31.08.2021 Views

September 2021 Persecution Magazine

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Christians Barred from Joining<br />

Political Party in South Australia<br />

In the Australian state of South Australia<br />

(SA), more than 500 Christians were<br />

barred from joining the state’s Liberal Party,<br />

a major center-right political party in the<br />

country.<br />

According to party president Legh<br />

Davis, “An independent investigation<br />

is underway, and the party will not be<br />

accepting membership applications until the<br />

investigation is complete.”<br />

The would-be party members mostly<br />

came from SA’s Pentecostal communities.<br />

Recently, a Christian member of Australia’s<br />

Parliament named Alex Antic was leading an<br />

effort called “Believe in Blue” to encourage<br />

Christians to participate in the political<br />

process. This effort by Antic coincided with<br />

a larger movement of Christians in South<br />

Australia to challenge the status quo in their<br />

state’s politics in light of rapidly changing<br />

social policies.<br />

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of<br />

Christian Adoption Agency<br />

On June 17, the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Christian<br />

adoption agency that had its contract with the City of<br />

Philadelphia revoked over its refusal to place children<br />

with same-sex parents. In a 9-0 decision, all of the<br />

justices agreed that Catholic Social Services<br />

should have its contract reinstated and be<br />

allowed to place children with only heterosexual<br />

couples.<br />

Despite the victory, many religious freedom advocates<br />

saw this case, Fulton v. Philadelphia, as an ideal opportunity<br />

for the Court to correct a serious and potentially dangerous<br />

error in American constitutional law, one that makes<br />

religious freedom a second-class right. Those advocates<br />

were, as expressed by Justice Alito in a concurring opinion,<br />

disappointed. “The Court has emitted a wisp of a decision<br />

that leaves religious liberty in a confused and vulnerable<br />

state,” wrote Alito. “Those who count on this court to<br />

stand up for the First Amendment have every right to be<br />

disappointed — as am I.”<br />

PERSECU ION.ORG<br />

INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CONCERN 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!