes. At

an early stage, one found and could study variations of protein accuracy in bacteria. One

got information from mutant bacteria where the accuracy could change; in particular, it

could increase. Then, one can influence the selection process by the antibiotics streptomycin,

which becomes attached at the ribosomes and then influences the selection of tRNA

and amino acid insertion at proper places of proteins.

The fact that normal bacteria keeps a particular selection accuracy, and that there are

mutants, which should be regarded as “less fitted”, seems to indicate that the “normal”

accuracy level is chosen according to some criteria as advantageous, such as optimising

some “cost” or time for producing functioning components, what was suggested above. As

should be expected according to the general principles, a higher accuracy also requires a

prolonged process time.

Streptomycin makes the selection worse, leading to a decrease of accuracy (Gorini,

1974; Rosenberger, 1982; Ruusala and Kurland, 1984.). There has sometimes been a misunderstanding

that the general theory would mean that this would imply a shorter process

time. However, a close look at the formalism above, how various rates influence the accuracy,

and what an optimised situation should look like, would show that there are no clear

relations between time and accuracy in a deteriorated, non-optimised selection process.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!