CM December 2020
The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals
The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EXCLUSIVE REPORT<br />
STACKING<br />
THE ODDS<br />
Lenders are open to the risk of<br />
fraudulent use of multiple Personal<br />
Guarantees.<br />
AUTHOR – Sean Feast FCI<strong>CM</strong><br />
PERSONAL Guarantees (PGs)<br />
are being used fraudulently by<br />
small business owners to take<br />
out multiple loans without any<br />
chance of those loans ever being<br />
paid back.<br />
And Credit Reference Agencies (CRAs) who<br />
have been made aware of the practice and<br />
could solve the problem simply by creating a<br />
new PG database are so far failing to act.<br />
The news follows a review of loans agreed<br />
by several different lenders which have<br />
since defaulted and are now owned by the<br />
commercial debt solutions business, Azzurro<br />
Associates.<br />
Analysts within Azzurro quickly identified<br />
that the same PGs were being used to secure<br />
new loans from different lenders sometimes<br />
only days after a previous loan had defaulted<br />
and without the new lender being aware.<br />
Andrew Birkwood, Chief Executive of<br />
Azzurro Associates, has evidence of one case<br />
where the owner of a gift shop defaulted on a<br />
loan on 9 November with one lender, only to<br />
take out another loan with a different lender<br />
on 22 November using the exact same Personal<br />
Guarantee. He went bust owing more than<br />
£50,000: “Had the second lender been aware<br />
that the busines owner had been using the<br />
same PG, they would not have agreed to the<br />
loan,” he says.<br />
“The problem is that lenders would have no<br />
way of knowing, and the CRAs, who could do<br />
something about it, seem reluctant to listen.”<br />
THE CREDIT ECOSYSTEM<br />
CRAs are fundamental to the credit ecosystem.<br />
Their databases (CAIS – Experian, SHARE<br />
– TransUnion, Insight – Equifax), and the<br />
framework around accessing and submitting<br />
data to them, enable a fair lending construct<br />
allowing lenders to confidently offer financial<br />
products, and borrowers to safely secure credit.<br />
Previously, CRAs held consumer databases<br />
that included commercial transactions for sole<br />
traders, SMEs and small partnerships. In 1999,<br />
the Information Commissioners Office (ICO)<br />
instructed the CRAs to separate the ‘personal’<br />
and ‘business’ data for consumers which has<br />
since led to the maintenance of two discrete<br />
databases: Consumer and Commercial.<br />
In the instance of PG-backed lending for<br />
commercial loans, there is no CRA database for<br />
reporting the commitment by the individual<br />
PG, or the post-default liability. The credit<br />
contract is a commercial agreement, and thus<br />
it cannot be held within the Consumer CRA<br />
database. And currently, no personal data may<br />
be held within the Commercial CRA database.<br />
“This leads to several negative consequences<br />
for both the lender and the wider credit<br />
market, which are a material risk to sustainable<br />
commercial lending,” Andrew adds.<br />
For SMEs, particularly recently incorporated<br />
companies, finance is not always easily<br />
available with sole liability on the company.<br />
Commercial lenders commonly require a PG –<br />
usually a company director – to offer increased<br />
security against the repayment of the loan. The<br />
PG will undergo a credit score assessment, as<br />
part of the underwriting of the loan.<br />
“With no Personal Guarantor bureau, the<br />
facility for lenders to report the position of<br />
personal guarantees does not exist,” Andrew<br />
continues.<br />
“With PGs, the guarantee is not called upon<br />
by the creditor until the company defaults on<br />
payment. So there isn’t a default as such by the<br />
PG. The company defaults, and at that point the<br />
creditor can call on the PG for payment when<br />
the company has failed to pay. In this case<br />
liability for the debt shifts to the PG.”<br />
In the current hiatus created by the ICO there<br />
is no record of an individual guaranteeing a<br />
company debt; there is no record of whether that<br />
individual is currently liable for the guaranteed<br />
debt due to a default by the borrowing entity;<br />
and there is no record of a PGs payment<br />
behaviour in relation to a defaulted debt.<br />
PG ‘STACKING’<br />
This absence of data presents a challenge to<br />
commercial lenders looking to offer credit<br />
backed by a PG. A lender will underwrite the<br />
loan based on factors including the completion<br />
of an application form and a credit check<br />
on any guarantor(s). The lender at this point<br />
is only privy to the personal credit file of the<br />
Advancing the credit profession / www.cicm.com / <strong>December</strong> <strong>2020</strong> / PAGE 21<br />
continues on page 22 >