05.12.2020 Views

Arizona Kraken lawsuit

Kraken lawsuit against gov and sec state filed on December 2, 2020--Highlights o Mismatched signature o No access for poll watchers o No chain of custody o Lowering of signature verification standards (15 points of similarity to none) o Exact same signatures on different mail-in envelopes o Duplicated ballots that were switched from Trump to Biden (duplicated ballots are damaged ballots that are manually copied onto clean ballots) o Trump overvotes were rejected (e.g., Trump voter fills in Trump bubble and handwrites "Donald Trump for President") o Destroyed Trump ballots (returned ballots being counted as unreturned ballots) o Unreturned ballots voted by someone other than the person to whom they were sent o Out of state votes (illegal) o Software settings can make votes “disappear” o Host of other Dominion issues that require expert testimony and analysis

Kraken lawsuit against gov and sec state filed on December 2, 2020--Highlights
o Mismatched signature
o No access for poll watchers
o No chain of custody
o Lowering of signature verification standards (15 points of similarity to none)
o Exact same signatures on different mail-in envelopes
o Duplicated ballots that were switched from Trump to Biden (duplicated ballots are damaged ballots that are manually copied onto clean ballots)
o Trump overvotes were rejected (e.g., Trump voter fills in Trump bubble and handwrites "Donald Trump for President")
o Destroyed Trump ballots (returned ballots being counted as unreturned ballots)
o Unreturned ballots voted by someone other than the person to whom they were sent
o Out of state votes (illegal)
o Software settings can make votes “disappear”
o Host of other Dominion issues that require expert testimony and analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Case 2:20-cv-02321-DJH Document 1 Filed 12/02/20 Page 34 of 53<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

12<br />

13<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16<br />

17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

21<br />

22<br />

23<br />

24<br />

25<br />

26<br />

27<br />

28<br />

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are voted for, all records and<br />

papers which come into his possession relating to any<br />

application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act<br />

requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by<br />

law, such records and papers may be delivered to another officer of<br />

election and except that, if a State or the Commonwealth of Puerto<br />

Rico designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and<br />

papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be<br />

deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve<br />

any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian.<br />

Any officer of election or custodian who willfully fails to comply<br />

with this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned<br />

not more than one year, or both.<br />

See 52 USC § 20701.<br />

3.Dominion Vulnerabilities to Hacking.<br />

91. Plaintiffs have since learned that the “glitches” in the Dominion<br />

system -- that have the uniform effect of hurting Trump and helping Biden -- have<br />

been widely reported in the press and confirmed by the analysis of independent<br />

experts, a partial summary of which is included below.<br />

(1) Users on the ground have full admin privileges to machines and<br />

software. The Dominion system is designed to facilitate vulnerability<br />

and allow a select few to determine which votes will be counted in any<br />

election. Workers were responsible for moving ballot data from polling<br />

place to the collector’s office and inputting it into the correct folder.<br />

Any anomaly, such as pen drips or bleeds, is not counted and is handed<br />

over to a poll worker to analyze and decide if it should count. This<br />

creates massive opportunity for improper vote adjudication. (Ex. 14<br />

Watkins aff. 8 & 11).<br />

(2) Affiant witness (name redacted for security reasons), in his sworn<br />

testimony explains he was selected for the national security guard<br />

detail of the President of Venezuela, and that he witnessed the<br />

creation of Smartmatic for the purpose of election vote<br />

manipulation:<br />

I was witness to the creation and operation of a sophisticated electronic<br />

- 34 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!