XII Young Painter Prize Book
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PATRONS:<br />
Dali van Rooij Rakutyte,<br />
Mindaugas Raila,<br />
Nicolas Ortiz family,<br />
The Bajorunas/Sarnoff Foundation<br />
SPONSORS:<br />
www.ypp.lt<br />
© 2020<br />
Editor: Julija Dailidėnaitė / www.palmeirao.art<br />
Translation: Igne Stewart and Malcolm Stewart<br />
Design: Toma Brundzaitė / www.brunto.lt<br />
YPP organizer: VšĮ Šiuolaikiniai meno projektai
08<br />
<strong>XII</strong> YPP Jury<br />
CONTENT<br />
18<br />
Where does painting stand today?<br />
16<br />
The winner<br />
takes it all
38<br />
Contemporary painting as a creator<br />
of insights about the world<br />
66<br />
<strong>XII</strong> YPP Winner<br />
54<br />
Finalist<br />
88<br />
Participants
6<br />
J U R Y :<br />
Jean-Max Colard -<br />
an art critic, exhibition curator and literary scholar. He’s<br />
actually working at The Centre Pompidou as head of the Talk<br />
Program and as responsible for the new online Centre Pompidou’s<br />
school. Since 2004 he curated numerous exhibitions, including<br />
“Duras Song” (Centre Pompidou, 2015), or « Seoul, vite, vite », a large<br />
show about the new korean art scene (Lille, 2015).<br />
Jean-Max Colard was the chief editor of the arts page of the French<br />
magazine “Les Inrockuptibles” (from 1997 to 2017). Also he was the<br />
co-artistic director of Christian Bernard for Le Printemps de<br />
septembre à Toulouse in 2008 and 2009. In 2005 with “Offshore”<br />
Jean-Max Colard curated the Fondation Ricard <strong>Prize</strong> in 2005.<br />
Jean-Max Colard organized the pluridisciplinary event « Extra ! » at<br />
the Centre Pompidou, devoted to literature beyond the book, and<br />
created the first literary <strong>Prize</strong> of the Centre Pompidou. This Festival is<br />
at the crossroads of literature and contemporary art and is<br />
interested in all the forms that literary creation takes today: readings,<br />
performances, exposed literature, visual or digital, sound poetry,<br />
public meetings.
10
J U R Y :<br />
Jānis Avotiņš -<br />
a Latvian painter, a tutor and lecturer, the receipient of the Prix<br />
Jean-François Prat in 2016. He has been featured in private and<br />
public collections around the world including Rubell Family<br />
Collection; Cranford Collection; Hort Family Collection; François<br />
Pinault Collection; Fondazione Sandretto Re Rebaudengo and<br />
The Federal Republic of Germany Contemporary Art Collection.<br />
The Artist has gained inspiration and motifs for his work in the<br />
visual legacy of the recent past, including photographs found in state<br />
and private archives, retouched Soviet-era press illustrations and city<br />
guidebooks. Avotiņš delves into this cultural and historical legacy not<br />
only for building blocks for his creative output but acts as a<br />
careful archeologist, attempting to free his paintings and drawings<br />
from unnecessary semantic layers, often erasing indications that<br />
would place his figures in a specific time frame. The artist moves<br />
images of the past to a different universe, a dimension of time<br />
characteristic only of a work of art, the ’now’ of art.
10<br />
J U R Y :<br />
Lina Lapelytė -<br />
an artist living and working in London and Vilnius. In 2019 Lina earned<br />
Lithuanian National Culture and Art <strong>Prize</strong> and Venice Art Biennale<br />
“Golden Lion” for the opera-performance “Sun and Sea (Marina)”<br />
(Together with Rugile Barzdžiukaitė and Vaiva Grainyte).<br />
Lapelytė’s performance Candy shop – the Circus was shown at the<br />
FIAC (Paris, 2017) and Barcelona Museum of Contemporary Art,<br />
Barcelona. Other shows and performances include: 1857, Oslo (2017),<br />
Kunstraum, London (2017); Venice architecture Biennial, Venice<br />
(2016); CAC, Vilnius (2016), Focal Point Gallery, UK (2016), Nylo,<br />
Reykjavik (2016), Hayward Gallery Touring, UK (2015); Block<br />
Universe, London (2015); Serpentine Galleries, London (2014);<br />
Baltic Center for Contemporary Art, Newcastle (2014); David Roberts<br />
Art Foundation, London (2014/2017); Queen Elizabeth Hall, London<br />
(2014). In 2018 her works will be presented at the Baltic Triennial,<br />
curated by Vincent Honnoré.
J U R Y :<br />
Liina Raus -<br />
organic and bioorganic chemist, former textile conservator of<br />
Estonian National Museum textile collection, art enthusiast, explorer,<br />
curator, art collector, gallerist, the co-founder and manager of Kogo<br />
gallery - a contemporary art gallery representing outstanding<br />
emerging and mid-career Estonian and international artists of<br />
all media. Since its establishment in spring 2018, it has been Kogo’s<br />
aim to help the artists with their international visibility, to introduce<br />
their artistic practices as widely as possible and to create and<br />
maintain professional contacts with art aficionados and<br />
community of collectors.<br />
As a chemist previously worked in connection with the<br />
pharmaceutical industry, Liina Raus is convinced that art is a great<br />
mind stimulator, a drug with little side effects.
14<br />
J U R Y :<br />
Vilmantas Marcinkevičius -<br />
a Lithuanian painter, initiator of international competition for young<br />
artists - <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong>, art collector. His artistic style was shaped<br />
while studying at Vilnius Academy of Arts during the collapse of the<br />
Soviet Union. After finishing his studies, the artist and his works were<br />
soon noticed by art collectors from Denmark. Thanks to NB Galleri<br />
galerist Thorkild Nielsen who is exhibiting his paintings in Scandinavia<br />
more than 20 years, nowadays, his artworks are amongst<br />
the tops of the Northern Europe art market. In 2019 he earned<br />
Lithuanian Art Creator Association award for the <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong><br />
(together with colleague Julija Dailidėnaitė), in 2009 he won online<br />
Showdown competition run by the Saatchi Gallery, were was<br />
displayed his painting “Madonna of the 21st Century”. His numerous<br />
exhibitions in Europe, Asia and US, prizes and commissions bear<br />
witness of an artist who is living a really active artistic life.<br />
Artworks of Vilmantas astonish: spontaneous power of gesture, huge<br />
sizes of canvases, impudent colors, ironical and insolent themes, vivid<br />
colors expressionally flow, splash, spurt, wander and cover the<br />
canvas. He has been featured in private and public collections around<br />
the world including The Danish Royal Family Collection, Lithuanian<br />
National Gallery, Mo museum, Lewben Art Foundation.
16<br />
The Winner Takes It All<br />
Song by Abba (1980)<br />
*
The 12th winner of the <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong><br />
will be announced on the 13th of November<br />
at the “Pakrante” gallery in Vilnius. In<br />
the run-up to one of the most important<br />
painting events of the year in the Baltics,<br />
we asked Latvian art critic and curator<br />
Šelda Puķīte to share her thoughts on the<br />
contemporary art scene and the situation<br />
for the young artists in it. Painting has<br />
been buried then revived many times over<br />
the last few decades, but now we can see<br />
that the medium is once more in ascent.<br />
Where Does Painting Stand Today?<br />
Text by curator and critic Šelda Puķīte
18<br />
Where Does Painting<br />
Stand Today?<br />
“Today, painting has overcome its historical<br />
“burden” to be the “archetype” of art,<br />
and has become “only” a medium, which<br />
is neither better nor worse than others.” 1<br />
This seemingly liberating conclusion was<br />
penned in an essay by the Latvian art<br />
historian Ieva Astahovska that was published<br />
in the catalog of the very first major<br />
art show of 21st century dedicated to the<br />
newest shape-shifters of the medium of<br />
painting in Latvia. The exhibition, “Candy<br />
Bomber: <strong>Young</strong> Latvian <strong>Painter</strong>s”, which<br />
took place in Latvian National Museum<br />
of Art exhibition hall Arsenāls in 2007,<br />
signalled that following the popularity of<br />
installations and photography in 90’s and<br />
early 00’s, the medium of painting had<br />
regained the attention of the younger<br />
generation of artists. The show went on to<br />
have two more iterations. The first in 2010<br />
(Urbanchildren: <strong>Young</strong> Latvian <strong>Painter</strong>s)<br />
still pretty much echoed the first exhibition,<br />
while a second in 2016 (“Tension. <strong>Young</strong><br />
<strong>Painter</strong>s in Latvia”) already began to show<br />
signs that young artists were thinking<br />
about what painting is and how it can be<br />
used. But what did this liberation of painting<br />
really mean, and where does it<br />
really stand today in the pluralism of the<br />
art world?<br />
I’m not sure how fruitful it is to touch upon<br />
the topic of the several “deaths” and<br />
“rebirths” of painting that has been circulating<br />
in the minds and writings of art<br />
professionals and thinkers for almost two<br />
centuries now. Following the last “renaissance”<br />
of painting at the beginning of<br />
21st century this “death bell ring tone”
seemed to have quieted down. Still, it<br />
tends to sneak in between the lines of critical<br />
texts every time an important contemporary<br />
art show presents a decent<br />
amount of paintings. It is as if it were some<br />
sort of miracle similar to the biblical awakening<br />
of Lazarus. The reason for this may<br />
not be attributable simply to the expectation<br />
of painting’s timely demise, but more<br />
to the fact that contemporary art shows<br />
more often privilege photography, video<br />
and installation. These different alternative<br />
forms of media have replaced painting’s<br />
function to represent the visible world and<br />
to connect more with modern society.<br />
whom such an outcome is an issue. Then<br />
there is the contemporary art scene which<br />
snubs painters as professionals belonging<br />
to the old world, meaning that artists have<br />
to catch the zeitgeist by the tail to remain<br />
relative. The ironic moment in all of this is<br />
that if the contemporary art world<br />
accepts the painter, the market quickly<br />
follows anyway as paintings sell well. So,<br />
the painter as the winner takes all.<br />
The French painter Paul Delaroche was<br />
the first to proclaim painting’s death in the<br />
first half of 19th century, spurred on by the<br />
invention of photography. But instead of<br />
thinking from the loser’s perspective, we<br />
can look upon these changes as a liberation<br />
of painting – allowing it to develop its<br />
own unique language and other qualities,<br />
free from specific function or obligation<br />
to the world. Even more, painting gets to<br />
retain what the philosopher Walter Benjamin<br />
called an “aura”. It can keep its status<br />
as an analog art form status instead of<br />
becoming a technically reproduced object,<br />
as well as its grand history and unshakable<br />
pole position in the art market. So,<br />
then what’s the problem? Well, it can unfortunately<br />
easily fall into the trap of commercialism<br />
and never get past the status<br />
of a luxury product or a design object.<br />
This, of course, applies to those artists for<br />
1 Astahovska, Ieva. Painting in the Age of Representation //<br />
Candy Bomber. <strong>Young</strong> Latvian <strong>Painter</strong>s. Compilers: Diāna<br />
Barčevska, Maija Rudovska. - Rīga: RJA “VERITAS”, 2007.<br />
- P.8.
20<br />
Everything Is Liquid,<br />
Everything Is Painting
One of the minds behind the world-famous<br />
Eames designs, Ray Eames, was<br />
herself a classically trained painter. She<br />
said that she never gave up painting, she<br />
just changed her pallet. Painting is not a<br />
strictly defined form; it can manifest itself<br />
as an artistic vision or worldview. It<br />
can be present in the way an artist uses<br />
color, artistic gestures, space, and even<br />
time. It can be a performative movement<br />
that incorporates painterly qualities - the<br />
aggressiveness or softness of the brush.<br />
There are definitely dozens of artists who<br />
work with sculpture, installations, performances,<br />
photo and video art who from my<br />
point of view are painters using different<br />
kind of canvas.<br />
Pop artists like Roy Lichtenstein took one<br />
of painting’s most important tools –the<br />
brushstroke - and transformed it into a<br />
mechanical, cold reproduction, or in other<br />
words created a gravestone for it. Now,<br />
apart from art that is strongly influenced<br />
by the presence of the internet, there are<br />
also certain forms that are reminiscent of<br />
modernism. The brush stroke has suddenly<br />
not just broken free from Lichtenstein’s flat<br />
image in all its juicy textures and liquidity,<br />
but it has also jumped out of the canvas<br />
and become a sculptural entity itself.<br />
The “fluidity” 2 we are experiencing now is<br />
not just connected with the fluid borderlines<br />
that exist between different art forms.<br />
It’s time itself that has triggered a different<br />
look at the world that hopefully won’t get<br />
jammed by political “earthquakes” and<br />
pandemics. Physical mobility and internet<br />
connections have changed the way we<br />
perceive our location, our connection with<br />
it, and travel. It has been popular for some<br />
time to revisit history, trying to decolonize<br />
and expand it by filling it with stories of<br />
different marginalized groups including<br />
woman, queer communities and different<br />
cultures and races. Archiving the ghosts<br />
of the past has also become an important<br />
part of the oeuvre of modern painters like<br />
Luc Tuyman, Marlene Dumas and Neo<br />
Rauch, all of whom blend their own personal<br />
micro histories into their works.<br />
A crucial source of liquidity is the influence<br />
of the internet, the streams and surfing<br />
opportunities it has provided, and the flows<br />
of images and information we have experienced.<br />
And then finally there is the post<br />
human movement which forces us to shift<br />
from our position of center and reconnect<br />
with other living things and the world as<br />
such. This idea about reconnecting and<br />
fluidity is very much present in the poetic<br />
texts of the essayist Astrida Neimanis,<br />
which are dedicated to the topic of hydrofeminism<br />
3 . Here she speaks of bodies being<br />
water which, connected in an imaginably<br />
tight yet fluid way, allow us to be<br />
free of dogmas and flow where we need<br />
to.<br />
2 I borrowed the term from sociologist and philosopher<br />
Zygmunt Bauman. He introduced late modernity as “liquid”<br />
modernity which is marked by the global capitalist economies<br />
and by the information revolution.<br />
3 Neimanis, Astrida. Bodies of Water. Posthuman Feminist<br />
Phenomenology. - Lodon: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.
22<br />
There is also social politics, of course.<br />
The younger generation is at this moment<br />
ready to be socially active and so is art.<br />
There are people that might disagree,<br />
but even if the artist creates abstracts or<br />
landscapes there is a certain layer that<br />
will always deliver some sort of political<br />
message. Apolitical art is an illusion.<br />
Paintings possess the potential to speak<br />
in very different layers. They can touch us<br />
almost unconsciously, and that’s where we<br />
come back again to the concept of fluidity.<br />
Unfortunately, the art world itself is both<br />
inclusive and exclusive. But there is hope.<br />
Taking into consideration the activism that<br />
is happening, the rewriting of history and<br />
the creation of a more inclusive society -<br />
it seems inevitable that this will affect art<br />
and the art market also. And indeed, we<br />
are already seeing greater numbers of females<br />
and a high proportion of multi-ethnic<br />
artists present.
The 2019 Venice Biennale showed us that<br />
there has been a shift in the representation<br />
of different genders, with the amount<br />
of women artists participating the largest<br />
in its long history (many of whom were<br />
painters). Liquidity has happened not just<br />
in art but also in other aspects of life, giving<br />
a main stage to those who have had<br />
a harder time to be noticed before. This<br />
has also effected an important shift in the<br />
way the world is represented through art.<br />
The gaze has changed, with the female<br />
gaining more dominance than ever before.<br />
From the Female<br />
Gaze To a Naked<br />
Man With White Socks<br />
Identity in one or another way has always<br />
been on the menu of art but now it seems<br />
to have become an even more important<br />
dish. The historical discoveries that have<br />
been actualized and represented have<br />
become an important encouragement to<br />
many. For example, the discovery of the<br />
first abstract painter Hilma af Klint, and<br />
now the big show of baroque painter Artemisia<br />
Gentileschi 4 all play an important<br />
role. The women’s history movement that<br />
started in 70’s has now become a true<br />
powerhouse, thanks to the undertakings of<br />
influential institutions. Hopefully this movement<br />
won’t be hushed by the conservative<br />
section of society - to which a large<br />
number of historians unfortunately belong.<br />
It seems that the stigma amongst women<br />
that painting represents the patriarchy is<br />
also not so present anymore.<br />
4 Exhibition “Artemisia” (3.10.2020-24.01.2021). The National<br />
Gallery, London.
24<br />
From the Baltic States I would like to<br />
highlight a few interesting artists that I<br />
would associate with painting. From Latvia<br />
we could list such internationally and<br />
commercially successful artists as Ēriks<br />
Apaļais, Jānis Avotiņš and Inga Meldere,<br />
but for me they represent the first generation<br />
of 21st century. Also, although they<br />
make use of interesting approaches like<br />
working with archives, memories and language<br />
transported into canvas, they still<br />
don’t seem to be “liquid” enough. Artists<br />
from the subsequent generation like Elīna<br />
Vītola and Amanda Ziemele are already<br />
showing a different approach. They both<br />
seemed to be starting from from more<br />
modernistic and abstract roots, injecting<br />
these stylistic points of departure with<br />
different topics that are socially relevant<br />
today.<br />
In Vītola’s case it has turned her works,<br />
which comment heavily on an art community,<br />
into an artistic factory which involves<br />
several other artists. The joint installation<br />
titled “Artist Crises Center” (2019) is a<br />
good example of her practice. I would also<br />
like to draw attention to the last artist<br />
who represented Latvia at the Venice<br />
Biennale - Daiga Grantiņa with her fleshy,<br />
liquid and baroque like sculptural installations<br />
which in my view are very painterly.<br />
From Estonia two names immediately<br />
come to my mind – Merike Estna and<br />
Kristi Kogi. Both create semi abstract work<br />
using bright colors, often allowing their<br />
paintings to transform by placing them in<br />
murals or spatial installations. In Estna’s<br />
case, we can also talk about the elements<br />
of mysticism, symbolism and even shamanism<br />
that are present in her work, and<br />
that leads me to another Estonian artist<br />
Kris Lemsalu. Her rainbow colored, symbolic<br />
and expressive sculptures, installations<br />
and performances are like paintings<br />
that have exploded, and from which the<br />
characters have crawled out to then begin<br />
their own ritual dance or circus performance.<br />
My knowledge of the Lithuanian scene is<br />
unfortunately much poorer than I would<br />
like to admit. I of course know the strong<br />
tradition of expressionism that I guess is<br />
still present in many artists’ works though<br />
maybe in a more subtle, dream like way.<br />
The previously mentioned Elīna Vītola very<br />
much likes to comment on the contemporary<br />
art world she her-self is part of,<br />
and the same is true of the Estonian artist<br />
Alexei Gordin, although there is a stronger<br />
narrative element in his work. I guess in<br />
the Lithuania case a solid example could<br />
be Egle Karpaviciute. A younger generation<br />
artist whose painting I really liked from<br />
previous the <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong> short list<br />
exhibition was Raminta Blazeviciute. Her<br />
works follow the above mentioned tradition,<br />
although this is mixed together with<br />
surrealism and a low brow street vibe<br />
which makes them very current. Looking<br />
from more looser perspectives I would like<br />
to include in this list the artistic duo Pakui<br />
Hardware. Their work, which synthesizes<br />
materials and forms that seem to physically<br />
manifest the hydro-feminism ideas,<br />
are a pure example of what is painterly<br />
today, not to mention the concept of the<br />
liquid modernity.<br />
A similar exciting change has been performed<br />
by artists who are shifting away<br />
from the tradition of the western art history
canon, or who have been mixing it with<br />
their own unique heritage which is not<br />
part of western culture. There are predictions<br />
both from scholars and curators<br />
alike that the exciting works made now<br />
that are being exhibited in many major art<br />
festivals and museums might become the<br />
new benchmark and inspiration for European<br />
artists in the future. But where in all<br />
this does the white male artist stand? We<br />
can say that in the same social fluidity as<br />
the rest of the world. At the same time this<br />
confusion of identity in 21st century masculinity,<br />
mixed with the magical thinking<br />
that has blossomed in last decade, is very<br />
nicely presented by the work of the British<br />
artist Glen Pudvine. His confrontational<br />
work has been described as the potential<br />
death of art. Pudvine’s surreal paintings<br />
are self-portraits as nudes in which he<br />
is only wearing white socks. His figure is<br />
positioned in strange, fantastic yet disturbing<br />
landscapes in which he has a monster<br />
as a partner. They remind one of the<br />
aesthetics and fantasies of the old Dutch<br />
master Hieronymus Bosch mixed with the<br />
new selfie culture. As the artists explained<br />
to Elephant magazine, “The self-portrait<br />
originally felt like a way of exposing my<br />
total ‘normal-ness’. I didn’t have anything<br />
to bring to the table.” 5<br />
5 Link: https://elephant.art/ones-to-watch-the-rising-artstars-of-2020/
Kristi Kongi<br />
“Mapping the Jungle” at Karen Huber Gallery, Mexico City, Mexico. 2018
Pakui Hardware. “Underbelly” at MdbK Leipzig, Leipzig, 2019-2020<br />
Eglė Karpavičiūtė. The Portrait of Damien HIRST. 60x80, oil on canvas. 2012
Raminta Blaževičiūtė artwork in the XI <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong> exhibition, 2019
Glen Pudvine.”Born” 186x156cm, oil on canvas. 2019
Alexei Gordin.<br />
“Periphery” 80x70cm, acrylic on canvas. 2018<br />
Courtesy of the artist and Kogo gallery.
34<br />
If we distance ourselves from our present<br />
lock down situation arising from the<br />
worldwide pandemic, we can say that this<br />
is a marvelous time for young artists. The<br />
mobility options using different support<br />
programs for young artists, as well as residencies<br />
and schools, are almost unlimited.<br />
But there is a catch. An artist needs to be<br />
elastic, mobile, and always looking fresh<br />
and current. There is also constant instability.<br />
Nothing is stable, nothing is reassuring.<br />
Looking from this perspective, we can<br />
say that flexibility and youthfulness and<br />
also a drop of pure luck is an important<br />
part of the survivalist strategy.<br />
Survival Strategies<br />
For <strong>Young</strong> Artists<br />
In the Baltic States, scholarships are<br />
formed of both public, as well as private<br />
sector funds. The largest support programs<br />
are for students or recent school graduates.<br />
We can all together say that artists<br />
under 35 years have the most opportunities.<br />
The only necessary criteria, besides<br />
ideas and creativity, is to be active. In<br />
most cases, taking the initiative and not<br />
waiting for curators to discover them or<br />
the schools to push them is central, although<br />
schools and curators still provide<br />
very crucial support for young and establishes<br />
artists. Institutional power is still very<br />
important, but there are also virtual<br />
platforms, which are another tool that<br />
should not be overlooked. Then there are<br />
prizes as well, which should not be taken<br />
too seriously as an obligatory standard for<br />
success. But such prizes do provide artists<br />
with an important opportunity to win<br />
much needed funding to work. They also<br />
give them the opportunity to show works<br />
to expert jury members who might want to<br />
collaborate in future, and then there is the<br />
media coverage and the chance to make
exhibitions in different galleries and participate<br />
in important residencies.<br />
An interesting separate topic is residencies.<br />
Some artists use them so extensively<br />
that they acquire the nickname of “residency<br />
junkies”. However, it would appear<br />
that nowadays, aside from the opportunity<br />
to study art at schools around the world,<br />
or register for popular online courses, residencies<br />
are an important exchange tool.<br />
They provide artist with the possibility to<br />
experience different geographical locations,<br />
landscapes and cultures and also<br />
network, which is crucial these days if an<br />
artist is looking for future collaborations.<br />
But at some point, it can begin to feel<br />
that the art is not as important as all of<br />
its institutional accoutrements and this is<br />
something young artists should be always<br />
careful of. Doing everything by the book<br />
can get you trapped in the art system<br />
and market, and you might lose your own<br />
“voice”.<br />
“Success means that people are buying<br />
your works and are hanging them above<br />
their sofas on the wall”. This is how success<br />
was explained by Elīna Vītola, the<br />
winner of The Nordic & Baltic <strong>Young</strong> Artist<br />
Award’18, whose installation consisted of<br />
a 20 m long painted scroll and sofa. This<br />
statement first of all suggests that success<br />
is connected with integration into the art<br />
market. Secondly, for integration to happen,<br />
art needs to possess decorative functionality<br />
or trophy like qualities. The artist<br />
did not invent this statement, but consciously<br />
borrowed it from the conservative<br />
teachers of Art Academy of Latvia, who<br />
introduced this idea to their students. Artists<br />
are constantly put in situations where<br />
they need to strike a balance between<br />
their personal desires, survival and goals to<br />
reach authenticity.<br />
In his public lecture series about artistic<br />
success, the British artist Grayson Perry<br />
regaled the audience in his usual tongue<br />
in cheek manner with answers the general<br />
public gave to a questionnaire about art.<br />
The results showed that apparently most<br />
people prefer blue colored paintings and<br />
landscapes with cows. It may seem kind<br />
of ridiculous to follow this formula, but<br />
artist themselves often blindly follow the<br />
Western artistic canon. In the end this is<br />
equivalent to the blue landscape with cow<br />
situation. There are things (some of which<br />
I mentioned in this essay) that can bring<br />
you closer to some success, and there are<br />
different support systems that have been<br />
invented as well. But before doing something<br />
important, the artist must first envision<br />
what exactly the goal of an artist is.<br />
When this envisioning is complete, artist<br />
needs to keep an open, curious and flexible<br />
mind because the world is in a constant<br />
state of flux.
Elīna Vītola. “Artist Crises Center” at gallery Low, Riga, Latvia, 2019. Photo by Līga Spunde
Contemporary Painting<br />
as a Creator of Insights<br />
about the World
Text by art critic Viltė Visockaitė<br />
The question still remains: how to understand<br />
and explain contemporary art? Of<br />
course, you can feel it, although for an art<br />
critic that’s probably not enough. That is<br />
why this question is relevant not only for<br />
spectators and artists but also for professionals<br />
in my field – intermediaries between<br />
the work and the audience. In this<br />
text, I will attempt to unravel the knot of<br />
contemporary art by touching on the very<br />
era in which we live, the relationship of the<br />
work to the context, and the collaboration<br />
between artist and curator – and by doing<br />
so discovering at least part of the answer<br />
to the question raised.
40<br />
Viscous Present<br />
My intense attendance of exhibitions in<br />
recent years has drawn a map in my mind<br />
which unfolds lifelike paradoxes and the<br />
(un)truths of the modern world. Contemporary<br />
art draws us into its enchanting<br />
narratives of the present, increasingly<br />
moving us away from the comprehension<br />
of the whole. Therefore, modernity, or the<br />
present, is one of the categories that enable<br />
us to talk about contemporary art.<br />
Peter Osborn describes modernity as a<br />
useful product of the imagination that links<br />
global, unrelated contemporary stories.<br />
Boris Groys, meanwhile, argues that modernism<br />
sought to bypass the present by<br />
shaping the future. Modernity, conversely,<br />
is understood as an eternal procrastination<br />
1 . Doubt, uncertainty and indecision are<br />
the hallmarks of the modern state – procrastination<br />
creates more time for reflection<br />
and deliberation. The present is not a<br />
transition from the past to the future, because<br />
the future and the past are consstantly<br />
being rewritten 2 .<br />
In this context, St. Augustine’s famous<br />
conception on time becomes of especial<br />
importance. He argues that there are<br />
three times: a present of things past, a<br />
present of things present, and a present of<br />
things future. He explains that the present<br />
of things past represents memory, the<br />
present of this present is sight, while the<br />
present of things future is expectation 3 . A<br />
similar concept of phenomenological time<br />
was developed by Edmund Husserl who<br />
distinguished the chronological perception<br />
of time from temporality – the time of<br />
consciousness. Temporality manifests itself<br />
in the way that the present is affected by<br />
both the future and the past. The phenomenon<br />
itself consists of the initial im
pression, its projection into the near future,<br />
and the retention of the initial impression.<br />
We can observe that in the context of modernity,<br />
both the past and the future acquire<br />
meaning in the present. As Kristupas<br />
Sabolius observes, “in today’s art world a<br />
common element of uncertainty reveals<br />
both the impossibility of a homogeneous<br />
present and the postulation of the asynchrony<br />
of its different temporalities, while<br />
at the same time raising the problem of<br />
the nature of time itself” 4 .<br />
Let us recall the work of Andrius Zakarauskas<br />
– the first winner of the “<strong>Young</strong><br />
<strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong>”. The issues of painting as<br />
a medium, painting as a gesture (paint,<br />
its application, bright stroke) and the author-artist’s<br />
self-representation (at the<br />
beginning of his career the artist often depicted<br />
his image on canvas) are important<br />
in his work. Since 2016 the artist’s paintings<br />
have displayed a new plastic expression<br />
that is characterised by an excess<br />
paint, splashing, pouring and embossing.<br />
The latter aspects are also reflected in<br />
the titles of his recent paintings, where the<br />
word “stroke” is dominant (visible stroke,<br />
larger stroke, third wave stroke, lip stroke,<br />
caring stroke, pleasant stroke, etc.). Time<br />
is one of the tools that allow us to interpret<br />
the materiality of colour in Zakarauskas’<br />
oeuvre. Such paintings as Lipstroke (2017)<br />
or Skinstroke (2016) function as an outline<br />
of a painting itself: a visible process, the<br />
traces of time, and behind-the-scenes<br />
creation – with the relief of the painting<br />
becoming equated with the stroke itself.<br />
The moment of the painter’s touch on the<br />
canvas is captured: the tactility of the<br />
work opens the viewer to the viewer, highlighting<br />
the elements of corporeality and<br />
ephemerality. The moment of the painter’s<br />
touch on the canvas is captured: the<br />
tactility of the work takes the gaze of the<br />
viewer to the past, highlighting the elements<br />
of corporeality and ephemerality.<br />
1 Claire Bishop, Radical Museology, London: Dan Perjovschi<br />
and Koenig <strong>Book</strong>s, 2013, p. 18.<br />
2 Boris Groys, „Comrades of Time”, in: E-flux journal, 2009,<br />
Nr. 1, http://www.e-flux.com/journal/11/.<br />
3 Saint Augustine, Confessions, Vilnius: Aidai, 2004, p. 281.<br />
4 https://artnews.lt/isivaizduojant-laika-39561
42<br />
Andrius Zakarauskas<br />
Lipstroke. 50x40cm, oil on canvas, 2017
44<br />
Networked Painting<br />
Having discussed the widely researched<br />
phenomenon of modernity, let us move on<br />
to the work of art and its circulation within<br />
various contexts. David Joselit in his book,<br />
After Art (2013) explains how a work of art<br />
operates in the (non)art world. He refuses<br />
to create meaning for the work, which is<br />
customary for an art critic, instead arguing<br />
that the value of the work is revealed in<br />
its context and network of interfaces. An<br />
image can be closed, inaccessible and<br />
without any interfaces, or conversely, an<br />
open and accessible image that has the<br />
power to reach a huge audience. Consequently,<br />
the more widely one can relate<br />
the image to different themes or contexts,<br />
the more valuable and relevant it is. Networked<br />
interfaces create possible contexts<br />
for a work of art, while the art itself is in<br />
constant flux, changing through the ever<br />
emerging new relationships between the<br />
work and its perceiver, gallery, fair, biennial,<br />
etc. All works of art in circulation<br />
acquire meaningful and valuable content<br />
simply because they can be rotated and<br />
linked to different contexts.<br />
For example, an artist’s participation in a<br />
YPP competition is already the creation of<br />
one of the networks. YPP has been held<br />
since 2009 and gathers together young<br />
artists from Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.<br />
This means that information regarding this<br />
event reaches not only the local audience,<br />
but also other Baltic states; therefore, it<br />
has a positive effect on the Lithuanian<br />
art field, while the jury consists of famous<br />
representatives of this field from all over<br />
Europe. YPP becomes an apparatus that<br />
ensures the preparation of an exhibition<br />
catalogue, the opportunity for artists to<br />
participate in residencies, the ability to
eceive cash prizes and the organization<br />
of a personal exhibition. The work of the<br />
artist, having entered the YPP network,<br />
circulates in the field of art and thus accumulates<br />
symbolic capital.<br />
In addition to the interfaces between the<br />
work of art and the institutions, the state<br />
and the global stage, the viewer’s experience<br />
and transformation while observing<br />
an art work is also important. An<br />
experience is defined as a memorable<br />
event that engages the viewer personally.<br />
While transformation is the effective consequence<br />
of such an experience, which<br />
alters the person themself, i.e. influences<br />
thinking. Thus, art is able to create transformative<br />
experiences. Dorothea von<br />
Hantelmann also speaks about the shift<br />
of meaning towards the perceiver. She<br />
proposes that the work of art becomes the<br />
operator of the viewer’s relationship with<br />
themself and others 5 – meaning arises<br />
within experience. As society has shifted<br />
from materiality (a society of surplus) to<br />
an evaluation of experience, it is not surprising<br />
that this also applies to art.<br />
So how does painting belong to the network?<br />
As Joselit suggests, painting can<br />
visualise these networks. Thus the object<br />
of art encompasses several media, contexts<br />
and places. For example, in the Lux<br />
Interior (2009) exhibition, New York, Jutta<br />
Koether’s painting functioned as an installation,<br />
part of a performance, and a<br />
painted canvas. The painting Hot Rod<br />
(After Poussin) is a monochrome remake<br />
of Nicolas Poussin’s canvas Landscape<br />
with Pyramus and Thisbe (1651), in which<br />
the painting technique – hurried and inert<br />
– becomes of prime importance 6 and<br />
is used to mark the elapsed time between<br />
the paintings of Poussin and the artist herself.<br />
Moreover, the work was accompanied<br />
by three lecture-performances – with the<br />
painting thus becoming an artist’s interlocutor<br />
and a participant in the performance.<br />
The artist actualizes the operation of the<br />
object in the network: the canvas embodies<br />
the dimension of time and at the same<br />
time becomes a part of the performance.<br />
5 Dorothea von Hantelmann, „The Experiential Turn”, in: On<br />
Performativity, Living Collections Catalogue, 2014, t.1.<br />
6 David Joselit, „Painting Beside Itself”, in: October, 2009,<br />
Nr. 130, pp. 125-134.
Gintarė Konderauskaitė<br />
2020. 100x120cm, acrylic & oil on canvas, 2020
In this case, painting as a medium, painting<br />
as a social network, or painting as a<br />
relationship with the body opens up new<br />
opportunities for interpretation. Painting<br />
can become a point of intersection within<br />
installations, performances and other media.<br />
For example, in Gintarė Konderauskaitė’s<br />
work, one can spot “painting” with<br />
a finger – the painter makes a sketch on<br />
her phone and transfers the exact same<br />
image that is “painted” on the phone<br />
screen to the canvas. Thus, the traditional<br />
painting technique of oil painting and<br />
the digital drawing merge on the canvas.<br />
Meanwhile, the canvases by Elena Antanavičiūtė<br />
with their translucent layers create<br />
the volume of the body – the shades<br />
of soft grey, brown and pink contrast with<br />
the brightness of a body contour, as if<br />
saying although “hardly visible” – “I am”.<br />
The painter acquires corporeality through<br />
the thinness of the paint and its visible<br />
materiality, thus revealing the body’s relationship<br />
with time – skin pigmentation,<br />
stretch marks or wrinkles are layered over<br />
with oil paint. Therefore, the painting creates<br />
shapes and structures that enable the<br />
visualisation of the network, i.e. interfaces<br />
with digital images, the media itself or<br />
your own body.
48<br />
The <strong>Painter</strong> and<br />
Curator Union<br />
In this section, I would like to discuss the<br />
union of curators and artists that is taking<br />
root in the contemporary art market. Although<br />
art survived without a curator for<br />
5000 years, the 21st century curator – independent<br />
of the institution – has become<br />
a figure of particular importance in the<br />
modern art world. Harold Szeeman, one of<br />
the first independent curators, contributed<br />
to this by starting to organize exhibitions<br />
that did not reflect the objective canon of<br />
art history, but rather the individual gaze<br />
of the curator. Dorothea von Hantelmann<br />
observes that, like the artist, who from antiquity<br />
to the 18th century was considered<br />
a craftsman, only to later become viewed<br />
as a creative genius, so the curator, seeking<br />
a place in society, has moved from<br />
their position of service provider to become<br />
a creator of content and meaning 7 .<br />
According to Georgina Adam, the curator<br />
now has the tremendous power to decide<br />
which artists are significant and which are<br />
not. Furthermore, the curator’s conception<br />
sometimes undermines the artist’s work<br />
itself, which becomes an adjunct to the<br />
curator’s vision 8 .<br />
However, a curator, enveloped in the<br />
knowledge of art history, can establish<br />
the artist’s work in a contemporary context,<br />
reveal the strengths of the works and<br />
present it all to the public. In this light, it is<br />
worth mentioning several personal exhibitions<br />
of Lithuanian artists that were curated<br />
by art critics. First of all, I would like to<br />
draw attention to the creators of the middle<br />
generation – Laisvydė Šalčiūtė and<br />
Laima Kreivytė. Kreivytė, who had curated<br />
a few of Šalčiūtė’s exhibitions, in 2019<br />
invited to the space of the gallery “Left-<br />
Right”, with the gate to the Melusian
artist herself: “this cycle of works features<br />
the fictional antihero Meliuzina, whom I<br />
created myself, and who ironically and at<br />
the same time metaphorically talks about<br />
the social relations of our time, social<br />
status and anti-status to which she herself<br />
belongs; the theatrical mystifications of<br />
our consumer society and from it following<br />
tragicomic idiotism that is conditioned<br />
by the highest value of our consumer<br />
society – the pursuit of a “happy life”.<br />
”Although the works were first exhibited<br />
in the Palace of the Dukes of Mantua, the<br />
exhibition in the gallery was“ constructed<br />
as a localized ritual” with Kreivytė herself<br />
assuming a position more akin to an architect<br />
than a curator. In the exhibition,<br />
the viewer immerses themself in a pictorial<br />
oasis, starting with “the earthier, more<br />
mundane narration of splashes in the<br />
bath to a brighter hall with paintings<br />
containing recognisable paraphrases of<br />
the works of famous painters. Here, the<br />
Baroque is “barracked up”, the angels<br />
wear weapons, the toys, skulls and<br />
tattoos point to a secondary reality, or an<br />
otherworld, against which leans a white<br />
ladder” 9 . The viewer is intuitively led to<br />
the upper hall of the exhibition (not by<br />
chance), as if they were being elevated<br />
towards more universal themes relating to<br />
cosmogonic myth. In this way, the exhibition<br />
creates not only a narrative, but also<br />
a bodily experience of the concept that is<br />
formed by the architecture.<br />
7 Dorothea von Hantelmann, „The Curatorial Paradigm“, in:<br />
The Exhibitionist, 2011, Nr. 4, p. 6.<br />
8 Georgina Adam, Big Bucks: The Explosion of the Art<br />
Market in the 21st Century, London: Lund Humphries, 2014,<br />
pp. 90-92.<br />
9 https://literaturairmenas.lt/daile/meliuzina-veidrod-<br />
ziu-karalysteje?fbclid=IwAR3vpZQe4AOHOYYIrLHkIH-<br />
CVEP-wq_OcCBgt9AAGPXAbF1Yifv47z3MUQLA
50<br />
Laisvydė Šalčiūtė<br />
Būtinas angelas. 162x150cm, mixed technique, 2018
Monika Radžiūnaitė<br />
The exhibition “Hyperlink” fragment. 2020<br />
V. Nomadas photo
The exhibition “Hyperlink” (2020) at<br />
the gallery “Arka” put together by a duo<br />
from the younger generation – Monika<br />
Radžiūnaitė and Linas Bliškevičius – can<br />
be singled out as a counterweight to the<br />
art of the middle generation. By applying<br />
modern creative strategies, Radžiūnaitė<br />
revives the plots, symbols and iconography<br />
of medieval works of art. However,<br />
what has not been preserved by the written<br />
sources, the artist fills with the present<br />
and makes the images of the past<br />
relevant by passing them through a filter<br />
of ignorance or stupidity. In the exhibition,<br />
the artist’s works lurk in a darkened<br />
space in which small images have been<br />
stuck within various corners. The gallery’s<br />
precisely prepared walls respond to the<br />
thoroughness of the artist’s painting, while<br />
the works themselves are accompanied by<br />
texts selected by the curator – hyperlinks<br />
that create new connections and meanings.<br />
Both the artist’s work and curatorial<br />
solutions actualize the past, extend the<br />
present, and make online links the starting<br />
point of the exhibition. Consequently, by<br />
maintaining the balance of ideas between<br />
the painter and the curator, the exhibition<br />
becomes an organic art experience in<br />
which spaces, works, and narrative planes<br />
intertwine.<br />
***<br />
Contemporary art reflects on both current<br />
issues and the pulse of today, which<br />
we may not always be able to grasp. The<br />
artist, as if a mediator between us and<br />
time – visualises what at first glance might<br />
appear banal or boring – our everyday<br />
experiences, individual truths and sensations.<br />
The critical evaluation of an art work<br />
is possible only through interpretation – by<br />
analysing individual works and thus discovering<br />
new contours on the map of the<br />
modern world.
ADELĖ LIEPA KAUNAITĖ SONATA RIEPŠAITĖ DOMINYKAS<br />
MARTINA KRYŽEVIČIŪTĖ KAZIMIERAS BRAZDŽIŪNAS<br />
ALVĪNE BAUTRA KAUR MÄEPALU SAMANTA AUGUTĖ
SIDOROVAS DONATA MINDERYTĖ ELENA ANTANAVIČIŪTĖ<br />
LAURA AIZPORIETE JUSTĪNE SEILE-URTĀNE<br />
ELIJA GRYBYTĖ LĪGA KALNIŅA KADI REINTAMM
56<br />
Adelė Liepa Kaunaitė / LT<br />
City of silence.<br />
150x150cm, oil on canvas, 2020<br />
www.facebook.com/AdeleLiepa<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
There is so much spoken...speaking while disguising the truth and the silence which<br />
have turned into discomfort. LET’S RETURN THE SILENCE - cozy, tender and pure.<br />
To feel the comfort of silence. To be in silence together among people, to be in silence<br />
alone, not to speak, but to feel another human. To build a City of Silence. Listen to the<br />
wind, the fallen dew, which is awakened by the sun.<br />
In these paintings, I show my City of Silence.<br />
Let us be together and touch each other with words of silence.
58<br />
Alvīne Bautra / LV<br />
Fragile tension.<br />
130X150cm, oil on canvas, 2020<br />
www.alvinebautra.com<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Painting “Fragile tension” highlights the topic of adaptation process (physical and<br />
mental), which often is related with loss of comfort zone and, probably, creation of the<br />
new one. Adaptation is manipulation- intentional or unintentional. Adaptation provides<br />
(demands) figures’ (characters’) dynamic, relapse, variability. Painting “Fragile tension”<br />
is about losing control during adaptation process. It includes inner anxiety and external<br />
peace or other way around. I agree with British writer Ken Follett, who writes in one of<br />
his forewords of novel: “My aim was to portray individual freedoms’ inconspicuous<br />
submission to the stronger mechanism.” Whatever this “strongest mechanism” is.
60<br />
Dominykas Sidorovas / LT<br />
Attempting to get rid of Demons no. 2. The Morning Flag.<br />
120x200cm, oil on canvas, 2020<br />
www.galerijavartai.com/artists/33-dominykas-sidorovas/<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
The painting is part of a long-told story about things. The ambiguous motif of the old<br />
radio accommodates a sentimental state. It’s also a radio broadcasting the news and a<br />
waving flag announcing the morning. In the summerhouse, Grandfather used to turn on<br />
the radio every morning.<br />
In addition to sentimental and intimate states and stories, everyday objects contain<br />
many other signs of life. Our surroundings are full of things that are full of stories,<br />
dreams, losses, joy and sorrow. The main motif of my work is a casual object. The<br />
significance of things is revealed not only through their ambiguous contour or sign, but<br />
also through the sense of human existence. A part of me can be found in the object<br />
and that is why the motif attracts me.<br />
This metaphorical manifesto of things encourages attention to our everyday simple,<br />
sometimes even boring, environment. Interesting and unexpected marks can only be<br />
revealed by observing it. We have divided ourselves into various colourful items which<br />
can be found in a room, an attic or a garage.
62<br />
Donata Minderytė / LT<br />
Am I Normal? Kamile, 21 years old.<br />
180x210cm, oil on canvas, 2019<br />
www.artsy.net/artist/donata-minderyte/works-for-sale<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
In my work, I focus on what is to be avoided in language translation - moving away<br />
from the original, fading the initial meaning and changing the message - I implement<br />
these “mistakes” in painting. The equivalent of a word in another language does not<br />
always have a direct translation, has more than one meaning or simply has no equivalent<br />
in another language. Analyzing the image in different media, I notice similar things.<br />
In my work I often use still images from my daily life videos. Between the moment that is<br />
captured in the video, the memory of it, and the act of painting there is plenty of room<br />
for translation error to occur. The end result - finished painting - is always far-off from<br />
the accurate representation of the moment that it was inspired by.<br />
My paintings are based on the life stories of myself and the people around me. I am<br />
looking for a way to maintain a connection to a specific time period, preserve its authenticity<br />
and keep it real but at the same time I am fully aware how sentimental that<br />
might seem. I have painted many pictures with the same name: “Am I normal? Kamile,<br />
21 years old”. The starting point for these paintings is a 16-second video that I’ve<br />
watched way too many times in the last eight years, but to describe what’s happening<br />
in those sixteen seconds, I had to watch it again. I remember the moment on which this<br />
painting is based as a set of shapes, colors, light and shadow, but not as a sequence<br />
of images or continous moving image. That is because usually when I am looking for<br />
painting material I watch videos with no sound, I press pause and go through images<br />
ignoring the main video features: duration and timeline. I scroll through stills coldheartedly<br />
objectifying them as it had nothing to do with me.<br />
We are on the bus, sitting right in the middle, where the front and rear parts of the bus<br />
connects and folds like a harmonica. Kamile is wearing colorful vertical patterned shirt:<br />
white, blue, yellow, red. The chairs are blue. Kamile raises her eyebrows, glances to the<br />
right side and then turns to the camera:<br />
- A man is eating on a bus. I want to steal his food. Am I normal? Kamile, 21 years old.<br />
The camera turns to the man sitting a little further, he is chewing scrumptiously,<br />
scratching his ear and staring at the ceiling.
I remember that day as a cobalt blue that I associated with an air conditioner in a bus,<br />
vertical pattern of the shirt and folds in the background pops up into my memory as a<br />
barcode. In painting blue color can symbolise peace, eternity, holiness, perhaps blue<br />
can also be interpreted as a symbol of glory or divine. Kamiles face expression is unclear,<br />
frightened or anxious look in her eyes is combined with a slighty smiling mouth.<br />
Painting no longer says: Am I normal? Kamile, 21 years old“. Rather than documenting<br />
painting process is greatly increasing the distance from the past event, making it into<br />
something else. Image translation error occurs and a painting might become a generalized<br />
substitude of the past event but not it’s representation. In fact, neither the photograph<br />
nor the painting informs about a specific past event. The character of Kamile<br />
could be interpreted as a human factor that connects the painting with a specific period<br />
of time, but I do not bear nostalgia for the past through painting. The narrative of the<br />
past is replaced by a visual narrative, which relates to the state of the present / painting<br />
action more than anything else.
Donata Minderytė<br />
Am I Normal? Kamile, 21 years old.<br />
180x210cm, oil on canvas, 2019
66<br />
<strong>XII</strong> YPP<br />
PRIZE<br />
WINNER<br />
Elena Antanavičiūtė / LT<br />
Belly.<br />
100x95cm, oil on canvas, 2020<br />
www.instagram.com/elenaantanaviciute<br />
X I I Y P P P R I Z E W I N N E R<br />
I’m going to lie down on Sun & Sea: Marina beach, and of course I didn’t want to at<br />
first, I thought it would be enough to just watch, but I was persuaded. Among other<br />
volunteers, I meet an American and her kids who talks about how her kindergarten age<br />
children have been waiting for half a year to participate in this performance and how<br />
they (children) are interested and concerned about climate change (this part is not<br />
about my topic, just the context). It turns out that my swimsuit is the wrong color and<br />
I will have to put on one of those provided at the spot. Neverminded that I had verified<br />
with the organizers ahead of time that my swimsuit was acceptable! Wearing a<br />
swimsuit that is not mine seems like a nightmare to me. I choose a swimsuit that, in my<br />
painter’s eyes, is similar to my original bluish one that was rejected. However, I manage<br />
to avoid the deadly shame and fit into the aforementioned swimsuit. On the beach, I<br />
read the only book I picked up that I decided I should read because maybe something<br />
would be useful for my master’s and that I didn’t start reading until I came to the beach.<br />
The decisive criterion for choosing a book for a trip to Venice was its soft cover and<br />
how light it was. So, with somewhat mesmerizing, repetitive music in the background,<br />
I read Naomi Wolf’s The Beauty Myth and try to keep parts of my body from falling<br />
out of the swimsuit. I am pretty sure that the music of this opera in my head will always<br />
be associated with the book I read and the unfortunate swimsuit. The book says that<br />
unattainable beauty standards are used against women, and I am currently struggling<br />
with the unfortunate swimsuit. In the meantime, another volunteer from Italy (whose suit<br />
color didn’t meet the requirements, but she probably didn’t think it was a big tragedy,<br />
maybe?) invites me to play badminton, or rather to go and hit a shuttlecock because<br />
most likely neither one of us knows the rules of badminton. Although there is no wind, I<br />
am not doing very well, maybe because I am fighting against the ill-fitted swimsuit, my<br />
body, or maybe because I have not held a racket for a long time. Thus, this is a story<br />
that involves the body and feminist literature, and it is taking place against an artistic<br />
background.
68<br />
Elija Grybytė / LT<br />
Underwater Breaking necks.<br />
90x120cm, oil & spray paint on canvas, 2020<br />
www.elijagrybe.com<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Elija’s paintings use brutal images from MMA fights and wrestling matches to help<br />
articulate self-assertion and dignity in abuse survival. The artworks open conversations<br />
about violence and show, gender identity, masculinity, and control over one’s own body<br />
in the Digital age.<br />
Painting ‘Underwater Breaking Necks’ is a work from the series Parasite Paintings exploring<br />
Bodily disconnection in the Digital age. It creates a violent sensation of being a<br />
parasite inside one’s own body. Tapeworm imagery collaged with a distorted organic<br />
shape emphasizes the sensation of losing control. The digital invasion of information<br />
acts as a parasitic microorganism formed to give up its own liberty for the safety of the<br />
flesh. The brightly coloured, fleshy figures express emotional and physical violence, while<br />
more graphic, flat areas of the canvas show the aesthetics of the Digital age. This contrasting<br />
visual effect explores the disorienting feeling of Gender Dysphoria, especially in<br />
the Digital age, where bodies can become a digital spectacle.<br />
The fleshy figures in the painting are inspired by an image taken from a wrestling scene.<br />
There is a certain curiosity about photos of wrestling and fighting. Images of violence<br />
on digital media, controlled and mimicked fights all have a certain oddness to it. As a<br />
sexual abuse survivor, fighting helped the Elija take control over their body by giving the<br />
frames to train and explore the brutality of it. Competitive fight reflects the violent human<br />
condition and the ability to play by the rules.
70<br />
Justīne Seile-Urtāne / LV<br />
Night shift.<br />
130x120cm, oil on canvas, 2020<br />
www.facebook.com/justineseileart<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Dirrect glances, strange conversations, weird men, histerical groups of girls. Nights<br />
have merged togethet as one foggy dream. Weaks have turned in months. which day<br />
is today, I couldn’t tell, I’m inbetween worlds somewhere in dream somewhere between<br />
strangers who whants to know what is sad girl thinking about.<br />
My body is shiftin trought colorful darkness. sleeples nights, intoxicating days. Somewhere<br />
between classical and pop. Fake smiles, fake bodies, fake dreams. I queation my<br />
reality and my values in the dark, dark night with my eyes wide open. I am here in my<br />
bubble I am where they don’t want me to be.<br />
Do I know who I am, who am I? I’m a daughter a sister and a wife. I am a bartender<br />
and a student, I’m a cleaning lady in office building near by, I’m a dreamer. As I look in<br />
my own reflection in the the window next to me I see a strong woman.
72<br />
Kadi Reintamm / EE<br />
Prison in three layers.<br />
130x163cm, watercolor on paper, 2020<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Past years I have worked with organizing my personal chaos throught my art practice.<br />
I Have been working with topics like boredom, loneliness, depressioon and inequality<br />
in sociaty even before the crisis in spring brought all these issues into daylight, making<br />
them more relevant than ever as isolation was amplifying the feeling of helplessness<br />
through repetition.<br />
Series of watercolors, which I started in 2019, is called I must cope with it, the sizes of<br />
the watercolors vary from small (31x23cm) representing a personal sphere and going<br />
big (~130cmx160cm) the more general they are, representing the walls we build as<br />
a person, but also overall the fragmentation of the sociaty through decreased sense<br />
of community. In these series I started working on different personal topics like mental<br />
health, ADHD, social oppression, poverty and of course the time lacking and nerve<br />
wracking survival in the City isolation with kids. I was unable to solve all the problems in<br />
our family and work life, so I was left with endless feeling of “I am not enough”.<br />
Members of a privileged society had the opportunity to gain benefit of so called free<br />
time, but families with children were left with an impossible compromize between work<br />
and family duties. Especially vunerable are poor families, unemployed and women who<br />
have totake care of the elderly and multiple children. So I started questioning inequality<br />
in the society, as I was feeling deprived and therefore totally hopless. Deprived are the<br />
ones who have lost something, that others have, but in the lack of opportunities have<br />
difficulties managing the problem they have to deal with. In the times of crisis we need<br />
all the help we could get, but if there you have no community to depend on you start<br />
to sink very quick. Feeling the absurdity of the situation, when on the one hand I was<br />
driven by maternal empathy and a sense of duty, on the other hand by a feminist in me<br />
wishing to fight all inequality, I found myself increasingly dreaming of an utopian equal<br />
society.
74<br />
Kaur Mäepalu / EE<br />
Geometric Space I.<br />
130x250cm, airbrush & aerosol pray on canvas, 2020<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
At the moment I am working on constructing different spaces where on the highest level<br />
of importantance stand composition, rythm, colour and form. I try to manipulate with the<br />
viewer’s senses, which makes them wander around or instead find the nearest exit from<br />
the world I have created. The spaces and situations portrayed should confuse the<br />
viewer. I create new situations rather than repeat the already existing.<br />
„Geometric Space I“ focuses on the room surrounding us and distorting different objects<br />
I have combined with my inner world or space which is mainly the cause of the impulse.<br />
Two constructed figures step-by-step create the world surrounding them, me just being<br />
the medium supplying them with variations of colours and shapes. In cooperation the<br />
decisions are easier to make. The detailed linework indicates the systematical thought<br />
process of the figures.
76<br />
Kazimieras Brazdžiūnas / LT<br />
RUDD.<br />
210x180cm, printing ink & aerosol spray on canvas, 2020<br />
www.instagram.com/kminimaliai<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Tired of the flow of visual information and having experimented with various techniques<br />
in painting, I came to the conclusion that there is no place for me in conventional<br />
painting. I understood that when I acknowledged my habit of colouring, painting, questioning<br />
and contradicting myself without finding a coherent creative course, since certain<br />
influences and my own stubbornness put me in a certain airtight state and did<br />
not result in what I expected. As I mentioned before, I still tend to stick to the “painter”<br />
label. Still, as an artist who works with aerosol paint, when explaining my creative path,<br />
I must refine some of the fundamental values that would acquaint the viewer with the<br />
current situation on my path.<br />
The choice of aerosol paint came logically and naturally due to its quick and effective<br />
performance and direct reference to graffiti, the beginnings of which can be traced<br />
back to ancient Egypt. Modern graffiti, which originated in the 1970s in the United<br />
States as a form of protest, vandalism, or simply perpetuation, directly affects me as<br />
a creator. However, the book “Sprayed since 1929 – 2015” states that the first artist to<br />
use spray paint was Paul Klee, in his “Seltsames Theather” (1929). Thus, little by little<br />
new possibilities for the use of spray paint started to appear in traditional painting, by<br />
the likes of Jean-Michel Basquiat, Andy Warhol, Sigmar Polke, Julian Schnabel, Keith<br />
Haring, Sterling Ruby and others. In modern Instagram culture, artists who use this<br />
technique are sometimes called “post-vandals”, the creative direction itself is called<br />
“post-vandalism”. The informal, unconfirmed terminology / concept that describes such<br />
(anti)painting intrigues me and resonates directly with my chosen creative direction and<br />
motives, which I analyse in my chosen form of expression.<br />
The motives I choose can sometimes be seen as cliché, but in popular culture they still<br />
find their place as icons, symbols, signs and references to a particular event or place. It<br />
is no coincidence that I sometimes rely on religious motifs, representing faith not only in<br />
images but also in art itself. I usually use a central composition and large formats, thus<br />
giving the painting an impression of monumentality and grandeur; in my depersonalized<br />
“touch” I give the ease with which I seek to create an ambiguous effect, the tension<br />
between the motive and its performance, in which destructive moods are apparent.<br />
Therefore, at this stage of my work, I will continue to strive to balance between metaphor<br />
and specific reference, painting and graffiti. Dissolving layers of spray paint create<br />
the impression of reality/uncertainty and painting/anti- painting.
78<br />
Laura Aizporiete / LV<br />
Look Down.<br />
145x160cm, oil on canvas, 2020<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Creation of this work took place in rather unusual emotional and physical conditions. It<br />
was created in May, when most of the world’s society experienced an unprecedented<br />
time - a pandemic. People faced varios limitations of physical and emotional space.<br />
As a result, playing on the characteristic of this unusual time - “Lock Down” mode, this<br />
painting called “Look Down” was created. In its aesthetics and plot, it reflects alienation<br />
both physical and emotional.
80<br />
Līga Kalniņa / LV<br />
VIBES.<br />
145x185cm, mix media on canvas - collage of my sketches,<br />
acrylic, watercolor, oil paint, varnish, and hot glue, 2020<br />
www.facebook.com/liga.kalninaart.5<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
Conception-story about my artwork: This artwork is about water that unites as all. No<br />
matter with what background of social status, political interests, or religious beliefs.<br />
Message of water landscape and human figures and portraits in it includes distanced<br />
identity metaphysics. it is about our soul and life mission: To leave good works after our<br />
time to make universal time more valuable. My artistic ideas interact with my experience<br />
and time. I am interested in depth and clarity of expression. I like to explore<br />
monumental shape, space, scale, and speed. My goal in art is to create my own story<br />
of this time, capturing timeless emotions and passions.
82<br />
Martina Kryževičiūtė / LT<br />
The bright future of ,,Spring Grove’’ Hospital.<br />
100x165cm, canvas & mixed media, 2020<br />
X I I Y P P F I N A L I S T<br />
,,The bright future of Spring Grove hospital’’ is a first part from the set that consists<br />
of seven paintings. It visualises the scene from M. Pollan’s book “How to Change the<br />
Mind”.<br />
The work series depicts a scene from a real-life project at Spring Grove psychiatric<br />
hospital which includes a psychedelic research program my subjects are going through.<br />
The study participants are the patients suffering from mental disorders or addictions.<br />
The overall picture is seen from the position of another person involved in the research.<br />
Therefore reality is distorted, it emerges through altered and unrealistic perspective,<br />
size relations, atmosphere or symbols. All of this destroys the reality of the historical fact<br />
itself.
84<br />
<strong>XII</strong> YPP<br />
SPECIAL<br />
PRIZE<br />
Samanta Augutė / LT<br />
Storm.<br />
21x30cm, watercolor on paper, 2020<br />
www.instagram.com/saaugute<br />
X I I Y P P S P E C I A L P R I Z E<br />
The main artwork represents a moment of a stormy, chaotic and wild weather by which<br />
all of the characters are affected.The main character ( yellow coated man ) is caught<br />
by this storm, yet, he is running forward in a calm manner. There are little human-like<br />
figures around him (he is probably running towards them). His hands are disproportionately<br />
large, marked by red and blue fingers. These traits make him look almost like<br />
a wizard. Large hands and a figure leaning forward symbolizes a person who wants to<br />
help those little people in trouble depicted in the painting. I created this painting to metaphorically<br />
perpetuate an important personal experience. Yet it definitely speaks to all<br />
of the people who were “struck by a storm” the past year by all the events they had no<br />
control over. It also resembles the brave doctors who are saving people by risking their<br />
own well - being.
86<br />
<strong>XII</strong> YPP<br />
SPECIAL<br />
PRIZE<br />
Sonata Riepšaitė / LT<br />
Dormant Fountain.<br />
110x125cm, charcoal & varnish on canvas, 2019<br />
www.sonatariepsaite.com<br />
X I I Y P P S P E C I A L P R I Z E<br />
A landscape holds a special feeling in itself. It holds memories of different spaces and<br />
time that feels almost motionless. In the present moment imagination merge with present<br />
and connect these feelings into a landscape. A landscape becomes not just physical<br />
but embodies my memories, experience and identity.<br />
I compose imaginary landscapes of the real ones that I experienced, read, heard about<br />
or accidentally saw a picture of. These random bits and pieces that I collect of these<br />
landscapes correspond my memories of real landscapes and visions of non existent<br />
ones and help me express my subjective worldview. All the pieces are picked intuitively,<br />
but composed consciously. The experience of a landscape unfolds in many different<br />
forms and layers. I experience, see and read about it, hear the landscape itself and<br />
about it. All the different ways of approaching the landscape allows me to get more<br />
information about it and use all of it for inspiration.<br />
This is my attempt to think the landscape.
LT<br />
LV<br />
EE<br />
2<br />
0<br />
2<br />
0<br />
H I G H L Y L I S T E D<br />
P A R T I C I P A N T S :
ANASTASIJA BIKOVA<br />
ANNA KÕUHKNA<br />
ARNOLDS ANDERSONS<br />
ARTA RAITUMA<br />
AURELIJA BULAUKAITĖ<br />
BENEDIKTAS ŽUKAS<br />
DANEL KAHAR & GRISLI SOPPE-KAHAR<br />
DARIYA SUBBOTKINA<br />
DOVILĖ BAGDONAITĖ<br />
GABRIELĖ ALEKSĖ<br />
GODA LUKAITĖ<br />
INESE MANGUSE<br />
JEGORS BUIMISTERS<br />
KATRINA KOLK<br />
KELLI GEDVIL<br />
LAURA SLAVINSKAITĖ<br />
LINAS KAZIULIONIS<br />
LINDA LAGZDINA<br />
MARIJA RINKEVIČIŪTĖ<br />
MONIKA KUČIAUSKAITĖ<br />
MONIKA RADŽIŪNAITĖ<br />
OLESJA SEMENKOVA<br />
PAULA ZVANE<br />
POVILAS ČEPKAUSKAS<br />
RAIDO RANDOJA<br />
RŪTA MATULEVIČIŪTĖ<br />
SANDRA KVILYTĖ<br />
SAULĖ ŠALTYTĖ<br />
TADAS TRUCILAUSKAS<br />
ŽIVILĖ MINKUTĖ
Anastasija Bikova / LV<br />
Spirit locked up in the black space.<br />
300x300cm, sepia, acrylic, oil on canvas, 2020
Anna Kõuhkna / EE<br />
The new circle. 150x200cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Arta Raituma / LV<br />
Manifesto. The gate is open. 40x40cm, acrylic & graphite on burnt plywood, 2020
Arnolds Andersons / LV<br />
Hearts & minds. 150x125cm, acrylic on canvas, 2020
Aurelija Bulaukaitė / LT<br />
The portal. 50x70cm, oil on canvas, spray paint, 2020
Benediktas Žukas / LT<br />
Les fleurs du mal. 135x135cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Danel Kahar & Grisli Soppe-Kahar / EE<br />
Making different rules. Dark room. Up at night. 170x322x5cm, acrylic & coffee on cardboard, 2020
Dariya Subbotkina / EE<br />
Burden. 22x30cm, oil on paper, 2020<br />
Linda Lagzdina / LV<br />
Layer 20-6. 70x70cm, makeup on primed pvh panel
Dovilė Bagdonaitė / LT<br />
Passtoorrrrrralllllllllll. Kiiiiite runnnnnning. 222x322cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Gabrielė Aleksė / LT<br />
The Eye. 100x80cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Katrina Kolk / EE<br />
Loneliness is true self-love. 65x90cm, acrylic painting on canvas, 2020
Inese Manguse / LV<br />
Family egg tempera on gesso. 40x53cm, 2020
Jegors Buimisters / LV<br />
Perturbatio Aeterna (Vasily Rozanov). 120x95cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Goda Lukaitė / LT<br />
A Circle. 100x110cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Kelli Gedvil / EE<br />
Pores - Blur - Brighten. 70x50cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Povilas Čepkauskas / LT<br />
Brush with violence. 100x130cm, acrylic on canvas, 2020
Laura Slavinskaitė / LT<br />
Notes. 20x20cm, oil on canvas, 2019-2020
Marija Rinkevičiūtė / LT<br />
A hand cloth. 30x50cm, painting, photography on batiste hanged on a metal wire. 2019<br />
Linas Kaziulionis / LT<br />
Housework. 90x70cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Monika Kučiauskaitė / LT<br />
Hidden transparency. 76x61cm, acrylic on canvas, 2020
Monika Radžiūnaitė / LT<br />
Polis duobus continentur, sine altero non. 120x100cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Olesja Semenkova / EE<br />
Madonna. 45x55cm, mixed media, 2020
Paula Zvane / LV<br />
Fragile & protected. 10x10x4cm, oil & watercolor on canvas, soap, 2020
Raido Randoja / EE<br />
Umesh & Avi. 80x60cm, oil on panel, 2019
Sandra Kvilytė / LT<br />
Nothing left to see. 140x200cm, mixed technique, 2020<br />
Rūta Matulevičiūtė / LT<br />
Nijolė Šiaučiūnienė with her granddaughter Adelė. 180x100cm, oil on canvas, 2020
Saulė Šaltytė / LT<br />
Blooming. 150x160cm, fabric ink.
Tadas Trucilauskas / LT<br />
Gates of Empirea. 5,85x165x185cm
Živilė Minkutė / LT<br />
Mortal. 240x150cm, mixed technique, 2019
All Participants of <strong>Young</strong> <strong>Painter</strong> <strong>Prize</strong> 2020:<br />
www.ypp.lt/2020