26.11.2020 Views

CM December 2020

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXCLUSIVE REPORT<br />

Sean Feast FCI<strong>CM</strong><br />

PG, which could be extremely strong. The<br />

lender has no visibility of any commercial<br />

credit guarantees that have been made, and<br />

whether the PG has repaid any defaulted<br />

lines.<br />

“If such data were available, the credit<br />

decision may end up being very different,”<br />

Andrew adds. “We have seen multiple<br />

instances of individuals with clean credit<br />

files guaranteeing multiple commercial<br />

credit lines – a practice known as ‘Stacking’.<br />

“In such instances, PGs can guarantee<br />

many lines of credit with multiple credit<br />

providers, with each lender oblivious to<br />

the underlying credit risk. In the event of<br />

default, the PG will see no detriment to their<br />

personal credit file, unless the lender obtains<br />

a Judgment against the individual. In this<br />

latter case, if another lender is chasing a PG<br />

for a guaranteed debt, there is almost no way<br />

a new lender would know this – unless the<br />

defaulted debt lender has secured a county<br />

court judgement against the PG.<br />

“In the event a PG guarantees multiple<br />

credit lines, the risk that the PG will remain<br />

solvent if some of the debts guaranteed fall<br />

into default, is less than certain. Creditors<br />

should be furnished with such information<br />

at the underwriting stage of a new loan.”<br />

ESTABLISHED LENDERS<br />

Andrew says that many established<br />

commercial lenders including Liberis and<br />

Newable Business Loans acknowledge the<br />

problem of PG stacking and the hidden<br />

credit risk that is created.<br />

Varun Goel, Director at Liberis, says the<br />

problem could be easily be resolved if the<br />

CRAs are willing: “Even with all of the due<br />

diligence and risk analysis we do before<br />

agreeing to the provision of finance, we<br />

cannot currently see if a Personal Guarantee<br />

has been used on multiple loan applications,<br />

as we only have visibility of the personal<br />

and commercial credit files. As such, PG<br />

‘Stacking’ remains a risk that is completely<br />

hidden from view.”<br />

Phil Reynolds, Managing Director of<br />

Newable Lending, says PG ‘Stacking’ is<br />

certainly an issue and cites other challenges:<br />

“At the origination stage, it is difficult<br />

to get visibility of a borrower’s full PG<br />

obligations, due both to multiple companyloan<br />

combinations and outstanding balances<br />

versus the total guaranteed (i.e default fees,<br />

early settlement etc).<br />

“Although we do a considerable amount of<br />

director matching at Companies House, this<br />

still relies on the director’s Companies House<br />

profile being correct and often it is not. We<br />

have seen numerous occasions where the<br />

same individual is a director of multiple<br />

companies, but their director profile is<br />

not linked, usually because of something<br />

as simple as a discrepancy in their date of<br />

birth.”<br />

HARD OF HEARING<br />

Andrew is frustrated that approaches to<br />

CRAs have so far produced no substantive<br />

response: “A possible solution is to create<br />

a third CRA database, solely dedicated to<br />

personal guarantees. This database can be<br />

governed by the same ruleset within the<br />

Principles of Reciprocity, only allowing the<br />

reporting of PGs (both live and defaulted),<br />

with access only permitted to those who<br />

contribute to the database. This provides<br />

transparency, fairness and consistency to<br />

commercial lending, whilst minimising the<br />

potential credit risk currently at play.”<br />

“With PGs, the guarantee is<br />

not called upon by the creditor<br />

until the company defaults on<br />

payment. So there isn’t a default<br />

as such by the PG. The company<br />

defaults, and at that point the<br />

creditor can call on the PG for<br />

payment when the company has<br />

failed to pay. In this case liability<br />

for the debt shifts to the PG.”<br />

– Andrew Birkwood, Azzurro Associates.<br />

“Many Banks and Alternative Finance<br />

Providers routinely request PGs,” Andrew<br />

explains. “The call for a bureau to maintain a<br />

PG register would give the lenders access to<br />

the PGs true financial position at the point<br />

of advance, currently signing a PG doesn’t<br />

automatically impact personal credit but it<br />

is a hidden risk to lenders. The awareness<br />

of this hidden risk shouldn’t only become<br />

apparent when a debt defaults and the PG is<br />

called upon to make payments or is sued in<br />

the County Courts.”<br />

Andrew is calling on the CRAs to take<br />

decisive action: “We believe, and are<br />

supported by many lenders in this view,<br />

that new commercial lending depends on<br />

understanding the full credit risk picture.<br />

“By enabling the reporting of PGs, CRAs<br />

will stimulate commercial lending at a<br />

time critical to the health and resurgence<br />

of the UK economy. With Government led<br />

COVID-19 funding sources soon to expire,<br />

now is the time to resolve this issue to allow<br />

the lending community to proactively lend<br />

to businesses with clarity and confidence in<br />

their lending decisions.”<br />

Advancing the credit profession / www.cicm.com / <strong>December</strong> <strong>2020</strong> / PAGE 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!