Arizona Kracken lawsuit

Case 2:20-cv-02321-DJH Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 30 of 53
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
84. The Affiant explains the use of an algorithm and how it presents throughout
the statement, but specifically concludes that,
The “Digital Fix” observed with an increased spike in VOTES for Joe
Biden can be determined as evidence of a pivot. Normally it would be
assumed that the algorithm had a Complete Pivot. Wilkinson’s
demonstrated the guarantee as:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Such a conjecture allows the growth factor the ability to be upper bound by
values closer to n. Therefore, complete pivoting can’t be observed because
there would be too many floating points. Nor can partial as the partial
pivoting would overwhelm after the “injection” of votes. Therefore,
external factors were used which is evident from the “DIGITAL FIX.”
(See Id. at pars. 67-69)
“The algorithm looks to have been set to give Joe Biden a 52% win even
with an initial 50K+ vote block allocation was provided initially as tallying
began (as in case of Arizona too). In the am of November 4, 2020 the
algorithm stopped working, therefore another “block allocation” to remedy
the failure of the algorithm. This was done manually as ALL the
SYSTEMS shut down NATIONWIDE to avoid detection.”
(See Id. at par. 73)
85. And Russ Ramsland can support that further by documenting the data feed
that came from Dominion Voting Systems to Scytl based on certain available data, that it
was reported with decimal points, which is contrary to one vote as one ballot: “The fact
that we observed raw vote data coming directly that includes decimal places
establishes selection by an algorithm, and not individual voter’s choice. Otherwise,
votes would be solely represented as whole numbers (votes cannot possibly be added
up and have decimal places reported).”
- 30 -