Comparison of the TDCR method and the CIEMAT/NIST method for ...
Comparison of the TDCR method and the CIEMAT/NIST method for ...
Comparison of the TDCR method and the CIEMAT/NIST method for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>TDCR</strong> <strong>method</strong> (3 PMTs):<br />
ε<br />
ε<br />
D<br />
=<br />
E<br />
max<br />
T ∫<br />
0<br />
E<br />
max<br />
= ∫ S(<br />
E)<br />
3((<br />
1−<br />
e<br />
0<br />
S(<br />
E)(<br />
1−<br />
e<br />
Free parameter model<br />
−EQ(<br />
E)<br />
/ 3M<br />
)<br />
−EQ(<br />
E)<br />
/ 3M<br />
2(<br />
1<br />
− e<br />
−EQ(<br />
E)<br />
/ 3M<br />
) dE<br />
The free parameter is derived from <strong>the</strong> ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> experimental<br />
counting rates<br />
3<br />
dE<br />
O. Nähle <strong>and</strong> K. Kossert <strong>Comparison</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>TDCR</strong> <strong>and</strong> CN <strong>for</strong> β emitters<br />
)<br />
2<br />
−<br />
RT<br />
εT<br />
<strong>TDCR</strong> = =<br />
R ε<br />
D D<br />
)<br />
3
Change language