17.07.2020 Views

Clas Blomberg - Physics of life-Elsevier Science (2007)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 33. Origin of life 373

loops, where, for instance, polymer ‘1’ catalyses the production of polymer ‘2’, which in

turn catalyses the production of polymer ‘3’. The last one can then catalyse the production

of a fourth and so on, eventually leading to one that catalyses the production of the first one.

Such schemes have been much studied in different frameworks, primarily (Eigen et al.

(1980). There is a scheme:

X ( cat) X ( temp) →X 2X

;

X ( cat) X ( temp)

→X 2X

X

1 2 1 2

2 3 2 3

n

( cat)

X1( temp)

→Xn 2 X1

We distinguish the components in the reactions that serve as catalysts and those that serve

as templates. We assume the same rate constants for all of the different catalytic reactions,

and we get equations:

dX

dt

dX

dt

dX

dt

dX

dt

1

2

3

n

kMX X

n

kMX X

kMX X

kMX

gX

1 1

gX

1 2 2

gX

2 3 3

X

gX

n1

n n

(33.21)

To this, there is an equation for M of the same type as previously. There is a stationary solution

with all X-concentrations equal, which is stable only up to three components (n 3).

With n larger than 3, the components will oscillate, and this can be rather drastic for a large

number of components. The oscillations appear in the following manner.

Start with a situation where component ‘n’ is relatively large but decreasing. As long as

it is above a certain threshold value, component ‘1’ increases. As ‘1’ then becomes large,

component ‘2’ increases, although it at first is not large enough for ‘3’ to increase. As component

‘n’decreases further, ‘1’will reach a maximum and then decrease. Component ‘2’will

still increase at that stage, and when it passes a threshold, also ‘3’ increases. As ‘1’ no longer

gets sufficient catalytic support from ‘n’, it goes down. ‘2’ will turn while ‘3’ still increases

and the next component ‘4’ is on its way up. And so on. In the decreasing intervals, the

components may go down very far when there are many components. The minima are

roughly 2 orders of magnitude lower for each further component in the scheme. (Although

the general features are the same in alternative schemes, details may vary.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!