CM December 2020
The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals
The CICM magazine for consumer and commercial credit professionals
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EXCLUSIVE REPORT<br />
Sean Feast FCI<strong>CM</strong><br />
PG, which could be extremely strong. The<br />
lender has no visibility of any commercial<br />
credit guarantees that have been made, and<br />
whether the PG has repaid any defaulted<br />
lines.<br />
“If such data were available, the credit<br />
decision may end up being very different,”<br />
Andrew adds. “We have seen multiple<br />
instances of individuals with clean credit<br />
files guaranteeing multiple commercial<br />
credit lines – a practice known as ‘Stacking’.<br />
“In such instances, PGs can guarantee<br />
many lines of credit with multiple credit<br />
providers, with each lender oblivious to<br />
the underlying credit risk. In the event of<br />
default, the PG will see no detriment to their<br />
personal credit file, unless the lender obtains<br />
a Judgment against the individual. In this<br />
latter case, if another lender is chasing a PG<br />
for a guaranteed debt, there is almost no way<br />
a new lender would know this – unless the<br />
defaulted debt lender has secured a county<br />
court judgement against the PG.<br />
“In the event a PG guarantees multiple<br />
credit lines, the risk that the PG will remain<br />
solvent if some of the debts guaranteed fall<br />
into default, is less than certain. Creditors<br />
should be furnished with such information<br />
at the underwriting stage of a new loan.”<br />
ESTABLISHED LENDERS<br />
Andrew says that many established<br />
commercial lenders including Liberis and<br />
Newable Business Loans acknowledge the<br />
problem of PG stacking and the hidden<br />
credit risk that is created.<br />
Varun Goel, Director at Liberis, says the<br />
problem could be easily be resolved if the<br />
CRAs are willing: “Even with all of the due<br />
diligence and risk analysis we do before<br />
agreeing to the provision of finance, we<br />
cannot currently see if a Personal Guarantee<br />
has been used on multiple loan applications,<br />
as we only have visibility of the personal<br />
and commercial credit files. As such, PG<br />
‘Stacking’ remains a risk that is completely<br />
hidden from view.”<br />
Phil Reynolds, Managing Director of<br />
Newable Lending, says PG ‘Stacking’ is<br />
certainly an issue and cites other challenges:<br />
“At the origination stage, it is difficult<br />
to get visibility of a borrower’s full PG<br />
obligations, due both to multiple companyloan<br />
combinations and outstanding balances<br />
versus the total guaranteed (i.e default fees,<br />
early settlement etc).<br />
“Although we do a considerable amount of<br />
director matching at Companies House, this<br />
still relies on the director’s Companies House<br />
profile being correct and often it is not. We<br />
have seen numerous occasions where the<br />
same individual is a director of multiple<br />
companies, but their director profile is<br />
not linked, usually because of something<br />
as simple as a discrepancy in their date of<br />
birth.”<br />
HARD OF HEARING<br />
Andrew is frustrated that approaches to<br />
CRAs have so far produced no substantive<br />
response: “A possible solution is to create<br />
a third CRA database, solely dedicated to<br />
personal guarantees. This database can be<br />
governed by the same ruleset within the<br />
Principles of Reciprocity, only allowing the<br />
reporting of PGs (both live and defaulted),<br />
with access only permitted to those who<br />
contribute to the database. This provides<br />
transparency, fairness and consistency to<br />
commercial lending, whilst minimising the<br />
potential credit risk currently at play.”<br />
“With PGs, the guarantee is<br />
not called upon by the creditor<br />
until the company defaults on<br />
payment. So there isn’t a default<br />
as such by the PG. The company<br />
defaults, and at that point the<br />
creditor can call on the PG for<br />
payment when the company has<br />
failed to pay. In this case liability<br />
for the debt shifts to the PG.”<br />
– Andrew Birkwood, Azzurro Associates.<br />
“Many Banks and Alternative Finance<br />
Providers routinely request PGs,” Andrew<br />
explains. “The call for a bureau to maintain a<br />
PG register would give the lenders access to<br />
the PGs true financial position at the point<br />
of advance, currently signing a PG doesn’t<br />
automatically impact personal credit but it<br />
is a hidden risk to lenders. The awareness<br />
of this hidden risk shouldn’t only become<br />
apparent when a debt defaults and the PG is<br />
called upon to make payments or is sued in<br />
the County Courts.”<br />
Andrew is calling on the CRAs to take<br />
decisive action: “We believe, and are<br />
supported by many lenders in this view,<br />
that new commercial lending depends on<br />
understanding the full credit risk picture.<br />
“By enabling the reporting of PGs, CRAs<br />
will stimulate commercial lending at a<br />
time critical to the health and resurgence<br />
of the UK economy. With Government led<br />
COVID-19 funding sources soon to expire,<br />
now is the time to resolve this issue to allow<br />
the lending community to proactively lend<br />
to businesses with clarity and confidence in<br />
their lending decisions.”<br />
Advancing the credit profession / www.cicm.com / <strong>December</strong> <strong>2020</strong> / PAGE 23