19.04.2021 Views

QualPharma December 2020

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PATENT AND TRADEMARK

Recent Trends in Pre-grant opposition

The Indian Patenting system allows any

person (third party) to file a pre-grant

opposition and that too free of cost. The

idea behind this provision is to aid the

examination procedure of an invention,

and to encumber granting of wrongful or

frivolous inventions, as was held by the

Hon’ble Delhi High Court in UCB Farchim

vs. Cipla Ltd. & Ors.

“….This Court finds merit in the contention

that the pre-grant opposition is in

fact “in aid of the examination” of

the patent application by the Controller….”

However, quite frequently nowadays, it is

observed, that the third party tries to misuse

their rights in delaying the grant of

several important patents using illegitimate

strategies. In several patent applications

made at Indian Patent Office, a multiple

number of pre-grant oppositions are

filed by the Opponents one after another

without providing useful insights into the

matter by citing any new references or

necessary evidence over the already considered

responses to examination report

or already file representation of oppositions.

This line of attack is merely to delay

the grant of a patent.

Apparently, such strategies do not comply

with the judicial intent of assisting the

examination of the application and is an

exploitation of the legal system of patenting

procedures.

Conclusion

The Opposition system prevalent in our

country may be “a boon or a bane” in the

patenting procedure of a new invention.

To make it a “boon”, some changes in our

legal system are definitely required. The

Controller needs to efficiently identify the

merits in the opposition being filed before

notifying the Applicant about the same. If

the subsequent representation of oppositions

by other opponents carries no further

merits than what has already been

held in the examination reports or former

oppositions, the representation should be

dismissed in-limine. Further, some penalty

must be imposed on such fraudulent

opponents to ensure a legitimate proceeding

of any application as governed by the

Patents Act, with the opposition truly

serving as an ‘aid’ in the examination

procedure towards the grant/refusal of a

patent.

~By Tanu Singh

Leading Patent Provider of Pharmaceutical products

Only one call away

The world leading pharmaceutical

patents provider

www.drsanjayagrawal.com/

9825381729

25 Years of experience in Drugs

innovation and pharmaceutical

product creation

QualPharma *Dec 2020* , Vol.3 ISSUE 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!