03.02.2021 Views

Montour Run Watershed Assessment & Implementation Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• The Shannon Diversity Index is very similar, however,

Shannon accounts for both abundance and evenness

within a sample set, rather than relative abundance and

evenness. This means that if only one or two organisms

of a particular genus are present, it will impact the

Simpson’s DI value less than the Shannon DI.

Overview: The Montour Run Watershed has been

impacted by Abandoned Mine Drainage (AMD), urban

runoff, and siltation from erosion for many years. While

the quality of the watershed and macroinvertebrate

populations within it appear to be decreasing between

the November 2017 and May 2018 collections (Table

2.2.3), this is most likely due to historic rainfall totals

in the region having caused underground mine pools

with polluted water to overflow into Montour Run. The

headwaters of Montour Run in Subwatershed Areas

2-North Fork and West Enlow and 3-South Fork and Lower

Enlow are impacted by detrimental influences, but have

maintained relatively strong diversity and population

counts. Subwatershed Areas 1-Airport Drainage and

4-Robinson/Beaver Grade are heavily impacted by

runoff from Pittsburgh International Airport, heavy

commercialization downstream of the airport, and

compacted residential areas present throughout. These

tributaries show low population counts, limited diversity,

and the presence of only a few pollution sensitive

organisms.

MR01 –

Mouth

MR02 –

Meeks

MR03 – DS

McClaren

MR04 –

McClaren

MR05 –

Enlow

MR06 – DS

Enlow

MR07 –

South Fork

MR08 –

North Fork

Total

Organisms

Number of

Genera

Shannon

Diversity

Index

Subwatershed Area 5-Meeks, Trout and Salamanders

Head Tributaries run through healthy, relatively

forested areas with low anthropogenic impacts. This

subwatershed area shows high quality water, greater

macroinvertebrate population counts, and greater

diversity with higher populations of pollution sensitive

organisms. Contributions in flow from these tributaries

dilute contaminants in Montour Run further downstream

in Subwatershed Areas 5 and 6, diminishing their impact

on water quality and the macroinvertebrate populations.

This results in Subwatershed Area 6-Lower Montour

Run being relatively healthy compared to the upstream

Subwatershed Areas. Further study will be required to

assess long-term effects of the increased AMD discharges

from the winter of 2018 within this watershed.

Area 1: Airport Drainage - McClaren and East Enlow Fork

McClaren Run are impacted by Pittsburgh International

Airport drainage and ever increasing concentrations of

commercial development along its bank. The drop in the

Shannon Diversity Index score was the largest of all eight

sample sites. These changes likely indicate an increase

in AMD flow within this tributary during heavy storm

flows. Further water and macroinvertebrate testing will be

needed for comparison to confirm this.

The headwaters of the eastern portion of Enlow Fork

Simpson

Diversity

Index

Hilsenhoff Biotic

Index (HBI)

%EPT

-86.59% -54.17% -24.39% -9.22% -3.14% -81.80%

-80.00% -46.43% -17.28% -6.40% -1.90% -9.09%

-65.72% -47.83% -24.52% -53.77% 17.32% -88.51%

-79.78% -47.37% -31.91% -20.82% 5.93% -70.06%

215.66% 57.14% -22.35% -29.34% -20.49% -75.85%

-63.35% -36.36% -28.11% -21.55% 23.37% -88.29%

-10.00% 37.50% -1.74% -2.64% 9.91% -83.06%

43.48% 50.00% 6.14% 0.37% 52.42% -34.19%

begin directly north of Pittsburgh International Airport

and are then tunneled beneath the airport until just

north of Enlow Road. Sediment and urban runoff from

the airport, the I-376 Business Loop, and upstream

development heavily impact this stream, particularly

during precipitation events. This portion of Enlow Fork

was not sampled for macroinvertebrate populations.

Area 2: North Fork Montour and West Enlow- The main

factors impacting the North Fork are urban runoff/sewer

overflow, siltation due to habitat modification, and AMD,

according to the PA DEP. Visual observations in the North

Fork include cloudy water, heavy erosion along the banks,

and high concentrations of development throughout.

These headwater impairments are easily seen in the data

collected for Area 2. North Fork had very low species

abundance counts for November 2017, which increased

in May 2018, as did diversity and species richness metrics.

These increased metrics are due to the extremely low

species abundance counts. West Enlow Fork is impacted

by drainage from Interstates 376 and 576. This upper

region was not sampled for macroinvertebrates.

Area 3-South Fork Montour Run and Lower Enlow-The

South Fork of Montour Run is heavily impacted by

“erosion from derelict land” causing sedimentation on

the outskirts of the landfill at the headwaters. In addition,

AMD throughout and urban runoff/sewer overflow in the

downstream portion have also contributed to erosion.

South Fork increased in Genera Richness between

2017 and 2018, however all other metrics decreased

from 2017 to 2018. Genera Richness was higher in May

than in November, but species abundance decreased

compared to the other Subwatershed Areas. South

Fork changed the least from November 2017 to May

2018. This indicates that there was little change in water

quality at this site, most likely because no additional

AMD overflows occurred upstream of this site between

November 2017 and May 2018. Decreases in diversity

and species abundance could also be attributed to

seasonal differences in populations resulting from

macroinvertebrate lifecycles.

Enlow Fork is impacted by Pittsburgh International

Airport drainage, residential developments, commercial

zoning, and Interstates 376 and 576 with some forested

land bordering West Enlow Fork. These impairments are

shown in November 2017 with extremely low metrics

in both species abundance and diversity. In 2018,

species abundance and average pollutant tolerance

did increase slightly. All other metrics decreased even

further. Compared to other sampling sites, this site

decreased less in quality. Coupled with the increase in

species abundance and decrease in pollution tolerance,

the decrease in diversity could mean water quality has

not been impacted significantly within the sampling

timeframe.

Table 2.2.3-Percent change in macroinvertebrate popluation metrics between November 2017 and May 2018. Green

highlights represent metrics that increased between 2017 and 2018.

Dragonfly nymph found in Montour Run during November 2018 sampling

24 | Assessing and Quantifying Watershed Health Montour Run Watershed Assessment & Implementation Plan | 25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!