September 2021 Persecution Magazine
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Christians Barred from Joining<br />
Political Party in South Australia<br />
In the Australian state of South Australia<br />
(SA), more than 500 Christians were<br />
barred from joining the state’s Liberal Party,<br />
a major center-right political party in the<br />
country.<br />
According to party president Legh<br />
Davis, “An independent investigation<br />
is underway, and the party will not be<br />
accepting membership applications until the<br />
investigation is complete.”<br />
The would-be party members mostly<br />
came from SA’s Pentecostal communities.<br />
Recently, a Christian member of Australia’s<br />
Parliament named Alex Antic was leading an<br />
effort called “Believe in Blue” to encourage<br />
Christians to participate in the political<br />
process. This effort by Antic coincided with<br />
a larger movement of Christians in South<br />
Australia to challenge the status quo in their<br />
state’s politics in light of rapidly changing<br />
social policies.<br />
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of<br />
Christian Adoption Agency<br />
On June 17, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Christian<br />
adoption agency that had its contract with the City of<br />
Philadelphia revoked over its refusal to place children<br />
with same-sex parents. In a 9-0 decision, all of the<br />
justices agreed that Catholic Social Services<br />
should have its contract reinstated and be<br />
allowed to place children with only heterosexual<br />
couples.<br />
Despite the victory, many religious freedom advocates<br />
saw this case, Fulton v. Philadelphia, as an ideal opportunity<br />
for the Court to correct a serious and potentially dangerous<br />
error in American constitutional law, one that makes<br />
religious freedom a second-class right. Those advocates<br />
were, as expressed by Justice Alito in a concurring opinion,<br />
disappointed. “The Court has emitted a wisp of a decision<br />
that leaves religious liberty in a confused and vulnerable<br />
state,” wrote Alito. “Those who count on this court to<br />
stand up for the First Amendment have every right to be<br />
disappointed — as am I.”<br />
PERSECU ION.ORG<br />
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN 9